<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Ben, thanks for the prompt response. <BR>
Right now i have Xorp running in a pretty nice lab enviroment with OSPF and BGP with PIM multicast. <BR>
However two Service providers that i work with, have told me they are planning to switch in the short term to IS-IS in V4 to support a single protocol operation in V4/V6. That is why i was asking about ISIS, i understand that OSPFv2 and V3 can do the same but at least what i have seen is that seems to be a shift to ISIS in some service providers.<BR>
<BR>
BTW, I have used XORP in my lab for years and consider it the most stable and performant routing suite for linux <BR>
<BR>
Thanks!<BR>
<BR>
Patricio<BR> <BR>> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 20:31:29 -0700<BR>> From: greearb@candelatech.com<BR>> To: p_latini@hotmail.com<BR>> CC: xorp-users@xorp.org<BR>> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] (no subject)<BR>> <BR>> On 07/08/2010 05:53 PM, Patricio Latini wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> > Hello, just wanted to check if there are any plan in the development<BR>> > team to add IS-IS support for IPv4/v6 in any upcoming release.<BR>> <BR>> Not by me, but maybe someone else is considering it.<BR>> <BR>> A quick read of wikipedia makes it seem like OSPF would be a good<BR>> alternative...is there some reason you want IS-IS instead of OSPF?<BR>> <BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Ben<BR>> <BR>> -- <BR>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com><BR>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com<BR> <br /><hr />Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. <a href='http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1' target='_new'>Learn more.</a></body>
</html>