<font size="4"><font face="times new roman,serif">DNP3 protocol do include some support for what it calls Pseudo Transport Layer. And it also mentions that some company would like to see DNP3 can be put on TCP/IP. So I would like to try use flowunit to implement DNP3 protocol. <br>
</font></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Adam J. Slagell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:slagell@ncsa.illinois.edu">slagell@ncsa.illinois.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Seth Hall wrote:<br>
<br>
> I don't think you can use datagram if the protocol you're working on is TCP since the packets could be fragmented or out of order. I'd love to be proven wrong though....<br>
<br>
</div>Obviously, modbus-tcp was on tcp, but is DNP3?<br>
<br>
------<br>
Adam J. Slagell, CISSP<br>
Sr. Security Engineer<br>
National Center for Supercomputing Applications<br>
<div class="im">University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br>
</div><a href="http://www.slagell.info" target="_blank">www.slagell.info</a><br>
<a href="tel:217.244.8965" value="+12172448965">217.244.8965</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Hui Lin<br>Research Assistant<br>DEPEND Research Group, ECE Department<br>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br><a href="mailto:hlin33@illinois.edu" target="_blank">hlin33@illinois.edu</a><br>