net specification in bro
vern at ee.lbl.gov
Mon Nov 20 01:37:43 PST 2000
> We are planning to fix it, because we are quite interested in Bro and we
> are going to use it a lot. I'll post any result to this list, so if you are
> interested you can consider including it into future versions.
Great, I'm very interested in picking up fixes such as these.
> > I hadn't considered this - do you need something different from what you
> > could achieve if Bro supported /n prefixes?
> Yes, I mean something more general: a way to specify IP ranges that cannot
> be specified through net masks such as /n, e.g. 192.168.34.12-23
That sounds good.
More information about the Bro