net specification in bro

Vern Paxson vern at
Mon Nov 20 01:37:43 PST 2000

> We are planning to fix it, because we are quite interested in Bro and we
> are going to use it a lot. I'll post any result to this list, so if you are 
> interested you can consider including it into future versions.

Great, I'm very interested in picking up fixes such as these.

> > I hadn't considered this - do you need something different from what you 
> > could achieve if Bro supported /n prefixes?
> Yes, I mean something more general: a way to specify IP ranges that cannot
> be specified through net masks such as /n, e.g.

That sounds good.


More information about the Bro mailing list