sanreich at gmx.de
Sat Oct 7 10:21:00 PDT 2006
>> but - it only works with traffic on the listening interface - is that
>> right? i dont have a network trap or something like this, my
>> configuration for testing is:
>> 2 PCs with 1 eth interface connected to a switch.
>> when i start both bros, there is nothing written into the remote-logs
>> until i start a port-scan to generate traffic. what would be the best
>> way to generate dummy traffic ?
> Mhmmm this is not supposed to happen any more -- older versions did
> indeed have the problem that communication was "driven" by observing
> live traffic, but as of 1.1 this should be fixed. Things depend on
> whether your OS supports selectable file descriptors or not. Could you
> please tell us what OS you are on, and post (or send me) the config.h
> file you obtain after running configure? Thanks.
Im using Suse 10.0 on both machines. One Bro1.1 runs on PC 'A', the
other on PC 'B' runs on VMware Server, because I started testing with
our wireless 0.9a9 edition and we havnt finished the wireless patch for
1.1 yet. It should be done within the next days.
A: Suse 10.0 & Bro 1.1
B: Suse 10.0 & "Bro-wireless" 0.9a9
VMware: Suse 10.0 Bro 1.1
The config.h are equal on both machines.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the Bro