[Bro] Newb with a couple questions
rjenkins at rmjconsulting.net
Thu Mar 14 03:54:59 PDT 2013
No such thing as too much logging.
Ron Jenkins (SnortCP,VCP 3 / 4,MCNE,MCPS,MCNPS,CCNA)
RMJ Consulting, LLC.
"Bringing Companies and Solutions Together"
Owner / Senior Architect
11715 Bricksome Ave STE B-7
Baton Rouge, LA 70816
7575 Jefferson Hwy #103
Baton Rouge, LA 70806
Email. rjenkins at rmjconsulting.net
On Mar 14, 2013, at 5:50 AM, "MICHAEL WAITE" <mfw113 at psu.edu> wrote:
> I would not call the conn log redundant. The http and conn log are very different and have different data in them. Rather they complement each other.
> On Mar 13, 2013, at 18:31, James Lay <jlay at slave-tothe-box.net> wrote:
>> On 2013-03-13 16:14, anthony kasza wrote:
>>> Depending on what you are trying to accomplish, you can filter the
>>> data by protocol after it's been written to the conn.log file with
>>> bro-cut or awk.
>> Hi Anthony,
>> Ideally the protocols would be dropped before logging. I already have
>> dns and http logging using Bro, so seeing them in the connections log
>> seems a tad redundant. Thanks for the quick response.
>> Bro mailing list
>> bro at bro-ids.org
> Bro mailing list
> bro at bro-ids.org
More information about the Bro