[ee122] MNL doesn't transmit Ack

[Haley Nguyen]

I use MNL_sendto() to send the ack, but I noticed TestRecv use sendto() to
send the reply. Is there is reason that TestRecv use sendto() and not
MNL_sendto()?

On Dec 8, 2007 8:36 PM, Haley Nguyen <haley.ng at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a receiver and a sender running. The sender send a packet to the
> receiver, and the receiver sends an Ack back.
>
> My program runs ok with UDP sendto(), but after I change it to use
> MNL_sendto(), only the receiver receive the packet from sender, but the
> sender doesn't get the ack. In the MNLDaemon, it shows that the ack was
> transmitted just like the data, but the receiver hung waiting for the ack. I
> don't know what I do wrong.
>
> --
> Haley Nguyen




-- 
Haley Nguyen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/ee122/attachments/20071208/d42fe4d3/attachment.html