[ee122] lying to mnl
fowler at eecs.berkeley.edu
Sun Dec 9 14:11:09 PST 2007
Those fields are optional and for your logging purposes only.
On Dec 9, 2007 1:56 PM, Ofer Sadgat <ofer at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> The way that I have written my program, by the time that I would call
> sendto, the windowsize and header length and all of that information is
> unavailable. I did use a sliding window protocall, but would I lose points
> if I plain out lied to mnl and put 0? Another problem could be that my
> sequence numbers are not byte addressed, it is packet addressed. And packets
> are variable in length so I would have to rewrite a lot of code to do it
> that way. Or, could I just use my sequence numbers instead?
> ee122 mailing list
> ee122 at mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
More information about the ee122