[ee122] FSM

vern at cs.berkeley.edu vern at cs.berkeley.edu
Sun Nov 11 19:12:20 PST 2007

> ... I am not sure how, in our own implementation of a reliable transport
> protocol (the actual code), we would send a packet after our program
> crashes.

You don't need to worry about this case, because for this project you
indeed won't have any easy way to send such an emergency-teardown message.

> So I was wondering if it's a requirement to handle abrupt
> terminations.  I'm guessing that you're implying it is?

Per the above, no, not a requirement.


More information about the ee122 mailing list