[ee122] Project Spec Clarification

[Lisa Fowler]

Part A is necessary for full credit of Part B.  It will be safe to
assume that you can submit one client/server pair once you have
created a fully working Part B.

If you are having trouble with EITHER part and are worried about
getting full credit, it would behoove you to submit a .zip of the
first part, or the second part sans networking, in addition to your
attempt at the other part.  Does that make sense?  This would help
Daniel in giving you partial credit where applicable.

-Lisa

On 9/15/07, Josh Hunt <joshua.hunt at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> No, I think they're asking if we should have:
>
> http_client-a
> http_client-b
> http_server-a
> http_server-b
>
> Josh
>
>
> On 9/14/07, Daniel Killebrew <dank at eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Yes, different executables. If you read the spec more closely you will
> find:
> >
> > 2. The client should compile to a binary called http client.
> > 3. The server should compile to a binary called http server.
> >
> > =)
> > Daniel
> >
> > o x wrote:
> > > Part A and Part B of project 1 specify different client, server
> > > behaviors.  Should we submit different executables that implement both
> > > the echo client/server and the pseudo-HTTP client/server specifications?
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ee122 mailing list
> > > ee122 at mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
> > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/ee122
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ee122 mailing list
> > ee122 at mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/ee122
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ee122 mailing list
> ee122 at mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/ee122
>
>