[ee122] More questions abt part B
fowler at eecs.berkeley.edu
Sat Sep 22 21:36:49 PDT 2007
Sure that's a valid "host number", but it's not going to get you
anywhere! Just like 0.0.0.0 isn't going to get you anywhere... :)
Let it be a network failure.
On 9/22/07, Anthony Kilman <a_kilman at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> For the client portion.. when the doc specifies "HOSTNUMBER" does this
> mean we need to support for literal IP's? The grammar says no (as far as
> I can tell) because a '+' means one or more. So, technically
> 1234567188.8.131.52 could be a valid "HOSTNUMBER"
> Is this correct, or am I way off?
> ee122 mailing list
> ee122 at mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
More information about the ee122