[ee122] More questions abt part B

[Lisa Fowler]

Sure that's a valid "host number", but it's not going to get you
anywhere!  Just like 0.0.0.0 isn't going to get you anywhere...  :)
Let it be a network failure.

-Lisa

On 9/22/07, Anthony Kilman <a_kilman at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> For the client portion.. when the doc specifies "HOSTNUMBER" does this
> mean we need to support for literal IP's? The grammar says no (as far as
> I can tell) because a '+' means one or more. So, technically
> 123456789.12.12.12 could be a valid "HOSTNUMBER"
>
> Is this correct, or am I way off?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ee122 mailing list
> ee122 at mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/ee122
>