From eric.boettner at gmail.com Tue Jan 29 19:25:36 2013 From: eric.boettner at gmail.com (Eric Boettner) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Netalyzr] Help! Test result Code 34 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Good evening, I ran the test today - and got this error. I've run the test many of times, but today is the first time it flew up this specific error message. Can someone tell me what it means? Thanks! NAT support for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) (?): Not tested? An I/O error occurred during the test. The test result code is 34. -- Eric M. Boettner mobile: 864.304.5542 | e-mail: eric.boettner at gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/ericboettner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/netalyzr/attachments/20130129/00d4449f/attachment.html From nweaver at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Wed Jan 30 05:59:46 2013 From: nweaver at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Nicholas Weaver) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:59:46 -0800 Subject: [Netalyzr] Help! Test result Code 34 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Eric Boettner wrote: > > Good evening, > > I ran the test today - and got this error. I've run the test many of times, but today is the first time it flew up this specific error message. Can someone tell me what it means? Thanks! > > NAT support for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) (?): Not tested? > An I/O error occurred during the test. The test result code is 34. > It means we weren't able to contact your NAT using Universal Plug and Play, and that our code crashed during this process. So I wouldn't worry about it from your network's viewpoint, but if you have the test results URL, that wolud be useful to us to help debug why this occuredd. Thansk. From sovrevage at gmail.com Wed Jan 30 10:24:45 2013 From: sovrevage at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stian_=D8vrev=E5ge?=) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:24:45 +0100 Subject: [Netalyzr] Help! Test result Code 34 In-Reply-To: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> References: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Eric Boettner wrote: > >> >> Good evening, >> >> I ran the test today - and got this error. I've run the test many of times, but today is the first time it flew up this specific error message. Can someone tell me what it means? Thanks! >> >> NAT support for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) (?): Not tested? >> An I/O error occurred during the test. The test result code is 34. >> > > It means we weren't able to contact your NAT using Universal Plug and Play, and that our code crashed during this process. So I wouldn't worry about it from your network's viewpoint, but if you have the test results URL, that wolud be useful to us to help debug why this occuredd. > > Thansk. > > Maybe your ISP have taken some measures to limit UPnP in light of Rapid7 and HD Moores publication of a research paper yesterday showing tens of millions of exposed devices with unprotected UPnP instances ( http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/01/29/disable-a-protocol-called-upnp-on-your-router-now-to-avoid-a-serious-set-of-security-bugs/ ). But, of course. It's most likely something else :-) Brgds, Stian ?vrev?ge From nweaver at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Wed Jan 30 10:47:50 2013 From: nweaver at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Nicholas Weaver) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:47:50 -0800 Subject: [Netalyzr] Help! Test result Code 34 In-Reply-To: References: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <53F49039-C567-4443-B279-63B528B98D60@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> On Jan 30, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Stian ?vrev?ge wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Nicholas Weaver > wrote: >> >> On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Eric Boettner wrote: >> >>> >>> Good evening, >>> >>> I ran the test today - and got this error. I've run the test many of times, but today is the first time it flew up this specific error message. Can someone tell me what it means? Thanks! >>> >>> NAT support for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) (?): Not tested? >>> An I/O error occurred during the test. The test result code is 34. >>> >> >> It means we weren't able to contact your NAT using Universal Plug and Play, and that our code crashed during this process. So I wouldn't worry about it from your network's viewpoint, but if you have the test results URL, that wolud be useful to us to help debug why this occuredd. >> >> Thansk. >> >> > > Maybe your ISP have taken some measures to limit UPnP in light of > Rapid7 and HD Moores publication of a research paper yesterday showing > tens of millions of exposed devices with unprotected UPnP instances ( > http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/01/29/disable-a-protocol-called-upnp-on-your-router-now-to-avoid-a-serious-set-of-security-bugs/ > ). > > But, of course. It's most likely something else :-) Nope. That is a probe from Java running on your computer to your local network, so the ISP doesn't matter. But we are (in the next couple of days) going to add code to check for these UPnP vulnerabilities: The actual vulnerability space is higher, HD. Moore only found EXTERNAL facing UPnP, internal is also a problem and can also be vulnerable. From maciej at soltysiak.com Thu Jan 31 00:56:35 2013 From: maciej at soltysiak.com (Maciej Soltysiak) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:56:35 +0100 Subject: [Netalyzr] Help! Test result Code 34 In-Reply-To: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> References: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: Hi, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Eric Boettner wrote: > > > > > Good evening, > > > > I ran the test today - and got this error. I've run the test many of > times, but today is the first time it flew up this specific error message. > Can someone tell me what it means? Thanks! > > > > NAT support for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) (?): Not tested? > > An I/O error occurred during the test. The test result code is 34. > > > > It means we weren't able to contact your NAT using Universal Plug and > Play, and that our code crashed during this process. So I wouldn't worry > about it from your network's viewpoint, but if you have the test results > URL, that wolud be useful to us to help debug why this occuredd. Perhaps it's a good point to attach the above description to the error message so that it is more meaningful for the user. Best regards, Maciej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/netalyzr/attachments/20130131/7eb4fc0d/attachment.html From nweaver at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Thu Jan 31 05:41:44 2013 From: nweaver at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Nicholas Weaver) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:41:44 -0800 Subject: [Netalyzr] Help! Test result Code 34 In-Reply-To: References: <4C6FD116-F75A-466C-8426-18BE4AC9F8A9@icsi.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <9384A899-E4BA-45B0-867E-9EBD317A3D47@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> On Jan 31, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Nicholas Weaver wrote: > > On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Eric Boettner wrote: > > > > > Good evening, > > > > I ran the test today - and got this error. I've run the test many of times, but today is the first time it flew up this specific error message. Can someone tell me what it means? Thanks! > > > > NAT support for Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) (?): Not tested? > > An I/O error occurred during the test. The test result code is 34. > > > > It means we weren't able to contact your NAT using Universal Plug and Play, and that our code crashed during this process. So I wouldn't worry about it from your network's viewpoint, but if you have the test results URL, that wolud be useful to us to help debug why this occuredd. > > Perhaps it's a good point to attach the above description to the error message so that it is more meaningful for the user. True, but this error is very rare: Do you have a session where I can try to figure out what caused the error? We have debugging output in the results link which would give us more information.