[Tmrg-interest] feedback on draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics?
Michael Welzl
michael.welzl at uibk.ac.at
Thu Mar 15 06:33:42 PDT 2007
Dear Sally, dear TMRG'ers,
I think that this email should refer to
draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-09.txt
( http://www.icir.org/tmrg/draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-09.txt )
and not -06
BTW, the reference to RFC 3168 seems to be broken ("BIBREF ..." )
Cheers,
Michael
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 11:38 -0700, Sally Floyd wrote:
> This is a last check of the research group to see that there is
> rough consensus that "Metrics for the Evaluation of Congestion
> Control Mechanisms", internet-draft draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics-06.txt,
> is ready for forward to the IRTF for review and publication as an
> Informational RFC.
>
> This draft finished review in TMRG several months ago, and it just
> finished a pass of feedback from ICCRG (the Internet Congestion
> Control Research Group). The feedback included feedback from
> Michael Welzl and Lachlan Andrew adding explanations to the fairness
> discussions, and some general feedback from Mark Allman.
>
> I would like to forward this to the IRTF next week (March 19). This
> is a final check of the TMRG that there is rough consensus for this
> document to be forwarded. The abstract of the document contains
> the following caveat:
>
> This document is a product of the Transport Modeling Research Group
> (TRMG), and has received detailed feedback from many members of the
> Research Group (RG). As the document tries to make clear, there is
> not necessarily a consensus within the research community (or the
> IETF community, the vendor community, the operations community, or
> any other community) about the metrics that congestion control
> mechanisms should be designed to optimize, in terms of tradeoffs
> between throughput and delay, fairness between competing flows, and
> the like. However, we believe that there is a clear consensus that
> congestion control mechanisms should be evaluated in terms of
> tradeoffs between a range of metrics, rather than in terms of
> optimizing for a single metric.
>
> Thanks -
>
> - Sally
> http://www.icir.org/floyd/
>
>
> History within TMRG:
>
> * The first version of the draft was submitted in May 2005.
>
> * The draft has had contributions or reviews from the following:
> Armando Caro, Dah Ming Chiu, Dado Colussi, Wesley Eddy,
> Nelson Fonseca, Janardhan Iyengar, Doug Leith, Saverio Mascolo, Sean
> Moore, Injong Rhee, David Ros, Andras Veres, and Damon Wischik,
>
> * The procedure for advancing to Informational was outlined in
> email on November 8 to the TMRG mailing list, and the
> draft received a review from David Ros.
>
> * Finished a round of feedback from ICCRG on March 6, 2007.
> Feedback from Mark Allman, Lachlan Andrew, and Michael Welzl.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tmrg-interest mailing list
> Tmrg-interest at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/tmrg-interest
More information about the Tmrg-interest
mailing list