[Tmrg] Round-table PFLDnet submission

[Lachlan Andrew]

Greetings Cesar,

On 26/11/2007, Cesar Marcondes <cmarcond06 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2007 4:46 PM, Lachlan Andrew <lachlan.andrew at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On possibility would then be to choose one or two "typical" set of
> > parameters, and have a set of tests which varies only one of the
> > parameters from that "typical" list.  Do the sums to see how many
> > tests you end up with to work out how many "typcial" sets will be
> > needed.  What do people on the list think of that approach?
>
> I think the general scenario could explore a good sub-space of
> parameters that fit in a 3-day simulation. I believe that's the right
> thing to do.

Yes, we should explore a good sub-set.

When I said "a set of tests which varies only one of the parameters",
I should have said that each test varies a *different* parameter (they
don't all just vary the same parameter!).  If we have three or four
base "typical" scenarios and in each scenario we explore the impact of
each parameter (or most parameters), I think that will allow a
reasonably varied subset of scenarios to be explored.  Do you agree?

Cheers,
Lachlan

-- 
Lachlan Andrew  Dept of Computer Science, Caltech
1200 E California Blvd, Mail Code 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
Ph: +1 (626) 395-8820    Fax: +1 (626) 568-3603
http://netlab.caltech.edu/~lachlan