[Tmrg] Towards a Common TCP Evaluation Suite - traffic generator question

Lachlan Andrew lachlan.andrew at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 07:45:26 PDT 2008


Greetings,

I've contacted the Tmix team asking for their measured traces, and
hope to generate suitable short traces from them.  If they don't reply
soon, I'll try to generate some synthetic traffic (probably Poisson
arrivals and Pareto file sizes).

However, if we need to resort to that, I'd suggest that we go back to
using  Harpoon  which actually exists for Linux.  The minor increase
in realism it allows will be lost if we have to use synthetic data
anyway.

The Full-TCP issue also applies to the main set of "general tests".
One one hand, I think that the authors of a modification to TCP should
be willing to write it for the Full-TCP module.  On the other hand,
this is another reason to go back to  Harpoon,  especially if people
want to compare their enhancements to the existing enhancements.

Cheers,
Lachlan

On 24/03/2008, Wang gang <wanggang at research.nec.com.cn> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>  I have a question about using Tmix in the traffic generation in
>  ns2 simulaion.
>
>  If we use Tmix as the traffic generator in the three node pairs
>  of the Dumb-Bell topology,  we need to have the connection
>  vectors for the described  load and packet size distributions
>  listed in the paper, is that right? Or who will provide them?
>
>  And since Tmix is using Full-TCP, if we want to do
>  IV E. Impact on standard TCP traffic and
>  F. Intra-protocol fairness in the paper, we need the TCP variants
>  implemented using Full-TCP (They are not now). Is this
>  a problem? Correct me if I'm wrong.



-- 
Lachlan Andrew  Dept of Computer Science, Caltech
1200 E California Blvd, Mail Code 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
Ph: +1 (626) 395-8820    Fax: +1 (626) 568-3603
http://netlab.caltech.edu/lachlan


More information about the Tmrg-interest mailing list