No subject



Sat Apr 30 19:38:33 2005
Return-Path: xorp-cvs-admin@icir.org
Delivery-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:39:01 -0700
Received: from wyvern.icir.org (wyvern.icir.org [192.150.187.14])
	by tigger.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3UJd1xZ057358
	for <atanu@tigger.icir.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from xorp-cvs-admin@icir.org)
Received: from fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.11])
	by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3UJd1VV024063
	for <atanu@icir.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from xorp-cvs-admin@icir.org)
Received: from fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3UJd0Gq006863;
	Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org (wyvern.icir.org [192.150.187.14])
	by fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3UJcXGq006854
	for <xorp-cvs@icsi.berkeley.edu>; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68])
	by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3UJcXVV024059
	for <xorp-cvs@icir.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from pavlin@icir.org)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3UJcXrS057139
	for <xorp-cvs@icir.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from pavlin@xorpc.icir.org)
Received: (from pavlin@localhost)
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id j3UJcXmj057138
	for xorp-cvs@icir.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:38:33 GMT
	(envelope-from pavlin)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:38:33 GMT
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin@icir.org>
Message-Id: <200504301938.j3UJcXmj057138@xorpc.icir.org>
To: xorp-cvs@icir.org
X-XORP-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Subject: [Xorp-cvs] XORP cvs commit: xorp/pim
Sender: xorp-cvs-admin@icir.org
Errors-To: xorp-cvs-admin@icir.org
X-BeenThere: xorp-cvs@icir.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:xorp-cvs-request@icir.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:xorp-cvs@icir.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-cvs>,
	<mailto:xorp-cvs-request@icir.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Mailing list for XORP CVS commit messages <xorp-cvs.icir.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-cvs>,
	<mailto:xorp-cvs-request@icir.org?subject=unsubscribe>

CVSROOT:	/usr/local/share/doc/apache/cvs
Module name:	xorp
Changes by:	pavlin@xorpc.icir.org	2005-04-30 19:38:33 UTC

XORP CVS repository


Modified files:
	pim           TODO 

Log message:
	* Remove TODO entries that are already done:
	  - SPEC+IMPL: if we ignore (*,G) Join/Prune entry because of RP
	    mismatch, then the (S,G) and (S,G,rpt) entries within same group
	    shouldn't be ignored.
	
	* Remove TODO entries that don't need to be done:
	  - "IMPL: whenever the iif changes, should we remove all matching
	    PimMfc, and reset the SPTbit?"
	    No, the appropriate PIM-SM state machines will take care
	    of whatever needs to be done.
	  - "IMPL: If (S,G,rpt) Prune (only) is received, but there is no
	    (*,G) routing state, then (S,G,rpt) routing state is created
	    (in RPTNotJoined state). Shall we avoid the temporary creation
	    of such state?"
	    No, this state is harmless and will timeout.
	
	* Reclassify the following TODO entry:
	  - "IMPL+SPEC+TESTSUTE: if the MRIB.next_hop(RP) changes, should
	     we send first the (*,*,RP) Join first, or the (*,*,RP) Prune first?"
	     The spec and the implementation are fixed: the Join message
	     is sent first. Now only the testsuite needs to be fixed to reflect
	     that.

Revision  Changes                               Path
1.104     +4 -19;  commitid: dee44273dcda7ea6;  xorp/pim/TODO
_______________________________________________
Xorp-cvs mailing list
Xorp-cvs@icir.org
http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-cvs