On 11/8/05, Mike Horn <caddisconsulting@yahoo.com> wrote: > I too would prefer using a numbering convention for sub-interfaces (e.g. > fxp1.1, fxp1.2, etc.) if this is feasible. I don't really think it is, for the reasons I've listed in previous mail. I agree it would be nicer from a user point of view, but it would be a developer nightmare. - Mark