WG: [Xorp-hackers] Bugzilla #161
Pavlin Radoslavov
pavlin@icir.org
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:46:53 -0700
[Note: a reply to an 1.5 month old email]
> And at last I think it is not optimal to determine the protocol from witch a
>
> Route was learn by the admin distance, there should be a sepperate field,
> because in production environment sometimes you have the need to change the
> ad for a protocol when you transit from a protocol to another. And If xorp
> Should support more then one vrf, or mpls, more then one ospf daemon there
> Should be a way to decide from witch we have learned the route.
The issue is now fixed in CVS, so the "show_routes" operational
command receives from RIB the protocol-origin for each route rather
than using a hackish mechanism to guess it.
Also, note that now the "show routes" output format has changed a
bit to accomodate the extra information (the admin distance).
Thanks for pointing the problem,
Pavlin