[Xorp-hackers] Rewrite of rtrmgr and xorpsh

Kristian Larsson kristian at spritelink.se
Tue Nov 14 15:04:56 PST 2006


I browsed the Bugzilla just now and saw #677
I'm a bit curious to where the limitations of the
current rtrmgr and xorpsh lies?

What great new features might one expect from this?
 :)

This is rather nitpicky but there's one feature
I'd like to see, not sure if it's in anyway
related to #677 though, and that is to simply have
a parameter set to true or false based on whether
it's present or lacking in the configuration.

like:
interface fxp0 {
	vif fxp0 {
		disable;
	}
}

instead of disable = true/false.

Last but not least, is this something high
priority or something rather far down on the
priority list?

Cheers,
   Kristian.

-- 
Kristian Larsson                                   KLL-RIPE
Network Engineer                      Net at Once [AS35706]
+46 704 910401			     kristian at spritelink.se



More information about the Xorp-hackers mailing list