[Xorp-hackers] Rewrite of rtrmgr and xorpsh
Kristian Larsson
kristian at spritelink.se
Tue Nov 14 15:04:56 PST 2006
I browsed the Bugzilla just now and saw #677
I'm a bit curious to where the limitations of the
current rtrmgr and xorpsh lies?
What great new features might one expect from this?
:)
This is rather nitpicky but there's one feature
I'd like to see, not sure if it's in anyway
related to #677 though, and that is to simply have
a parameter set to true or false based on whether
it's present or lacking in the configuration.
like:
interface fxp0 {
vif fxp0 {
disable;
}
}
instead of disable = true/false.
Last but not least, is this something high
priority or something rather far down on the
priority list?
Cheers,
Kristian.
--
Kristian Larsson KLL-RIPE
Network Engineer Net at Once [AS35706]
+46 704 910401 kristian at spritelink.se
More information about the Xorp-hackers
mailing list