[Xorp-hackers] [Xorp-cvs] XORP cvs commit: xorp/etc/templates
kristian at spritelink.se
Mon Feb 26 02:55:53 PST 2007
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 10:31:13AM +0000, Atanu Ghosh wrote:
> CVSROOT: /usr/local/www/data/cvs
> Module name: xorp
> Changes by: atanu at xorpc.icir.org 2007-02-26 10:31:13 UTC
> XORP CVS repository
> Modified files:
> etc/templates rib.cmds
> Log message:
> Add OSPFv3 route commands; copy OSPFv2 text and substitute OSPFv2 ->
> OSPFv3, ipv4 -> ipv6.
I know this has more to it than just this CVS
commit, but it triggered a few thoughts.
Is it really wise to differentiate OSPFv2 and
OSPFv3 with the ospf keywords?
>From what I've heard there has been talk about
supporting several simultaneous address families
within OSPFv3 just as with IS-IS. Now how would
you configure that if it's called ospf4 and ospf6
With ospf it feels like we're abstracting
something that shouldn't have an abstraction layer
over it in the first place. ospf or just ospf
and ospf3 as juniper calls it is fine imho.
Kristian Larsson KLL-RIPE
Network Engineer SpriteLink [AS39525]
+46 704 910401 kristian at spritelink.se
More information about the Xorp-hackers