[Xorp-hackers] Route with bad next-hop added with OSPF with redundant-link configuration.

[Ben Greear]

Atanu Ghosh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you think that routes are being incorrectly computed could you send
> me the LSA database as well as the routes that you expect to see.
>
> The LSA database can be extracted with the print_lsas command.
> $ print_lsas -S saved.lsas
>
>   Atanu.
>   
lsas are attached (for router 2).  I see these routes:

[root at lf1016-55 lanforge]# ip route show table 10002
99.1.1.0/24 dev 2.3.2  scope link
10.2.2.0/24 dev eth2  scope link
10.1.1.0/24 via 10.1.2.2 dev 1.2.2  proto xorp  metric 2 notify
10.1.2.0/24 dev 1.2.2  scope link
unreachable default  proto xorp  metric 1 notify

I expect to see:
[root at lf1016-55 lanforge]# ip route show table 10002
99.1.1.0/24 dev 2.3.2  scope link
10.2.2.0/24 dev eth2  scope link
10.1.1.0/24 via 10.1.2.1 dev 1.2.2  proto xorp  metric 2 notify
                                ^^^^
10.1.2.0/24 dev 1.2.2  scope link
unreachable default  proto xorp  metric 1 notify


Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: saved.lsas
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 265 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-hackers/attachments/20071024/9febc1cc/attachment.obj