[Xorp-hackers] Route with bad next-hop added with OSPF with redundant-link configuration.

[Ben Greear]

Ben Greear wrote:
> Atanu Ghosh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you think that routes are being incorrectly computed could you send
>> me the LSA database as well as the routes that you expect to see.
>>
>> The LSA database can be extracted with the print_lsas command.
>> $ print_lsas -S saved.lsas
>>
>>   Atanu.
>>   
> lsas are attached (for router 2).  I see these routes:
> 
> [root at lf1016-55 lanforge]# ip route show table 10002
> 99.1.1.0/24 dev 2.3.2  scope link
> 10.2.2.0/24 dev eth2  scope link
> 10.1.1.0/24 via 10.1.2.2 dev 1.2.2  proto xorp  metric 2 notify
> 10.1.2.0/24 dev 1.2.2  scope link
> unreachable default  proto xorp  metric 1 notify
> 
> I expect to see:
> [root at lf1016-55 lanforge]# ip route show table 10002
> 99.1.1.0/24 dev 2.3.2  scope link
> 10.2.2.0/24 dev eth2  scope link
> 10.1.1.0/24 via 10.1.2.1 dev 1.2.2  proto xorp  metric 2 notify
>                                ^^^^
Sorry, that ^^^ was supposed to be below the 10.1.2.1

Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com