[Xorp-hackers] static xrl interface calls

[Li Zhao]

Thanks for the reply. I have coded my prototype protocol process. Two things I am still working on. In order to start dependended modules, it takes a long time. Sencond, it static routes is having a depending nodule, I dont want cli to delete xorp_static_routes. C++ xrl interface functions are working fine. My process can use them directly talking to static routes to update the routes. 

--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Bruce Simpson <bms at incunabulum.net> wrote:

> From: Bruce Simpson <bms at incunabulum.net>
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] static xrl interface calls
> To: "Li Zhao" <lizhaous2000 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: xorp-hackers at icir.org
> Date: Monday, October 19, 2009, 11:06 AM
> Li Zhao wrote:
> > Actually this is a generic question. For any new
> config coming from xorpsh, how are these xrl client
> functions sent to the target process from rtrmgr?
> >   
> 
> The Router Manager uses the textual Finder protocol to make
> indirect XRL method calls, as it parses the configuration
> tree; it does not use the C++ bindings directly. Please see
> the '*.xrls' files generated as part of the XRL stubs.
> 
> thanks,
> BMS
> 
>