[Xorp-hackers] More ideas for xorp code size improvements.
greearb at candelatech.com
Thu Apr 15 11:55:44 PDT 2010
On 04/15/2010 11:45 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> On 04/15/10 19:26, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 04/15/2010 09:10 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
>>> On 04/15/10 07:48, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>> I'm not too sure. It might be that horribly complex template
>>>> thing that builds callbacks methods. If I were to tackle it, I'd
>>>> probably change some callback signatures to pass in const string&
>>>> and then see what broke and try to work backwards from there...
>>> Futzing with 'string' might be a noop, because many STL implementations
>>> ref-count the internal string representation (GNU libstdc++ does, for
>> Yeah, looks like it wouldn't save much..but would still save a little,
>> and should be cleaner code.
> I'm not sure what you mean by cleaner code here.
> It's difficult for me to assess this further without seeing sample code.
It's a personal preference..and it saves a small bit of stack
space and ref-count increment/decrement. But, probably it's
a small thing and not worth much worry, and certainly some time
it's not at all convenient or useful to pass by reference.
>> There might be other areas where we are passing stuff by value that
>> could be const foo& as well..but I haven't looked hard.
> Input arguments are generally passed by value (and constified) already.
> Output arguments are passing values back to the glue wrapper which
> invokes them. They are then responsible for output marshaling. As a
> side-effect, they can't be const and remain references; they'd have to
> become pointers.
Ok, I haven't yet looked closely enough to understand the limitations
> The usual practice for profiling code size changes, in static binary
> footprint, is to use 'nm' and 'size' a lot. You can profile RSS at load
> time using Exmap. If you're looking for a source to crib scripts from,
> please see my posts on the Apache JIRA thrift-users list from around 4
> months ago.
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
More information about the Xorp-hackers