[Xorp-hackers] XORP enhancement for wireless mesh network routing
Ben Greear
greearb at candelatech.com
Fri Jun 1 13:36:54 PDT 2012
On 06/01/2012 01:33 PM, Igor Maravić wrote:
>>
>> It will lead to an error just like original XORP, the error will be "no
>> direct connected interface ..." I guess.
>>
>
> Well the BGP doesn't agree. With your changes route resolution for BGP
> will be broken.
>
> I think that better solution would be to add function that forces
> adding of direct route. Something like add_connected_route.
>
> Then You should think a way to call that function from OLSR, and all
> other protocols that need such route resolution.
Igor: Why should we ever restrict adding the connected routes?
It seems to me that if the routing protocol wants it added, fea
should just do so. But maybe I'm missing something?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
More information about the Xorp-hackers
mailing list