[Xorp-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] xorp: fea: data_plane: ifconfig: Check if we can set destination address for vif(IPv6)
Ben Greear
greearb at candelatech.com
Fri Mar 23 09:19:04 PDT 2012
On 03/23/2012 09:03 AM, igorm at etf.rs wrote:
> From: Igor Maravic<igorm at etf.rs>
>
> If our vif on system isn't point-to-point link
> we can't set appropriate destination address. Commit will fail in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Maravic<igorm at etf.rs>
> ---
> xorp/fea/data_plane/ifconfig/ifconfig_set.cc | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xorp/fea/data_plane/ifconfig/ifconfig_set.cc b/xorp/fea/data_plane/ifconfig/ifconfig_set.cc
> index 046ab3e..75013da 100644
> --- a/xorp/fea/data_plane/ifconfig/ifconfig_set.cc
> +++ b/xorp/fea/data_plane/ifconfig/ifconfig_set.cc
> @@ -706,6 +706,15 @@ IfConfigSet::push_vif_address(const IfTreeInterface* system_ifp,
> is_add = false;
> }
>
> + if (system_vifp != NULL) {
> + if (system_vifp->point_to_point() != config_addr.point_to_point()) {
Should this check be something more like:
if (config_addr.point_to_point() && !system_vifp->point_to_point()) {
?
Looks like you changed this exact code in the next patch?
Thanks,
Ben
> + error_msg = c_format("Can't set destination address for if: %s vif: %s"
> + "because it isn't point-to-point interface\n",
> + system_ifp->ifname().c_str(), system_vifp->vifname().c_str());
> + goto done;
> + }
> + }
> +
> //
> // XXX: For whatever reason a prefix length of zero does not cut it, so
> // initialize prefix to 64. This is exactly what ifconfig(8) does.
--
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
More information about the Xorp-hackers
mailing list