From ratul@cs.washington.edu Mon Aug 1 03:12:39 2005 From: ratul@cs.washington.edu (Ratul Mahajan) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:12:39 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host Message-ID: <42ED8517.6090204@cs.washington.edu> > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing experiments, not a general solution. so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? (i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the code/docs but specific pointers would help.) thanks. Mark Handley wrote: >> The XORP Vision page mentions the ability to emulate multiple routers on the same host, saying this can be done if you modify the FEA. My question is how do you modify the FEA to do this? Do you have to hack code, or can this be done by configuration? > > > > Right now you'd have to hack code for it to be general. You could run > multiple dummy FEA processes (each with its own finder and routing > protocols) but there would be no way to exchange routing packets > between the different virtual routers. > As part of a project to implement IS-IS in XORP, I have a student who > is looking to test his implementation by emulating multiple routers, > so we've given some thought to how to make this work (but he was only > looking at IS-IS). But right now, there's no code committed into CVS > to do this. > > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing experiments, not a general solution. > > - Mark From James Courtier-Dutton Mon Aug 1 12:17:09 2005 From: James Courtier-Dutton (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:17:09 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host In-Reply-To: <42ED8517.6090204@cs.washington.edu> References: <42ED8517.6090204@cs.washington.edu> Message-ID: On 8/1/05, Ratul Mahajan wrote: > > > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same machine, as > > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer address and port on a > > per-peer basis. So if you want to experiment with BGP, this is > > possible without code changes. But the resulting virtual routers > > won't actually forward packets to each other, so this is only useful > > for routing experiments, not a general solution. > > so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? > > (i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the code/docs but > specific pointers would help.) > > thanks. > > Mark Handley wrote: > How about using XEN. You can then virtualise multiple Linux boxes efficiently, and run a single XORP on each one. From ratul@cs.washington.edu Mon Aug 1 03:05:47 2005 From: ratul@cs.washington.edu (Ratul Mahajan) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:05:47 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host In-Reply-To: <23332.1111571016@aardvark.cs.ucl.ac.uk> References: <23332.1111571016@aardvark.cs.ucl.ac.uk> Message-ID: <42ED837B.5020607@cs.washington.edu> > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing experiments, not a general solution. so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? thanks! ps: i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the code/docs but it would help to have specific pointers. Mark Handley wrote: >>The XORP Vision page mentions the ability to emulate multiple routers on >>the same host, saying this can be done if you modify the FEA. My >>question is how do you modify the FEA to do this? Do you have to hack >>code, or can this be done by configuration? > > > Right now you'd have to hack code for it to be general. You could run > multiple dummy FEA processes (each with its own finder and routing > protocols) but there would be no way to exchange routing packets > between the different virtual routers. > > As part of a project to implement IS-IS in XORP, I have a student who > is looking to test his implementation by emulating multiple routers, > so we've given some thought to how to make this work (but he was only > looking at IS-IS). But right now, there's no code committed into CVS > to do this. > > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing experiments, not a general solution. > > - Mark From ratul@cs.washington.edu Mon Aug 1 19:10:24 2005 From: ratul@cs.washington.edu (Ratul Mahajan) Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:10:24 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host In-Reply-To: References: <42ED8517.6090204@cs.washington.edu> Message-ID: <42EE6590.1040809@cs.washington.edu> James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > On 8/1/05, Ratul Mahajan wrote: > >> > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same machine, as >> > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer address and port on a >> > per-peer basis. So if you want to experiment with BGP, this is >> > possible without code changes. But the resulting virtual routers >> > won't actually forward packets to each other, so this is only useful >> > for routing experiments, not a general solution. >> >>so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? >> >>(i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the code/docs but >>specific pointers would help.) > > How about using XEN. You can then virtualise multiple Linux boxes > efficiently, and run a single XORP on each one. i guess that (and other interface-level virtualization mechanisms) is an option but i'd be more interested in retaining the configuration of the experimenting machine and play at a user-level if possible. thanks. From atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Wed Aug 3 21:41:23 2005 From: atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Atanu Ghosh) Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:41:23 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host In-Reply-To: Message from Ratul Mahajan of "Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:10:24 PDT." <42EE6590.1040809@cs.washington.edu> Message-ID: <16592.1123101683@tigger.icir.org> Hi, I have recently been experimenting with imunes . Imunes allows the creation of multiple network stacks on a single host. Currently Imunes only works on FreeBSD 4.11 and requires kernel modifications. I have built a FreeBSD 4.11 system inside vmware applied the kernel patches and built XORP. My very limited experiments have worked well. Multiple instances of XORP can be run on a single host each on its own network stack. Therefore no modifications to XORP. If you want to run multiple instance of XORP/BGP on one host the instructions are below. NOTE: BGP IS THE ONLY PROTOCOL THAT CAN BE RUN THIS WAY. Atanu. ======================================== 1) Modify the template files to run the dummy fea rather than the real fea. Otherwise multiple processes will attempt to modify the routing table. In xorp/etc/templates run the script below or modify the templates manually. ---------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh grep -l \"fea/xorp_fea\" * | while read name do echo $name ed $name <<\! 1,$s/"fea\/xorp_fea"/"fea\/xorp_fea_dummy"/ wq ! done ---------------------------------------- 2) Create the router configuration files. The BGP protocol requires that port 179 is used TCP sessions. As our regression tests run on a single host our BGP can be configured to use any port. Below is the configuration for two XORP instances on a single host: CONFIG1 ---------------------------------------- interfaces { interface dc0 { vif dc0 { disable: false address 10.10.10.1 { prefix-length: 24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } } } protocols { bgp { bgp-id: 10.10.10.1 local-as: 65001 peer 127.0.0.1 { local-ip: 127.0.0.1 as: 65002 next-hop: 10.10.10.1 local-port: 2001 peer-port: 2002 } /* Introduce a route */ network4 10.10.10.0/24 { next-hop: 10.10.10.1 unicast: true multicast: true } } } ---------------------------------------- CONFIG2 ---------------------------------------- interfaces { interface dc0 { vif dc0 { disable: false address 10.10.10.2 { prefix-length: 24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } } } protocols { bgp { bgp-id: 10.10.10.2 local-as: 65002 peer 127.0.0.1 { local-ip: 127.0.0.1 as: 65001 next-hop: 10.10.10.2 local-port: 2002 peer-port: 2001 } } } ---------------------------------------- 3) The different processes that make up a XORP router communicate with each other using a default port. This port number can be changed using the enviroment variable "XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT". Start two instances of XORP in separate shells: XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7001 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG1 XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 Either XORP router instance can now be communicated with by setting the appropriate enviroment varaiable. Note that router2 has the route introduced by router1. ---------------------------------------- emu$ XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorpsh Welcome to XORP on emu.icir.org Xorp> show bgp routes Status Codes: * valid route, > best route Origin Codes: i IGP, e EGP, ? incomplete Prefix Nexthop Peer AS Path ------ ------- ---- ------- *> 10.10.10.0/24 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.1 65001 ? Xorp> ---------------------------------------- ======================================== >>>>> "Ratul" == Ratul Mahajan writes: Ratul> James Courtier-Dutton wrote: >> On 8/1/05, Ratul Mahajan wrote: >> >>> > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same >>> machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer >>> address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to >>> experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. >>> But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward >>> packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing >>> experiments, not a general solution. >>> >>> so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? >>> >>> (i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the code/docs >>> but specific pointers would help.) >> How about using XEN. You can then virtualise multiple Linux >> boxes efficiently, and run a single XORP on each one. Ratul> i guess that (and other interface-level virtualization Ratul> mechanisms) is an option but i'd be more interested in Ratul> retaining the configuration of the experimenting machine and Ratul> play at a user-level if possible. Ratul> thanks. _______________________________________________ Ratul> Xorp-users mailing list Xorp-users@xorp.org Ratul> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From Chip.Wang@gdcanada.com Wed Aug 3 23:52:45 2005 From: Chip.Wang@gdcanada.com (Wang, Chip) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:52:45 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] Newbie problem with xorpsh Message-ID: <2142BCFA1F7F0D468F8EE6C8DE719E68CACBA6@CGYSVW100.gdcan.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5987E.10519CFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I installed xorp-1.1 on my UML setup. I compiled it separately for the = host and the guests. Xorp would start and run on my host and guests. I only configured the = RIP protocol. It appears to distribute the routes among all my virtual = (TAP) interfaces.=20 However, I could only use show interfaces in xorpsh. All other show = commands, including host rip route would produce ERROR: no matching command What was wrong? Chip The information contained in this e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may = contain confidential information and may be legally privileged. It is = intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the = intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = distribution or reproduction of this communication is strictly = prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a = transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender immediately = by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this message.=20 Thank you.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5987E.10519CFC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Newbie problem with xorpsh

I installed xorp-1.1 on my UML setup. I = compiled it separately for the host and the guests.
Xorp would start and run on my host = and guests. I only configured the RIP protocol. It appears to distribute = the routes among all my virtual (TAP) interfaces.

However, I could only use show = interfaces in xorpsh. All other show commands, including host rip route = would produce
        ERROR: no matching command

What was wrong?

Chip

The information contained in this = e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may contain confidential information and = may be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of the = addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby = notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this = communication is strictly prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) = cannot be reached or if a transmission problem has occurred, please = notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of = this message.
Thank you. =

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5987E.10519CFC-- From Chip.Wang@gdcanada.com Wed Aug 3 22:10:49 2005 From: Chip.Wang@gdcanada.com (Wang, Chip) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:10:49 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] Running XORP on UML? Message-ID: <2142BCFA1F7F0D468F8EE6C8DE719E68CACBA4@CGYSVW100.gdcan.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5986F.D2ABB31C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have a newbie question. Has anyone had any experience running XORP on = User Mode Linux? Do it work? I was wondering if it is possible to set up a virtual network testbed = with UML, and then run XORP on the guests and the host. I know IMUNES and Xen would be other options. However, my target system = is Linux 2.6.x. So a Linux based testbed is preferable. Thanks, Chip The information contained in this e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may = contain confidential information and may be legally privileged. It is = intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the = intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = distribution or reproduction of this communication is strictly = prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a = transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender immediately = by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this message.=20 Thank you.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5986F.D2ABB31C Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Running XORP on UML?

Hi,

I have a newbie question. Has anyone = had any experience running XORP on User Mode Linux? Do it work?
I was wondering if it is possible to = set up a virtual network testbed with UML, and then run XORP on the = guests and the host.

I know IMUNES and Xen would be other = options. However, my target system is Linux 2.6.x. So a Linux based = testbed is preferable.

Thanks,

Chip

The information contained in this = e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may contain confidential information and = may be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of the = addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby = notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this = communication is strictly prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) = cannot be reached or if a transmission problem has occurred, please = notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of = this message.
Thank you. =

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5986F.D2ABB31C-- From atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Thu Aug 4 04:54:57 2005 From: atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Atanu Ghosh) Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:54:57 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Newbie problem with xorpsh In-Reply-To: Message from "Wang, Chip" of "Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:52:45 MDT." <2142BCFA1F7F0D468F8EE6C8DE719E68CACBA6@CGYSVW100.gdcan.com> Message-ID: <42974.1123127697@tigger.icir.org> Hi, We don't have any experience with UML so its not clear what has failed. You should note that the xorpsh expects to see the same view of the file system that the rtrmgr sees. In particular the templates directory needs to be accessible, also many of the xorpsh commands run external programs. Is it possible that in your guest environment some of these files are missing? Atanu. >>>>> "Chip" == Chip Wang writes: Chip> I installed xorp-1.1 on my UML setup. I compiled it separately Chip> for the host and the guests. Xorp would start and run on my Chip> host and guests. I only configured the RIP protocol. It Chip> appears to distribute the routes among all my virtual (TAP) Chip> interfaces. Chip> However, I could only use show interfaces in xorpsh. All other Chip> show commands, including host rip route would produce         Chip> ERROR: no matching command Chip> What was wrong? Chip> Chip The information contained in this e-mail message is Chip> PRIVATE. It may contain confidential information and may be Chip> legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of Chip> the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you Chip> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or Chip> reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If Chip> the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a Chip> transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender Chip> immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this Chip> message. Chip> Thank you. From ratul@cs.washington.edu Thu Aug 4 07:45:22 2005 From: ratul@cs.washington.edu (Ratul Mahajan) Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:45:22 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host In-Reply-To: <16592.1123101683@tigger.icir.org> References: <16592.1123101683@tigger.icir.org> Message-ID: <42F1B982.8030400@cs.washington.edu> atanu - thanks for your response. i tried what you suggested and i get the following error on the second router instance. ----------- % XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 [.....................] [ 2005/08/03 23:38:09 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:738 LIBCOMM +177 comm_sock.c comm_sock_bind4 ] Error binding socket (family = 2, my_addr = 127.0.0.1, my_port = 19999): Address already in use [ 2005/08/03 23:38:09 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:738 RTRMGR +274 main_rtrmgr.cc run ] Address already in use: a finder may already be running. ------------ then, i tried the following, which did not work either. ------------ % XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 -p 20000 [.................] [ 2005/08/03 23:40:18 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:748 XrlFinderTarget +406 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:748 XrlFinderTarget +406 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "fea" does not exist or is not enabled. [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +1227 task.cc task_fail ] Shutting down fatally wounded process (interfaces) [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +216 module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: interfaces [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +262 module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: interfaces (pid = 749) [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +597 master_conf_tree.cc commit_pass2_done ] Commit failed: Can't validate config ready of process interfaces [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +182 master_conf_tree.cc config_done ] Configuration failed: Can't validate config ready of process interfaces [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +1420 task.cc run_task ] No more tasks to run [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +216 module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: interfaces [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +262 module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: interfaces (pid = 749) [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +547 module_manager.cc killed ] Module killed during shutdown: interfaces [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +262 module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: interfaces (pid = 749) [ 2005/08/03 23:40:21 FATAL xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +299 module_manager.cc terminate_with_prejudice ] Assertion (path_iter != module_paths.end()) failed Aborted --------------------- i am using release 1.1. (in case your instructions work only with the current code). thanks. Atanu Ghosh wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently been experimenting with imunes > . Imunes allows the creation of multiple network > stacks on a single host. Currently Imunes only works on FreeBSD 4.11 and > requires kernel modifications. I have built a FreeBSD 4.11 system inside > vmware applied the kernel patches and built XORP. My very limited > experiments have worked well. Multiple instances of XORP can be run on a > single host each on its own network stack. Therefore no modifications to > XORP. > > If you want to run multiple instance of XORP/BGP on one host the > instructions are below. > > NOTE: BGP IS THE ONLY PROTOCOL THAT CAN BE RUN THIS WAY. > > Atanu. > ======================================== > > 1) Modify the template files to run the dummy fea rather than the real > fea. Otherwise multiple processes will attempt to modify the routing > table. In xorp/etc/templates run the script below or modify the > templates manually. > > ---------------------------------------- > #!/bin/sh > > grep -l \"fea/xorp_fea\" * | > while read name > do > echo $name > ed $name <<\! > 1,$s/"fea\/xorp_fea"/"fea\/xorp_fea_dummy"/ > wq > ! > done > ---------------------------------------- > > 2) Create the router configuration files. The BGP protocol requires > that port 179 is used TCP sessions. As our regression tests run on a > single host our BGP can be configured to use any port. > > Below is the configuration for two XORP instances on a single host: > > CONFIG1 > ---------------------------------------- > interfaces { > interface dc0 { > vif dc0 { > disable: false > address 10.10.10.1 { > prefix-length: 24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > } > } > > protocols { > bgp { > bgp-id: 10.10.10.1 > local-as: 65001 > > peer 127.0.0.1 { > local-ip: 127.0.0.1 > as: 65002 > next-hop: 10.10.10.1 > > local-port: 2001 > peer-port: 2002 > } > > /* Introduce a route */ > network4 10.10.10.0/24 { > next-hop: 10.10.10.1 > unicast: true > multicast: true > } > > } > } > ---------------------------------------- > > CONFIG2 > ---------------------------------------- > interfaces { > interface dc0 { > vif dc0 { > disable: false > address 10.10.10.2 { > prefix-length: 24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > } > } > > protocols { > bgp { > bgp-id: 10.10.10.2 > local-as: 65002 > > peer 127.0.0.1 { > local-ip: 127.0.0.1 > as: 65001 > next-hop: 10.10.10.2 > > local-port: 2002 > peer-port: 2001 > > } > } > } > ---------------------------------------- > > 3) The different processes that make up a XORP router communicate with > each other using a default port. This port number can be changed using > the enviroment variable "XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT". > > Start two instances of XORP in separate shells: > XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7001 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG1 > XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 > > Either XORP router instance can now be communicated with by setting > the appropriate enviroment varaiable. Note that router2 has the route > introduced by router1. > > ---------------------------------------- > emu$ XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorpsh > Welcome to XORP on emu.icir.org > Xorp> show bgp routes > Status Codes: * valid route, > best route > Origin Codes: i IGP, e EGP, ? incomplete > > Prefix Nexthop Peer AS Path > ------ ------- ---- ------- > *> 10.10.10.0/24 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.1 65001 ? > Xorp> > ---------------------------------------- > ======================================== > > >>>>>>"Ratul" == Ratul Mahajan writes: > > > Ratul> James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > >> On 8/1/05, Ratul Mahajan wrote: > >> > >>> > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the same > >>> machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer > >>> address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to > >>> experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. > >>> But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward > >>> packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing > >>> experiments, not a general solution. > >>> > >>> so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? > >>> > >>> (i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the code/docs > >>> but specific pointers would help.) > >> How about using XEN. You can then virtualise multiple Linux > >> boxes efficiently, and run a single XORP on each one. > > Ratul> i guess that (and other interface-level virtualization > Ratul> mechanisms) is an option but i'd be more interested in > Ratul> retaining the configuration of the experimenting machine and > Ratul> play at a user-level if possible. > > Ratul> thanks. _______________________________________________ > Ratul> Xorp-users mailing list Xorp-users@xorp.org > Ratul> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Thu Aug 4 16:16:41 2005 From: atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Atanu Ghosh) Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 08:16:41 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Emulating multiple routers on the same host In-Reply-To: Message from Ratul Mahajan of "Wed, 03 Aug 2005 23:45:22 PDT." <42F1B982.8030400@cs.washington.edu> Message-ID: <49547.1123168601@tigger.icir.org> Hi, Setting the environment variable XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT hasn't worked. The default port number is 19999, which is the port number in the error message. The first XORP instance has started with the default port number and the second has failed as it has clashed with the first. The changes went in after the 1.1 release. Updating these two files and recompiling may work for you: Revison 1.12 finder_server.cc Revison 1.47 xrl_router.cc Atanu. >>>>> "Ratul" == Ratul Mahajan writes: Ratul> atanu - Ratul> thanks for your response. Ratul> i tried what you suggested and i get the following error on the second Ratul> router instance. Ratul> ----------- Ratul> % XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 Ratul> [.....................] Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:38:09 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:738 LIBCOMM +177 comm_sock.c Ratul> comm_sock_bind4 ] Error binding socket (family = 2, my_addr = Ratul> 127.0.0.1, my_port = 19999): Address already in use Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:38:09 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:738 RTRMGR +274 Ratul> main_rtrmgr.cc run ] Address already in use: a finder may already be Ratul> running. Ratul> ------------ Ratul> then, i tried the following, which did not work either. Ratul> ------------ Ratul> % XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 -p 20000 Ratul> [.................] Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:18 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:748 XrlFinderTarget +406 Ratul> ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling Ratul> method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command Ratul> failed [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:748 XrlFinderTarget Ratul> +406 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Ratul> Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Ratul> Command failed Target "fea" does not exist or is not enabled. Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +1227 task.cc Ratul> task_fail ] Shutting down fatally wounded process (interfaces) Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +216 Ratul> module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: interfaces Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +262 Ratul> module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: interfaces (pid = 749) Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +597 Ratul> master_conf_tree.cc commit_pass2_done ] Commit failed: Can't validate Ratul> config ready of process interfaces Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +182 Ratul> master_conf_tree.cc config_done ] Configuration failed: Can't validate Ratul> config ready of process interfaces Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +1420 task.cc Ratul> run_task ] No more tasks to run Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +216 Ratul> module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: interfaces Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +262 Ratul> module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: interfaces (pid = 749) Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +547 Ratul> module_manager.cc killed ] Module killed during shutdown: interfaces Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:19 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +262 Ratul> module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: interfaces (pid = 749) Ratul> [ 2005/08/03 23:40:21 FATAL xorp_rtrmgr:748 RTRMGR +299 Ratul> module_manager.cc terminate_with_prejudice ] Assertion (path_iter != Ratul> module_paths.end()) failed Ratul> Aborted Ratul> --------------------- Ratul> i am using release 1.1. (in case your instructions work only with the Ratul> current code). Ratul> thanks. Ratul> Atanu Ghosh wrote: >> Hi, >> I have recently been experimenting with imunes >> . Imunes allows the creation of multiple network >> stacks on a single host. Currently Imunes only works on FreeBSD 4.11 and >> requires kernel modifications. I have built a FreeBSD 4.11 system inside >> vmware applied the kernel patches and built XORP. My very limited >> experiments have worked well. Multiple instances of XORP can be run on a >> single host each on its own network stack. Therefore no modifications to >> XORP. >> If you want to run multiple instance of XORP/BGP on one host the >> instructions are below. >> NOTE: BGP IS THE ONLY PROTOCOL THAT CAN BE RUN THIS WAY. >> Atanu. >> ======================================== >> 1) Modify the template files to run the dummy fea rather than the >> real >> fea. Otherwise multiple processes will attempt to modify the routing >> table. In xorp/etc/templates run the script below or modify the >> templates manually. >> ---------------------------------------- >> #!/bin/sh >> grep -l \"fea/xorp_fea\" * | >> while read name >> do >> echo $name >> ed $name <<\! >> 1,$s/"fea\/xorp_fea"/"fea\/xorp_fea_dummy"/ >> wq >> ! >> done >> ---------------------------------------- >> 2) Create the router configuration files. The BGP protocol requires >> that port 179 is used TCP sessions. As our regression tests run on a >> single host our BGP can be configured to use any port. >> Below is the configuration for two XORP instances on a single host: >> CONFIG1 >> ---------------------------------------- >> interfaces { >> interface dc0 { >> vif dc0 { >> disable: false >> address 10.10.10.1 { >> prefix-length: 24 >> broadcast: 10.10.10.255 >> disable: false >> } >> } >> } >> } >> protocols { >> bgp { >> bgp-id: 10.10.10.1 >> local-as: 65001 >> peer 127.0.0.1 { >> local-ip: 127.0.0.1 >> as: 65002 >> next-hop: 10.10.10.1 >> local-port: 2001 >> peer-port: 2002 >> } >> /* Introduce a route */ >> network4 10.10.10.0/24 { >> next-hop: 10.10.10.1 >> unicast: true >> multicast: true >> } >> >> } >> } >> ---------------------------------------- >> CONFIG2 >> ---------------------------------------- >> interfaces { >> interface dc0 { >> vif dc0 { >> disable: false >> address 10.10.10.2 { >> prefix-length: 24 >> broadcast: 10.10.10.255 >> disable: false >> } >> } >> } >> } >> protocols { >> bgp { >> bgp-id: 10.10.10.2 >> local-as: 65002 >> peer 127.0.0.1 { >> local-ip: 127.0.0.1 >> as: 65001 >> next-hop: 10.10.10.2 >> local-port: 2002 >> peer-port: 2001 >> } >> } >> } >> ---------------------------------------- >> 3) The different processes that make up a XORP router communicate >> with >> each other using a default port. This port number can be changed using >> the enviroment variable "XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT". >> Start two instances of XORP in separate shells: >> XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7001 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG1 >> XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorp_rtrmgr -b CONFIG2 >> Either XORP router instance can now be communicated with by setting >> the appropriate enviroment varaiable. Note that router2 has the route >> introduced by router1. >> ---------------------------------------- >> emu$ XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT=7002 ./xorpsh >> Welcome to XORP on emu.icir.org Xorp> show bgp routes Status Codes: * valid route, > best route >> Origin Codes: i IGP, e EGP, ? incomplete >> Prefix Nexthop Peer >> AS Path >> ------ ------- ---- ------- >> *> 10.10.10.0/24 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.1 65001 ? Xorp> ---------------------------------------- >> ======================================== >> >>>>>>> "Ratul" == Ratul Mahajan writes: Ratul> James Courtier-Dutton wrote: >> >> On 8/1/05, Ratul Mahajan wrote: >> >> >>> > You can currently run multiple BGP instances on the >> same >> >>> machine, as > BGP uses TCP, and you can configure the peer >> >>> address and port on a > per-peer basis. So if you want to >> >>> experiment with BGP, this is > possible without code changes. >> >>> But the resulting virtual routers > won't actually forward >> >>> packets to each other, so this is only useful > for routing >> >>> experiments, not a general solution. >> >>> >>> so whats the simplest way to accomplish this? >> >>> >>> (i realize that the answer is there somewhere in the >> code/docs >> >>> but specific pointers would help.) >> >> How about using XEN. You can then virtualise multiple Linux >> >> boxes efficiently, and run a single XORP on each one. Ratul> i guess that (and other interface-level virtualization Ratul> mechanisms) is an option but i'd be more interested in Ratul> retaining the configuration of the experimenting machine and Ratul> play at a user-level if possible. Ratul> thanks. _______________________________________________ Ratul> Xorp-users mailing list Xorp-users@xorp.org Ratul> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From John.Sheahan@priceline.com Thu Aug 4 17:06:43 2005 From: John.Sheahan@priceline.com (Sheahan, John) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] Hardware Question Message-ID: <11466E8BCEC03C4799052D0695C891F20482F4AF@nw-exmb-004-gig> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5990E.81AA11E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm new to XORP and wanted to clear up my first question...where do I get the typical types of hardware interfaces that a router would need such as serial, HSSI etc... and how much do they cost for a PC? =20 Thanks ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5990E.81AA11E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I’m new to XORP and wanted to clear up my first question…where do I get the typical types of hardware interfaces = that a router would need such as serial, HSSI etc… and how much do they = cost for a PC?

 

Thanks

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5990E.81AA11E0-- From kristian@juniks.net Thu Aug 4 18:50:09 2005 From: kristian@juniks.net (Kristian Larsson) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 19:50:09 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] Hardware Question In-Reply-To: <20050804162405.GC7520@juniks.net> References: <11466E8BCEC03C4799052D0695C891F20482F4AF@nw-exmb-004-gig> <20050804162405.GC7520@juniks.net> Message-ID: <20050804175009.GB7666@juniks.net> First of all, xorp merely sits on top of your os and speaks a few different routing protocols such as OSPF and BGP. It really has nothing to do with the interfaces. Five years ago, a T1/E1 interface would be typical to have for a small router and a HSSI for a larger one. Nowadays (at least here in Sweden) we don't use those anymore. Almost all equipment have (Fast)Ethernet either copper or fibre based. But I bet that wasn't the answer you were looking for. I've used sbeis products (http://www.sbei.net/). They're rather expensive, but all HSSI products are. The prices today are far from what they were when I bought them so I can't even begin guessing but they're not on the level with youre average NIC ;) Check out their site and you should be able to locate a reseller. Hope it helps. /Kristian On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:06:43PM -0400, Sheahan, John wrote: > > I'm new to XORP and wanted to clear up my first question...where do I > > get the typical types of hardware interfaces that a router would need > > such as serial, HSSI etc... and how much do they cost for a PC? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > From kristian@juniks.net Thu Aug 4 19:04:42 2005 From: kristian@juniks.net (Kristian Larsson) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 20:04:42 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] Hardware Question In-Reply-To: <11466E8BCEC03C4799052D0695C891F20D88DD@nw-exmb-004-gig> References: <11466E8BCEC03C4799052D0695C891F20D88DD@nw-exmb-004-gig> Message-ID: <20050804180442.GC7666@juniks.net> Whops, I messed up a bit there (forgot cc:ing the list).... anyway, I think (and this is more of a gut feeling than hard facts) that most people that use xorp at all use it for testing and development. I myself would not put xorp in production yet, mostly because I need support for both OSPF and BGP. XORP lack neither but the BGP policy framework is brand new and this is something I use quite heavily and thus I need it to be rock solid. Don't get me wrong, xorp is still a great piece of software and I'm following it's progress very closely. According to the roadmap, version 1.2 should be released in August. Hopefully it will and hopefully it will support bgp policies and be quite stable at it. I will probably put it in a "production-test" at a less crucial point in my network to see how it behaves. You should try it out for yourself and listen to others experiences. Regards, Kristian On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Sheahan, John wrote: > Thanks for the site...that definitely answered my question. > > I was wondering if there is currently anyone who is running XORP on > routers in a production network consisting of 30 or more routers? I'm > just trying to get a feel of the role XORP is currently playing. > > thanks > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kristian Larsson [mailto:kristian@juniks.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 12:24 PM > To: Sheahan, John > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] Hardware Question > > First of all, xorp merely sits on top of your os and speaks a few > different > routing protocols such as OSPF and BGP. It really has nothing to do with > the > interfaces. > > Five years ago, a T1/E1 interface would be typical to have for a small > router > and a HSSI for a larger one. Nowadays (at least here in Sweden) we don't > use > those anymore. Almost all equipment have (Fast)Ethernet either copper or > fibre based. But I bet that wasn't the answer you were looking for. > > I've used sbeis products (http://www.sbei.net/). They're rather > expensive, > but all HSSI products are. The prices today are far from what they were > when > I bought them so I can't even begin guessing but they're not on the > level > with youre average NIC ;) > Check out their site and you should be able to locate a reseller. > > Hope it helps. > /Kristian > > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:06:43PM -0400, Sheahan, John wrote: > > I'm new to XORP and wanted to clear up my first question...where do I > > get the typical types of hardware interfaces that a router would need > > such as serial, HSSI etc... and how much do they cost for a PC? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > From Chip.Wang@gdcanada.com Mon Aug 8 19:52:16 2005 From: Chip.Wang@gdcanada.com (Wang, Chip) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:52:16 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] How to configure XORP to use Click Message-ID: <2142BCFA1F7F0D468F8EE6C8DE719E68CACBA7@CGYSVW100.gdcan.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C59C4A.4C22C1D4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am trying to get my xorp to run with Click FEA. Is there any information on how to configure XORP to run with user level = Click forwarding? Thanks, Chip The information contained in this e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may = contain confidential information and may be legally privileged. It is = intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the = intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, = distribution or reproduction of this communication is strictly = prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a = transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender immediately = by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this message.=20 Thank you.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C59C4A.4C22C1D4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How to configure XORP to use Click

Hi,

I am trying to get my xorp to run with = Click FEA.
Is there any information on how to = configure XORP to run with user level Click forwarding?
Thanks,

Chip

The information contained in this = e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may contain confidential information and = may be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of the = addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby = notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this = communication is strictly prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) = cannot be reached or if a transmission problem has occurred, please = notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of = this message.
Thank you. =

------_=_NextPart_001_01C59C4A.4C22C1D4-- From atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Mon Aug 8 23:17:54 2005 From: atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Atanu Ghosh) Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 15:17:54 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] How to configure XORP to use Click In-Reply-To: Message from "Wang, Chip" of "Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:52:16 MDT." <2142BCFA1F7F0D468F8EE6C8DE719E68CACBA7@CGYSVW100.gdcan.com> Message-ID: <68283.1123539474@tigger.icir.org> Hi, The configuration file "config.boot.sample" contains an example of how to configure xorp to use a user level click. An external script is invoked in order to generate the click config, an example of such a script is "xorp_fea_click_config_generator". Atanu. >>>>> "Chip" == Chip Wang writes: Chip> Hi, Chip> I am trying to get my xorp to run with Click FEA. Is there Chip> any information on how to configure XORP to run with user Chip> level Click forwarding? Thanks, Chip> Chip The information contained in this e-mail message is Chip> PRIVATE. It may contain confidential information and may be Chip> legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of Chip> the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you Chip> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or Chip> reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If Chip> the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a Chip> transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender Chip> immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this Chip> message. Chip> Thank you. From james.dutton@gmail.com Sun Aug 14 21:51:19 2005 From: james.dutton@gmail.com (James Courtier-Dutton) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:51:19 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Unable to forward multicast packets In-Reply-To: <200507272017.j6RKHWjs022628@virtc.com> References: <200507262159.j6QLx8qb044655@possum.icir.org> <200507272017.j6RKHWjs022628@virtc.com> Message-ID: On 7/27/05, batkinson wrote: > Pavlin, > > >>One possible problem that comes to mind is that the original > >>multicast packets are probably transmitted with the default TTL of > >>1. > >>TTL of 1 is sufficient for link-local multicast, but such multicast > >>packets won't be forwarded across subnets. > >> > >>Try to increase the TTL of the transmitted data packets and see if > >>the problem goes away. > > My test app has a command line switch to change the default of TTL=1, but I > was not using it. I increased the TTL, and now everything is working as > expected. > > Thank you very much for your valuable and prompt assistance with my problem. > > Best Regards, > > Brian D. Atkinson > Technical Lead Engineer > Virtual Technology Corporation > Orlando, FL USA > The two most common problems for multicast traffic failing to be forwarded are: 1) TTL=1 2) RPF checks fail (Reverse Path Forwarding) From xorp@temp.spb.ru Mon Aug 15 20:06:03 2005 From: xorp@temp.spb.ru (Alexander Kolesnik) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:06:03 +0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] xorp configuration question Message-ID: <167581816.20050815230603@kolesnik.spb.ru> Hello, I'm trying to implement the following configuration: I've a router with CentOS 4 installed. The bonding is configured and iptables/cbq/quagga are running. bond1 - is the interface where clients subnets are terminated on configured subinterfaces (approx. 20 subinterfaces). Only IPv4 is supported. I would like to install and run XORP for multicast traffic routing between clients (bond1) and other network (bond0) (bond0 is not configured now in XORP, I know; this will be the next step). Here is my config.boot: interfaces { interface bond1 { description: "data interface" disable: false default-system-config } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { disable: false } unicast-forwarding6 { disable: true } } plumbing { mfea4 { disable: false interface bond1 { vif bond1 { disable: false } } interface register_vif { vif register_vif { disable: false } } traceoptions { flag { all { disable: false } } } } } protocols { igmp { disable: false interface bond1 { vif bond1 { disable: false } } traceoptions { flag { all { disable: false } } } } pimsm4 { disable: false interface bond1 { vif bond1 { disable: false dr-priority: 1 } } interface register_vif { vif register_vif { disable: false dr-priority: 1 } } static-rps { rp 192.168.30.225 { group-prefix 224.0.0.0/4 { rp-priority: 192 hash-mask-len: 30 } } } bootstrap { disable: false cand-bsr { scope-zone 224.0.0.0/4 { cand-bsr-by-vif-name: "bond1" is-scope-zone: false bsr-priority: 1 hash-mask-len: 30 } } cand-rp { group-prefix 224.0.0.0/4 { cand-rp-by-vif-name: "bond1" is-scope-zone: false rp-priority: 192 rp-holdtime: 150 } } } switch-to-spt-threshold { disable: false interval-sec: 100 bytes: 102400 } traceoptions { flag { all { disable: false } } } } fib2mrib { disable: false } } 192.168.30.225/24 - is the main address of bond1. Output of `xorprtr_mgr -v' may be found here: http://awanti.com/xorp.debug The problematic places in that output are delimited with '---'. So, the questions are: 1. What 'no interface found' means? What cannot be found and why? 2. Why 'Target "fea" does not exist or is not enabled' message comes up? The fea part is actually configured. 3. 'Target "IGMP" does not exist or is not enabled'. The same question. 4. What 'RX packet from 192.168.25.227 to 239.255.255.250: no vif found' means? How to configure XORP to understand that traffic? Thank you for help in advance! -- Best regards, Alexander From John.Weaver@motorola.com Tue Aug 16 20:09:06 2005 From: John.Weaver@motorola.com (Weaver John-JWEAVER1) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] openssl Message-ID: <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB15DCF@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> Would there be a problem using openssl 0.9.7b? John From pavlin@icir.org Tue Aug 16 20:19:48 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:19:48 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] openssl In-Reply-To: Message from Weaver John-JWEAVER1 of "Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:09:06 CDT." <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB15DCF@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> Message-ID: <200508161919.j7GJJmI3087399@possum.icir.org> > Would there be a problem using openssl 0.9.7b? The version we use on our FreeBSD-4.10 boxes is 0.9.7d. I am not familiar with openssl, but after looking into the changes between 0.9.7b and 0.9.7d (as described in the CHANGES file with the openssl-0.9.7d.tar.gz tarball), there was nothing that indicates there would be problems for using the slightly older 0.9.7b version. Pavlin From bms@spc.org Wed Aug 17 09:14:56 2005 From: bms@spc.org (Bruce M Simpson) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:14:56 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] openssl In-Reply-To: <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB15DCF@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> References: <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB15DCF@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> Message-ID: <20050817081456.GA6988@empiric.icir.org> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:09:06PM -0500, Weaver John-JWEAVER1 wrote: > Would there be a problem using openssl 0.9.7b? As far as I know we just use the MD5 routines from libcrypto, and they won't have changed too much between releases... BMS From John.Weaver@motorola.com Wed Aug 17 17:42:50 2005 From: John.Weaver@motorola.com (Weaver John-JWEAVER1) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:42:50 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] SNMP Message-ID: <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB6546B@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> Is SNMP necessary to run XORP? It appears that we cannot get Net-SNMP to work on the PPC. John Weaver From pavlin@icir.org Wed Aug 17 17:54:51 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:54:51 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] SNMP In-Reply-To: Message from Weaver John-JWEAVER1 of "Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:42:50 CDT." <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB6546B@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> Message-ID: <200508171654.j7HGspEX073894@possum.icir.org> > Is SNMP necessary to run XORP? It appears that we cannot get Net-SNMP to No. Only if you use the "--with-snmp" switch to ./configure it will be compiled. And even then you can run the rest of XORP without SNMP. > work on the PPC. What are the particular issues you are running into? Admittably, ourselves we are using SNMP only from time-to-time, and there could be some issues that haven't been noticed so far. Pavlin From John.Weaver@motorola.com Wed Aug 17 19:20:55 2005 From: John.Weaver@motorola.com (Weaver John-JWEAVER1) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] SNMP Message-ID: <0DFC73466514D41186B700508B9510411BB65680@tx14exm04.ftw.mot.com> Not really sure what the issues are. The people responsible for putting together the Linux package said they never could get the Net to work just the UDC. -----Original Message----- From: Pavlin Radoslavov [mailto:pavlin@icir.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:55 AM To: Weaver John-JWEAVER1 Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov; xorp-users@xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] SNMP > Is SNMP necessary to run XORP? It appears that we cannot get Net-SNMP > to No. Only if you use the "--with-snmp" switch to ./configure it will be compiled. And even then you can run the rest of XORP without SNMP. > work on the PPC. What are the particular issues you are running into? Admittably, ourselves we are using SNMP only from time-to-time, and there could be some issues that haven't been noticed so far. Pavlin From adam@hiddennet.net Wed Aug 17 15:11:33 2005 From: adam@hiddennet.net (Adam Greenhalgh) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:11:33 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] emulating configure --prefix at run time Message-ID: <43034595.3050900@hiddennet.net> hi is there any way to emulate the --prefix option to configure at run time so that i can change $PATH and another environment to use different versions of xorp . I sort of remember something like XORP_HOME as an option in the path . Adam From pavlin@icir.org Wed Aug 17 22:59:37 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:59:37 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] emulating configure --prefix at run time In-Reply-To: Message from Adam Greenhalgh of "Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:11:33 BST." <43034595.3050900@hiddennet.net> Message-ID: <200508172159.j7HLxbYG026923@possum.icir.org> > hi > > is there any way to emulate the --prefix option to configure at run > time so that i can change $PATH and another environment to use different > versions of xorp . I sort of remember something like XORP_HOME as an > option in the path . What about the XORP_ROOT environmental variable? You also have the "-t " and "-x " rtrmgr options to specify the rtrmgr template and XRL target directories respectively. Pavlin From atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU Tue Aug 23 00:42:36 2005 From: atanu@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Atanu Ghosh) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:42:36 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Power outage Message-ID: <43046.1124754156@tigger.icir.org> Hi, The Pacific Gas and Electric Company are going to depriving us of power for a four hour period. The main web server, cvs archive and email lists will be unavailable from 20:00PDT today (22th August) and hopefully they will be powered back up at 9.00PDT tomorrow (23th August). Mirrors of the web server (e.g. www2.xorp.org) will obviously be available, but the cvs archive and email lists will not. Sorry for the inconvenience. Atanu. From caldwell_jason@bah.com Wed Aug 24 21:45:04 2005 From: caldwell_jason@bah.com (Caldwell Jason) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP Development Roadmap Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A8EC.B5CD98FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pavlin, =20 I just have a general question about the development roadmap, is there a document that describes the differences or added capabilities between the different the current and future releases..?? =20 Thanks, Jason =20 ~~~~~~~ Jason Caldwell=20 Booz | Allen | Hamilton=20 900 Elkridge Landing Road (Office 322)=20 Linthicum, MD 21090=20 410.684.6567 Office=20 Caldwell_Jason@bah.com=20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A8EC.B5CD98FC Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pavlin,
 
I just = have a=20 general question about the development roadmap, is there a = document that=20 describes the differences or added capabilities between the different = the=20 current and future releases..??
 
Thanks,=20 Jason
 
~~~~~~~
Jason Caldwell =
Booz |=20 Allen | Hamilton
900 Elkridge Landing Road (Office 322) =
Linthicum, MD=20 21090
410.684.6567 Office
Caldwell_Jason@bah.com =
 
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A8EC.B5CD98FC-- From pavlin@icir.org Wed Aug 24 22:09:20 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:09:20 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP Development Roadmap In-Reply-To: Message from "Caldwell Jason" of "Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:45:04 EDT." Message-ID: <200508242109.j7OL9KOw036229@possum.icir.org> [Note: xorp-announce@xorp.org is removed from the CC list because it is a read-only ML and is used only for announcements from the XORP team] > I just have a general question about the development roadmap, is there a > document that describes the differences or added capabilities between > the different the current and future releases..?? There is no detailed document that describes our future plans. The XORP roadmap web page (http://www.xorp.org/roadmap.html) is the closest to such document. In addition, the next 1.2 release will contain the new policy support. Please let us know if you have any specific questions about particular capabilities. Pavlin From caldwell_jason@bah.com Wed Aug 24 22:38:00 2005 From: caldwell_jason@bah.com (Caldwell Jason) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP Development Roadmap Message-ID: Pavlin, My question wasn't meant to be specific nor does this have to be anything formal, but can you tell me what additional features or capabilities that either going be add or improved upon in the next release..?? (example; adding of a routing protocols, web base management, patches) Based off of the roadmap web page the next release is 1.2 in August, can you tell me what the differences are between 1.1 and 1.2, and the same question applies the other future releases, 1.2 -1.3 and 1.3-1.4... Thanks again, Jason -----Original Message----- From: Pavlin Radoslavov [mailto:pavlin@icir.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:09 PM To: Caldwell Jason Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov; xorp-users@xorp.org; Foy Joseph; Melendez Francisco Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] XORP Development Roadmap [Note: xorp-announce@xorp.org is removed from the CC list because it is a read-only ML and is used only for announcements from the XORP team] > I just have a general question about the development roadmap, is there > a document that describes the differences or added capabilities > between the different the current and future releases..?? There is no detailed document that describes our future plans. The XORP roadmap web page (http://www.xorp.org/roadmap.html) is the closest to such document. In addition, the next 1.2 release will contain the new policy support. Please let us know if you have any specific questions about particular capabilities. Pavlin From pavlin@icir.org Wed Aug 24 22:57:38 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:57:38 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP Development Roadmap In-Reply-To: Message from "Caldwell Jason" of "Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:38:00 EDT." Message-ID: <200508242157.j7OLvc2T038321@possum.icir.org> > My question wasn't meant to be specific nor does this have to be > anything formal, but can you tell me what additional features or > capabilities that either going be add or improved upon in the next > release..?? (example; adding of a routing protocols, web base > management, patches) > > Based off of the roadmap web page the next release is 1.2 in August, can > you tell me what the differences are between 1.1 and 1.2, and the same > question applies the other future releases, 1.2 -1.3 and 1.3-1.4... I may be misunderstanding your question, because the XORP roadmap web page already provides the new major features that are to be expected in each new release: * XORP-1.2: (stable) routing policy, initial OSPF implementation, Windows support * XORP-1.3: completed Windows support * XORP-1.4: initial IS-IS implementation, IGMPv3/MLDv2 implementation, Bidirectional PIM-SM implementation. We don't have specific information about improving existing features because this is an ongoing process. If you are interested about changes between previous releases, file xorp/RELEASE_NOTES contains detailed info about such changes. Pavlin > > > Thanks again, Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavlin Radoslavov [mailto:pavlin@icir.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:09 PM > To: Caldwell Jason > Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov; xorp-users@xorp.org; Foy Joseph; Melendez > Francisco > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] XORP Development Roadmap > > [Note: xorp-announce@xorp.org is removed from the CC list because it is > a read-only ML and is used only for announcements from the XORP team] > > > I just have a general question about the development roadmap, is there > > > a document that describes the differences or added capabilities > > between the different the current and future releases..?? > > There is no detailed document that describes our future plans. > The XORP roadmap web page (http://www.xorp.org/roadmap.html) is the > closest to such document. In addition, the next 1.2 release will contain > the new policy support. > > Please let us know if you have any specific questions about particular > capabilities. > > Pavlin > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users@xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com Thu Aug 25 16:02:28 2005 From: sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com (sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:32:28 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode Message-ID: <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF501E65AA5@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A986.02A6F95D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Friends, I am new to Xorp Router.I have downloaded and complied the code.I am not able to enter to configuration mode even if I run xorpsh from user who is part of Xorp group. I would like to know what is the problem.Is there anything missing? =0D I have pasted the output below =0D Best regards, Sudheer =0D [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ whoami sudheer [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ls -l xorpsh -rwxrwxrwx 1 sudheer xorp 15108507 Aug 25 16:55 xorpsh [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ groups sudheer sudheer : xorp [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ./xorpsh Welcome to XORP on NPE Xorp> configure ERROR: You do not have permission for this operation.. Xorp> Confidentiality Notice=0D The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A986.02A6F95D Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hi=0D Friends,
I am new= to Xorp=0D Router.I have downloaded and complied the code.I am not able to enter to=0D configuration mode even if I run xorpsh from user who is part of Xorp=0D group.
I would= like to know=0D what is the problem.Is there anything missing?
 
I have= pasted the=0D output below
 
Best=0D regards,
Sudheer
 
[sudheer@NPE=0D rtrmgr]$ whoami
sudheer
[sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ls -l=0D xorpsh
-rwxrwxrwx    1 sudheer =0D xorp     15108507 Aug 25 16:55 xorpsh
[sudheer@NPE=0D rtrmgr]$ groups sudheer
sudheer : xorp
[sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$=0D ./xorpsh
Welcome to XORP on NPE
Xorp> configure
ERROR: You do= not=0D have permission for this=0D operation..
Xorp>


Confidentiality Notice

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A986.02A6F95D-- From sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com Thu Aug 25 16:15:13 2005 From: sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com (sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:45:13 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] configuration mode Message-ID: <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF501E65AA7@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A987.CAA49BDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Friends, I am new to Xorp Router.I have downloaded and complied the code.I am not able to enter to configuration mode even if I run xorpsh from user who is part of Xorp group. I would like to know what is the problem.Is there anything missing? =0D I have pasted the output below =0D Best regards, Sudheer =0D [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ whoami sudheer [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ls -l xorpsh -rwxrwxrwx 1 sudheer xorp 15108507 Aug 25 16:55 xorpsh [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ groups sudheer sudheer : xorp [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ./xorpsh Welcome to XORP on NPE Xorp> configure ERROR: You do not have permission for this operation.. Xorp> Confidentiality Notice=0D The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A987.CAA49BDC Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Hi=0D Friends,
I am new= to Xorp=0D Router.I have downloaded and complied the code.I am not able to enter to=0D configuration mode even if I run xorpsh from user who is part of Xorp=0D group.
I would= like to know=0D what is the problem.Is there anything missing?
 
I have= pasted the=0D output below
 
Best=0D regards,
Sudheer
 
[sudheer@NPE=0D rtrmgr]$ whoami
sudheer
[sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ls -l=0D xorpsh
-rwxrwxrwx    1 sudheer =0D xorp     15108507 Aug 25 16:55 xorpsh
[sudheer@NPE=0D rtrmgr]$ groups sudheer
sudheer : xorp
[sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$=0D ./xorpsh
Welcome to XORP on NPE
Xorp> configure
ERROR: You do= not=0D have permission for this=0D operation..
Xorp>


Confidentiality Notice

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to= this message are intended
for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or= privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or= Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately
and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5A987.CAA49BDC-- From pavlin@icir.org Fri Aug 26 01:15:35 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:15:35 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode In-Reply-To: Message from of "Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:32:28 +0530." <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF501E65AA5@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> Message-ID: <200508260015.j7Q0FZsO083838@possum.icir.org> > I am new to Xorp Router.I have downloaded and complied the code.I am not > able to enter to configuration mode even if I run xorpsh from user who > is part of Xorp group. > I would like to know what is the problem.Is there anything missing? > =0D > I have pasted the output below > =0D > Best regards, > Sudheer > =0D > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ whoami > sudheer > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ls -l xorpsh > -rwxrwxrwx 1 sudheer xorp 15108507 Aug 25 16:55 xorpsh > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ groups sudheer > sudheer : xorp > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ./xorpsh > Welcome to XORP on NPE > Xorp> configure > ERROR: You do not have permission for this operation.. > Xorp> What version of XORP are you using and what OS? If I remember correctly, there was a related bug (triggered under certain circumstances) that was fixed after release 1.1. Hence can you get the most recent version from anon. CVS (http://www.xorp.org/cvs.html) and try it. Pavlin From sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com Fri Aug 26 05:37:23 2005 From: sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com (sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:07:23 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode Message-ID: <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF501E65AA8@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> Hi, Thanks Pavilin. I am using XORP version 1.1 and Red hat linux release 9. I tried to checkout xorp from CVS and I could not.. [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ setenv CVSROOT :pserver:xorpcvs@cvs.xorp.org:/cvs [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ cvs login Logging in to :pserver:xorpcvs@cvs.xorp.org:2401/cvs CVS password: Unknown host cvs.xorp.org. [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ Which is latest version of XORP in which this BUG is fixed and how can I get it ? Thanks and regards, Sudheer -----Original Message----- From: Pavlin Radoslavov [mailto:pavlin@icir.org] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 5:46 AM To: Sudheer Kalyanashetty (WT01 - Semiconductors & Consumer Electronics) Cc: xorp-users@xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode > I am new to Xorp Router.I have downloaded and complied the code.I am > not able to enter to configuration mode even if I run xorpsh from user > who is part of Xorp group. I would like to know what is the problem.Is > there anything missing? =0D > I have pasted the output below > =0D > Best regards, > Sudheer > =0D > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ whoami > sudheer > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ls -l xorpsh > -rwxrwxrwx 1 sudheer xorp 15108507 Aug 25 16:55 xorpsh > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ groups sudheer > sudheer : xorp > [sudheer@NPE rtrmgr]$ ./xorpsh > Welcome to XORP on NPE > Xorp> configure > ERROR: You do not have permission for this operation.. > Xorp> What version of XORP are you using and what OS? If I remember correctly, there was a related bug (triggered under certain circumstances) that was fixed after release 1.1. Hence can you get the most recent version from anon. CVS (http://www.xorp.org/cvs.html) and try it. Pavlin Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. From pavlin@icir.org Fri Aug 26 08:22:43 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:22:43 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode In-Reply-To: Message from of "Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:07:23 +0530." <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF501E65AA8@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> Message-ID: <200508260722.j7Q7Mhd6086583@possum.icir.org> > I am using XORP version 1.1 and Red hat linux release 9. > > I tried to checkout xorp from CVS and I could not.. > > [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ setenv CVSROOT > :pserver:xorpcvs@cvs.xorp.org:/cvs > [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ cvs login > Logging in to :pserver:xorpcvs@cvs.xorp.org:2401/cvs > CVS password: > Unknown host cvs.xorp.org. It looks like there is hostname issue. Can you try: nslookup cvs.xorp.org > [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ > > Which is latest version of XORP in which this BUG is fixed and how can I > get it ? After checking earlier modifications of the relevant code, I realized that I lied to you. The particular fix I had in mind was applied before release 1.1 but probably your problem is related. Please check the following thread from November 2004: Subject: [Xorp-users] user group problem to run xorpsh http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-users/2004-November/thread.html The thread contains info how to track a similar problem. Pavlin From sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com Fri Aug 26 08:57:04 2005 From: sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com (sudheer.kalyanashetty@wipro.com) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:27:04 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode Message-ID: <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF501E65AB2@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> Pavlin, I just deleted the user and created again with group xorp and it started working. Thanks Best regards, Sudheer -----Original Message----- From: Pavlin Radoslavov [mailto:pavlin@icir.org] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 12:53 PM To: Sudheer Kalyanashetty (WT01 - Semiconductors & Consumer Electronics) Cc: pavlin@icir.org; xorp-users@xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] Not able to enter to conf mode > I am using XORP version 1.1 and Red hat linux release 9. > > I tried to checkout xorp from CVS and I could not.. > > [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ setenv CVSROOT > :pserver:xorpcvs@cvs.xorp.org:/cvs > [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ cvs login > Logging in to :pserver:xorpcvs@cvs.xorp.org:2401/cvs > CVS password: > Unknown host cvs.xorp.org. It looks like there is hostname issue. Can you try: nslookup cvs.xorp.org > [sudheer@NPE ~/xorp_new]$ > > Which is latest version of XORP in which this BUG is fixed and how can > I get it ? After checking earlier modifications of the relevant code, I realized that I lied to you. The particular fix I had in mind was applied before release 1.1 but probably your problem is related. Please check the following thread from November 2004: Subject: [Xorp-users] user group problem to run xorpsh http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-users/2004-November/thre ad.html The thread contains info how to track a similar problem. Pavlin Confidentiality Notice The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender at Wipro or Mailadmin@wipro.com immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. From pavlin@icir.org Mon Aug 29 07:15:10 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 23:15:10 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] xorp configuration question In-Reply-To: Message from Alexander Kolesnik of "Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:06:03 +0400." <167581816.20050815230603@kolesnik.spb.ru> Message-ID: <200508290615.j7T6FAv4069030@possum.icir.org> [Apology for the late response; I am still trying to catch-up with old email...] > I'm trying to implement the following configuration: > I've a router with CentOS 4 installed. The bonding is configured and > iptables/cbq/quagga are running. bond1 - is the interface where > clients subnets are terminated on configured subinterfaces (approx. 20 > subinterfaces). Only IPv4 is supported. > I would like to install and run XORP for multicast traffic routing > between clients (bond1) and other network (bond0) (bond0 is not > configured now in XORP, I know; this will be the next step). > Here is my config.boot: > Output of `xorprtr_mgr -v' may be found here: > http://awanti.com/xorp.debug > > The problematic places in that output are delimited with '---'. > So, the questions are: > 1. What 'no interface found' means? What cannot be found and why? The FEA has tried to decode the NETLINK info about an unicast forwarding entry, but that entry didn't contain the next-hop interface index. Eventually, adding some printf() to method NlmUtils::nlm_get_to_fte_cfg() inside fea/netlink_socket_utils.cc aided by the output from the "netstat -rn" or "ip route list" commands may help to discover the problematic entry. > 2. Why 'Target "fea" does not exist or is not enabled' message comes up? The > fea part is actually configured. > 3. 'Target "IGMP" does not exist or is not enabled'. The same > question. You can safely ignore the (2) and (3) messages above. In your case those are transient startup messages that may appear while the particular module is starting. > 4. What 'RX packet from 192.168.25.227 to 239.255.255.250: no vif > found' means? How to configure XORP to understand that traffic? The MFEA has received a multicast packet and that packet is suppose to come from a directly-connected host. However, 192.168.25.227 doesn't belong to any of the configured subnet addresses, hence the MFEA rejects it. If 192.168.25.227 is indeed a directly-connected source, you would have to configure a network interface with a subnet address that covers 192.168.25.227 . Pavlin From erpappola@tin.it Wed Aug 31 14:28:25 2005 From: erpappola@tin.it (mirko) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:28:25 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] (no subject) Message-ID: <007301c5ae2f$dd9f7cc0$657ba8c0@mirko> --=======AVGMAIL-4315B07924AF======= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0070_01C5AE40.A12391D0" ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C5AE40.A12391D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello, when and how i must insert "Xorp group". thanks ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C5AE40.A12391D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello,
when and how i must insert "Xorp=20 group".
thanks
------=_NextPart_000_0070_01C5AE40.A12391D0-- --=======AVGMAIL-4315B07924AF======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 26/08/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-4315B07924AF=======-- From erpappola@tin.it Wed Aug 31 15:26:37 2005 From: erpappola@tin.it (mirko) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:26:37 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] group xorp Message-ID: <001e01c5ae37$ff471510$657ba8c0@mirko> --=======AVGMAIL-4315BE1D3627======= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001B_01C5AE48.C2C3FE30" ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C5AE48.C2C3FE30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello, when and how i must insert "Xorp group". thanks ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C5AE48.C2C3FE30 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 

hello,
when and how i must insert "Xorp=20 group".
thanks
------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C5AE48.C2C3FE30-- --=======AVGMAIL-4315BE1D3627======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 26/08/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-4315BE1D3627=======-- From pavlin@icir.org Wed Aug 31 16:28:31 2005 From: pavlin@icir.org (Pavlin Radoslavov) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:28:31 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] group xorp In-Reply-To: Message from "mirko" of "Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:26:37 +0200." <001e01c5ae37$ff471510$657ba8c0@mirko> Message-ID: <200508311528.j7VFSVHs007585@possum.icir.org> > when and how i must insert "Xorp group". You need to create the UNIX "xorp" group and add yourself (or the username that would be running xorp) as a member of that group before you start XORP (though don't forget to logout and login after the change). How exactly you do this is UNIX-specific question. E.g., on Linux you may want to use programs like "vipw" and "vigr". Pavlin From tdurack@gmail.com Wed Aug 31 18:20:30 2005 From: tdurack@gmail.com (Tim Durack) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] OSPF Message-ID: <9e246b4d050831102053c06d8@mail.gmail.com> ------=_Part_1029_20983060.1125508830790 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Any word on when the new OSPF implementation might be complete enough to=20 start playing with? I just want to use it for a simple testbed, nothing critical, so I'm quite= =20 happy to help debug any problems. Tim:> ------=_Part_1029_20983060.1125508830790 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Any word on when the new OSPF implementation might be complete enough to st= art playing with?

I just want to use it for a simple testbed, nothing critical, so I'm quite = happy to help debug any problems.

Tim:>
------=_Part_1029_20983060.1125508830790--