[Xorp-users] Tiny bit missing

Carsten Otto c-otto@gmx.de
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:12:12 +0100


--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:09:36PM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> XORP supports the following two mechanisms for
> propagating/configuring the RP-Set: the Bootstrap mechanism, and
> Static RPs.
> If the rest of the network is not running the Bootstrap mechanism,
> then you shouldn't use it either, because the main point of using
> it is that all PIM-SM routers will have the same Cand-RP set.
> Even if the rest of your network is using the Bootstrap mechanism,
> in your case it would be safer if you don't configure your XORP
> router as a Candidate-BSR or a Candidate-RP, unless you have good
> reasons for that.

I managed to get it to work by using an old configuration from the
beginnings of this mailing list. I did not use a static RP or bootstrap.
--=20
Carsten Otto
c-otto@gmx.de
www.c-otto.de

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDhGqsjUF4jpCSQBQRAk/tAKCp8PKGjwSlBq2O+/TQWE9B47mxNwCaA6eD
pyw+u8CzRDm/WdApZZMGQEU=
=9ljj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--