[Xorp-users] Question on supporting multiple routing tables [PATCH]

[Ben Greear]

Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
>> Ben Greear wrote:
>>     
>>> This appears to be working..my OSPF instances are now in the 'Full'
>>> state, and it's adding routes.  Unfortunately, it's adding them to the
>>> default routing table, as far as I can tell.  Will debug that next.
>>>       
>> Looks like my problem is that my build machine doesn't have the latest
>> netlink headers, so the resulting Xorp doesn't support large routing
>> tables...
>>     
>
> For testing purpose did you try to use table ID that is smaller than
> 255.
> Such smaller table IDs should work even if you didn't compile with
> the latest netlink headers.
>   
Late last night I got it to compile against the latest headers and it 
started working
fine, even with large tables 10000, 10001,...

Btw, the code should probably do an error message if the router_id is > 
255 but it was
not compiled for RTA_TABLE support...

Thanks,
Ben


> Regards,
> Pavlin
>
>   
>> Ben
>>
>> -- 
>> Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
>> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xorp-users mailing list
>> Xorp-users at xorp.org
>> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>>     


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com