[Xorp-users] New to this multcast - Can this work with xorp?
Daniel Paquet
daniel.paquet at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 11:58:39 PDT 2007
On 10/31/07, Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at icir.org> wrote:
>
> Daniel Paquet <daniel.paquet at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The longest-prefix match for the RP address (10.254.0.1) is
> 10.254.0.0/30, and the next-hop address toward this destination
> appears as 0.0.0.0 (instead of the other side of the tunnel:
> 10.254.0.13).
> This is an artifact of how the route appears inside the Linux kernel
> (and snooped back by the fib2mrib via the FEA).
>
> To get around this problem, you might want to add an explicit
> (better) static route that covers the RP. E.g.:
>
> protocols {
> static {
> mrib-route 10.254.0.0/30 {
> next-hop: 10.254.0.13
> }
> ...
> }
> }
Okay ive added this route, I had the 0.0.0.0 route in as I read the xorp
doc and stated that this is better to use this with tunnels. So now I added
this other mrib-route below the 0.0.0.0 in my config.
So now
show pim mrib :
DestPrefix NextHopRouter VifName VifIndex MetricPref Metric
0.0.0.0/0 10.254.0.13 tun0 1 1 1
10.132.3.0/24 10.132.3.20 eth0 0 0 0
10.254.0.0/30 10.254.0.13 tun0 1 1 1
10.254.0.12/30 10.254.0.14 tun0 1 0 0
and show route table ipv4 multicast final :
0.0.0.0/0 [static(1)/1]
> to 10.254.0.13 via tun0/tun0
10.132.3.0/24 [connected(0)/0]
> via eth0/eth0
10.254.0.0/30 [static(1)/1]
> to 10.254.0.13 via tun0/tun0
10.254.0.12/30 [connected(0)/0]
> via tun0/tun0
After this well, it's kind of the same thing, the linux box join no
multicast group.
--
Ubuntu est un ancien mot africain qui veut dire "Je ne peux pas configurer
Debian"
--
Daniel Paquet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20071031/2735158b/attachment.html
More information about the Xorp-users
mailing list