[Xorp-users] Problem with xorp_rtrmgr

[Victor Faion]

Thanks for the help, Click was still listening on that port and when I
closed it xorp_rtrmgr worked, however it didn't like the syntax I used in
static.boot where I have interfaces/vifs eth0:0 and eth0:1. Is there a
special syntax to specify interface/vif names like these?

Victor

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 22:22, Bruce M. Simpson <bms at incunabulum.net> wrote:

> Victor Faion wrote:
>
>> I downloaded XORP 1.5 and compiled from source on a 64 bit machine, but I
>> am having trouble getting the router manager to start:
>>
>> ./xorp_rtrmgr -b ../static.boot
>> [ 2008/11/27 20:44:19  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:16440 LIBCOMM +312 comm_sock.c
>> comm_sock_bind4 ] Error binding socket (family = 2, my_addr = 127.0.0.1 <
>> http://127.0.0.1/>, my_port = 19999): Address already in use
>> [ 2008/11/27 20:44:19  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:16440 RTRMGR +260 main_rtrmgr.cc
>> run ] Address already in use: a finder may already be running.
>>
>> I am in the xorp group and I'm running this as root. I also ran the tests
>> after installing and it didn't fail any tests. I haven't changed any
>> configuration files, only set some IP addresses in static.boot. Has anyone
>> ever gotten this error?
>>
>>
> The Router Manager wasn't able to open its Finder socket because the
> addresswas already in use.
>
> Do you have any processes listening to port 19999? Use a tool such as
> netstat to verify that this is the case. If you do find a socket bound in
> LISTEN state, use a tool such as lsof to discover exactly which process it
> is.
>
> thanks
> BMS
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20081127/408e3706/attachment.html