[Xorp-users] the static route doesn't appear at first 'xorp_rtrmgr' launch...?
Pavlin Radoslavov
pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
Thu Oct 2 11:00:36 PDT 2008
Hervé Léonard <lherve at interfaceconcept.com> wrote:
>
> Many thanks for your response.
>
> So I compiled the vanilla xorp-1.5 (xorp-1.5.tar.gz form date 2007-07-22)
> but I have another issue:
>
> when I check the compilation by #make check , I have theses 3 FAIL:
> FAIL: test_lemming
> FAIL: test_xrl_router
> FAIL: test_finder_tcp
Do you have any running process (incl. leftover XORP process) that
is using port 19999?
This could explain the failure of the above test programs, and the
failure to start the rtrmgr.
FYI, you can change the default port from 19999 to some other value
by setting the XORP_FINDER_SERVER_PORT environmental variable in your
shell before starting any XORP processes.
Pavlin
> Then, when starting xorp-rtrmgr (with same config.boot file than in first
> mail below), I have theses 2 error lignes :
>
> [ 2008/10/02 18:01:39 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:6975 LIBCOMM +312 comm_sock.c
> comm_sock_bind4 ] Error binding socket (family = 2, my_addr = 127.0.0.1,
> my_port = 19999): Address already in use
> [ 2008/10/02 18:01:39 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:6975 RTRMGR +243 main_rtrmgr.cc
> run ] Address already in use: a finder may already be running.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
> Regards,
>
> Leonard
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
>
> I tried Ubuntu 8.04.1 with 2.6.24-19-server kernel (under VMware)
> and I was able to replicate the problem when I used the Ubuntu
> (Debian?) xorp package:
>
> apt-get install xorp
>
> Running "apt-cache show xorp" reveals the following:
> ...
> Version: 1.5~cvs.20080128-1
> ...
>
> In other words, the xorp package in Ubuntu-8.04.1 seems quite old
> (it is based on CVS snapshot from January 2008 and that code contains
> various FEA-related bugs).
>
> However, when I downloaded the vanilla xorp-1.5.tar.gz source code
> and compiled it, I didn't have this problem.
>
> Hence, you should get the vanilla xorp-1.5 release code from
> xorp.org and compile+install it yourself.
> I believe the next release of Ubuntu will have the updated xorp
> package that is based on the xorp-1.5 release.
>
> Pavlin
>
>
> Hervé Léonard <lherve at interfaceconcept.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I try to configure 2 routers xorp with a config file at launch on a Linux
> > 2.6 (Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron) with this command:
> > sudo /usr/sbin/xorp_rtrmgr -b /etc/xorp/config.boot
> >
> > Here is my testbed configuration:
> >
> > Station1 Router1 Router2
> > Station2
> > eth0 -----------eth0 eth1 -------------- eth1
> eth0 ------------
> > eth0
> > 192.168.2.2 ---- 192.168.2.1 100.0.0.1 ---- 100.0.0.2 192.168.3.1 ----
> > 192.168.3.2
> >
> > On Router2, for example, I have put this in the config.boot (generated by
> > save command):
> >
> > /*XORP Configuration File, v1.0*/
> > protocols {
> > static {
> > disable: false
> > route 192.168.2.0/24 {
> > next-hop: 100.0.0.1
> > metric: 1
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > fea {
> > unicast-forwarding4 {
> > disable: false
> > forwarding-entries {
> > retain-on-startup: false
> > retain-on-shutdown: false
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > interfaces {
> > restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
> > interface eth0 {
> > description: "Ethernet Interface #1"
> > disable: false
> > discard: false
> > unreachable: false
> > management: false
> > vif eth0 {
> > disable: false
> > address 192.168.3.1 {
> > prefix-length: 24
> > broadcast: 192.168.3.255
> > disable: false
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > interface eth1 {
> > description: "Ethernet Interface #2"
> > disable: false
> > discard: false
> > unreachable: false
> > management: false
> > vif eth1 {
> > disable: false
> > address 100.0.0.2 {
> > prefix-length: 8
> > broadcast: 100.255.255.255
> > disable: false
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > The first time, the 2 interfaces are configured but the static route
> doesn't
> > appear. Then I shutdown xorp et restart xorp_rtrmgr. And after that, I can
> > see the static route.
> >
> > Here my shell log:
> >
> > ##
> > ## Start of xorp_rtrmgr the first time
> > ##
> >
> > labo at labo3000:~$ ifconfig
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:21:c9:9d:05
> > inet adr:192.168.3.1 Bcast:192.168.3.255 Masque:255.255.255.0
> > adr inet6: fe80::213:21ff:fec9:9d05/64 Scope:Lien
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > Packets reçus:16 erreurs:0 :0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000
> > Octets reçus:2725 (2.6 KB) Octets transmis:3811 (3.7 KB)
> > Interruption:17
> >
> > eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:f4:cc:f4:c1
> > inet adr:100.0.0.2 Bcast:100.255.255.255 Masque:255.0.0.0
> > adr inet6: fe80::240:f4ff:fecc:f4c1/64 Scope:Lien
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > Packets reçus:0 erreurs:0 :0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000
> > Octets reçus:0 (0.0 B) Octets transmis:3711 (3.6 KB)
> > Interruption:19 Adresse de base:0x4000
> >
> > lo Link encap:Boucle locale
> > inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0.0
> > adr inet6: ::1/128 Scope:Hôte
> > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> > Packets reçus:8510 erreurs:0 :0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:8510 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 lg file transmission:0
> > Octets reçus:838919 (819.2 KB) Octets transmis:838919 (819.2 KB)
> >
> > labo at labo3000:~$ route -n
> > Table de routage IP du noyau
> > Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric Ref Use
> > Iface
> > 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> > 100.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> eth1
> > labo at labo3000:~$
> >
> > #
> > # There is no static route
> > #
> >
> > #
> > # Then, shutdown and restart of xorp_rtrmgr with same config file and here
> > is the result:
> > #
> >
> > labo at labo3000:~$ route -n
> > Table de routage IP du noyau
> > Destination Passerelle Genmask Indic Metric Ref Use
> > Iface
> > 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> > 192.168.2.0 100.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 UG 1 0 0
> eth1
> > 100.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
> eth1
> > labo at labo3000:~$
> >
> > #
> > # This time, the static route appears
> > #
> >
> >
> > I try with a different config.boot file, with the "interfaces"
> configuration
> > node before the "protocols" configuration node, but the result is the
> > same....
> >
> > Do I use correctly the config.boot file?
> > Or is there any solution to have a correct configuration in one shot?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>
> __________ Information NOD32 3488 (20081002) __________
>
> Ce message a ete verifie par NOD32 Antivirus System.
> http://www.nod32.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
More information about the Xorp-users
mailing list