From Dan.Torbet at arrisi.com Thu Apr 2 09:53:20 2009 From: Dan.Torbet at arrisi.com (Torbet, Dan) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:53:20 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] Question about Firewall code Message-ID: <9E2FAA01116B084A9B10EC34D6015A0740196D650B@DENEXMAIL1.ARRS.ARRISI.COM> We are looking at the user documentation and had some questions about the ability of the firewall code to support and Application Level gateway. If there is no support for these - how might one build in this support? Thanks, Dan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090402/2173c6c2/attachment.html From syed.khalid at xorp.net Wed Apr 8 12:27:34 2009 From: syed.khalid at xorp.net (Syed Khalid) Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:27:34 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Question about Firewall code In-Reply-To: <9E2FAA01116B084A9B10EC34D6015A0740196D650B@DENEXMAIL1.ARRS.ARRISI.COM> References: <9E2FAA01116B084A9B10EC34D6015A0740196D650B@DENEXMAIL1.ARRS.ARRISI.COM> Message-ID: Dan What type of ALG features are you looking to support or build? There is some basic documentation for firewall in the release notes and errata doc. Also we recommnd you use the 1.6 code. Syed 2009/4/2 Torbet, Dan > We are looking at the user documentation and had some questions about the > ability of the firewall code to support and Application Level gateway. If > there is no support for these ? how might one build in this support? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090408/f54e14fd/attachment.html From yst.cyan at gmail.com Mon Apr 13 03:04:25 2009 From: yst.cyan at gmail.com (ChuYinsu) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:04:25 +0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Can XORP defined as a daemon? Message-ID: <33466d280904130304wedc4ebap7e703b57757c57ad@mail.gmail.com> Hi, XORP can turn a PC into a router running different routing protocols. However, if XORP is running under Linux, then is it a daemon(like Bird or Quagga) or it's just an application, or a platform for developing/studying/etc. routing protocols? Thanks. From yst.cyan at gmail.com Mon Apr 13 08:44:58 2009 From: yst.cyan at gmail.com (ChuYinsu) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:44:58 +0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Will Quagga/Bird conflict with XORP when both are installed? Message-ID: <33466d280904130844k7fdccee2o4b2bc13dbbfe6b64@mail.gmail.com> Hi, If Bird/Quagga (Internet routing daemons) and XORP are installed together on a computer, will they conflict with each other or just work fine? I noticed that if I have installed Quagga and then try to install Bird, the operating system would require me to uninstall Quagga first. But if I install Bird or Quagga first, then install XORP, there is no such message. I figure this might because that both Bird and Quagga are daemons and probably XORP is not. But I'm still not sure. Any ideas? Thanks! From bms at incunabulum.net Mon Apr 13 15:24:11 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:24:11 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Will Quagga/Bird conflict with XORP when both are installed? In-Reply-To: <33466d280904130844k7fdccee2o4b2bc13dbbfe6b64@mail.gmail.com> References: <33466d280904130844k7fdccee2o4b2bc13dbbfe6b64@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <49E3BB8B.5020908@incunabulum.net> ChuYinsu wrote: > Hi, > > If Bird/Quagga (Internet routing daemons) and XORP are installed > together on a computer, will they conflict with each other or just > work fine? > As long as you run your routing protocols on separate ports/interfaces (and configure everything explicitly to do so), all should be fine. > I noticed that if I have installed Quagga and then try to install > Bird, the operating system would require me to uninstall Quagga first. > But if I install Bird or Quagga first, then install XORP, there is no > such message. > This entirely depends on the distribution / OS you are using. FreeBSD ports for example set CONFLICTS for Quagga and XORP, which is not a XORP issue. > I figure this might because that both Bird and Quagga are daemons and > probably XORP is not. > XORP's Router Manager process, xorp_rtrmgr, has a daemon mode. We don't currently use this in the LiveCD or LiveUSB production builds, however, you can certainly daemonize xorp_rtrmgr by passing the appropriate command line parameter (off the top of my head, I think this is -D, however running xorp_rtrmgr -h should tell you the command line parameters). Note that the protocol processes invoked by xorp_rtrmgr are effectively daemons, in the sense that they are direct child processes of xorp_rtrmgr (assuming you're running on a UNIX host). thanks, BMS From naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in Wed Apr 15 08:35:45 2009 From: naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in (naresh raga 09711348702) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:05:45 +0530 (IST) Subject: [Xorp-users] Can ARM TS-7300 support xorp... Message-ID: <893498.44041.qm@web94815.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Hai, I am working on TS-7300 ARM kit.My aim is to? install xorp on it and implement router functionality.I am using Linux version 2.4.26-ts11 Debian-3.1(sarge).This is the OS? provided with the kit.I have installed libssl (e.g., libssl0.9.7) ????? - libssl-dev ????? - gcc (e.g., gcc-3.3) ????? - g++ (e.g., g++-3.3) the softwares required for building xorp on Debian sarge. When I am trying to configure ,I am getting these errors.. checking build system type ....armv41-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type ....armv41-unknown-linux-gnu checking target system type ....armv41-unknown-linux-gnu checking for a BSD -compatible install ..../usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane....configure:error:newly created file is older than distributed files! Check your system clock... But no makefile is being generated.... please anyone help me... Its my project work... My project got stucked? here because of this error...please help me out from this error. Thanks in advance.. T.Raga naresh Check out the all-new Messenger 9.0! Go to http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090415/442f13cf/attachment.html From william at losrios.edu Wed Apr 15 09:11:55 2009 From: william at losrios.edu (Williams, Mark) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:11:55 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Problem with Xorp passing BSR messages Message-ID: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A3845F33F8CEF@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> I will be deploying Xorp on Linux systems soon to handle multicast routing with PIM-SM. Everything has worked well, but I have had problems with bootstrap router messages. In my testing, I used two Alcatel-Lucent routers and an Xorp system. Each router had two interfaces, and were in a chain in Alcatel - Xorp - Alcatel order. When the Xorp box was configured as the candidate BSR, the Alcatel routers both picked up the Xorp box as the BSR after the election time passed. However, if the Alcatel router on the "left" was configured as the CBSR, there was a strange problem. The Xorp box would learn the correct BSR, and so would the Alcatel router on the "right". However, the boostrap messages to the Alcatel router on the "right" did not get passed frequently enough, and the BSR would expire after 130 seconds. Then about 30 seconds later, the Alcatel on the "right" would pick of the BSR again. It seemed that the BSR had to expire before it would get renewed. The BSR never expired on the Xorp box. I reversed the order and put the BSR on the "right", and got the same results. I could not find any tunable parameters for BSR expiration on the Alcatels or the Xorp system. Any help is appreciated. -Mark Williams From jtc at acorntoolworks.com Wed Apr 15 10:20:20 2009 From: jtc at acorntoolworks.com (J.T. Conklin) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:20:20 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Can ARM TS-7300 support xorp... In-Reply-To: <893498.44041.qm@web94815.mail.in2.yahoo.com> (naresh raga's message of "Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:05:45 +0530 (IST)") References: <893498.44041.qm@web94815.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <87skk9q1ez.fsf@orac.acorntoolworks.com> naresh raga 09711348702 writes: > I am working on TS-7300 ARM kit.My aim is to? install xorp on > it and implement router functionality.I am using Linux version > 2.4.26-ts11 Debian-3.1(sarge).This is the OS? provided with the kit.I > have installed > libssl (e.g., libssl0.9.7) > ????? - libssl-dev > ????? - gcc (e.g., gcc-3.3) > ????? - g++ (e.g., g++-3.3) > the softwares required for building xorp on Debian sarge. > When I am trying to configure ,I am getting these errors.. > > > checking build system type ....armv41-unknown-linux-gnu > checking host system type ....armv41-unknown-linux-gnu > checking target system type ....armv41-unknown-linux-gnu > checking for a BSD -compatible install ..../usr/bin/install -c > checking whether build environment is sane....configure:error:newly created file is older than distributed files! > Check your system clock... > > > But no makefile is being generated.... > please anyone help me... > Its my project work... > My project got stucked? here because of this error...please help me > out from this error. This particular error is caused because the test file compiled has a newer timestamp than the configure script. Is the time on your build machine set correctly? Are you using NFS? If so, the time of the NFS server comes into play as well. A "date; touch foo; ls -l foo" should result in the same timestamp, which should be newer than the configure script. Once you have it building, you may run into hw resource constraints, especially if you have the 32MB or 64MB and not the 128MB version of the TS-7300. Even with 128MB, you may find it difficult. --jtc -- J.T. Conklin From syed.khalid at xorp.net Thu Apr 16 07:32:53 2009 From: syed.khalid at xorp.net (Syed Khalid) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:32:53 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Problem with Xorp passing BSR messages In-Reply-To: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A3845F33F8CEF@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> References: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A3845F33F8CEF@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> Message-ID: Mark Can you open a bug on this? We will try to replicate - with Cisco 7200 - in the Xorp QA lab. Syed On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Williams, Mark wrote: > I will be deploying Xorp on Linux systems soon to handle multicast routing > with PIM-SM. Everything has worked well, but I have had problems with > bootstrap router messages. In my testing, I used two Alcatel-Lucent routers > and an Xorp system. Each router had two interfaces, and were in a chain in > Alcatel - Xorp - Alcatel order. > > When the Xorp box was configured as the candidate BSR, the Alcatel routers > both picked up the Xorp box as the BSR after the election time passed. > > However, if the Alcatel router on the "left" was configured as the CBSR, > there was a strange problem. The Xorp box would learn the correct BSR, and > so would the Alcatel router on the "right". However, the boostrap messages > to the Alcatel router on the "right" did not get passed frequently enough, > and the BSR would expire after 130 seconds. Then about 30 seconds later, the > Alcatel on the "right" would pick of the BSR again. It seemed that the BSR > had to expire before it would get renewed. The BSR never expired on the Xorp > box. > > I reversed the order and put the BSR on the "right", and got the same > results. I could not find any tunable parameters for BSR expiration on the > Alcatels or the Xorp system. > > Any help is appreciated. > > -Mark Williams > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090416/e217fc83/attachment.html From greearb at candelatech.com Mon Apr 20 14:17:54 2009 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:17:54 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Questions on RIP Message-ID: <49ECE682.1030908@candelatech.com> Hello! I'm trying to modify RIP so that it works with virtual routers. So far, I've changed the rip code to have one socket per port. I see these opened in the FEA, and I see the multicast packets being transmitted on the network interfaces. However, I do not ever see any packets received. Are the sockets that send the mcast packets also supposed to be reading the packets from the peer? I assume so, but wanted to check... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From greearb at candelatech.com Mon Apr 20 17:00:21 2009 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:00:21 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Questions on RIP In-Reply-To: <49ECE682.1030908@candelatech.com> References: <49ECE682.1030908@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <49ED0C95.7090200@candelatech.com> Ben Greear wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to modify RIP so that it works with virtual > routers. > > So far, I've changed the rip code to have one socket per port. > > I see these opened in the FEA, and I see the multicast packets > being transmitted on the network interfaces. > > However, I do not ever see any packets received. > > Are the sockets that send the mcast packets also supposed > to be reading the packets from the peer? I assume so, > but wanted to check... > > Thanks, > Ben > Nevermind..I figured it out. I was binding to a specific local IP instead of 0.0.0.0, which does not work for Multicast receive. Fixed by setting reuseaddr and binding to ANY instead. I'll post a patch when I get things cleaned up and a bit more tested. Thanks, ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From greearb at candelatech.com Mon Apr 20 17:23:23 2009 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:23:23 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] Questions on RIP In-Reply-To: <49ED0C95.7090200@candelatech.com> References: <49ECE682.1030908@candelatech.com> <49ED0C95.7090200@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <49ED11FB.4050909@candelatech.com> Ben Greear wrote: > Ben Greear wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I'm trying to modify RIP so that it works with virtual >> routers. >> >> So far, I've changed the rip code to have one socket per port. >> >> I see these opened in the FEA, and I see the multicast packets >> being transmitted on the network interfaces. >> >> However, I do not ever see any packets received. >> >> Are the sockets that send the mcast packets also supposed >> to be reading the packets from the peer? I assume so, >> but wanted to check... >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> > > Nevermind..I figured it out. I was binding to a specific local IP > instead of 0.0.0.0, which does not work for Multicast receive. > > Fixed by setting reuseaddr and binding to ANY instead. > > I'll post a patch when I get things cleaned up and a bit more tested. Here is the cleaned up patch, against 1.6 We'll do more testing in the coming days and I'll post a new patch if I find bugs. Feel free to include this in xorp proper should you wish. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: xorp_rip.patch Url: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090420/6d5de8c4/attachment.ksh From bms at incunabulum.net Mon Apr 20 23:22:07 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:22:07 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Questions on RIP In-Reply-To: <49ED0C95.7090200@candelatech.com> References: <49ECE682.1030908@candelatech.com> <49ED0C95.7090200@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <49ED660F.1030602@incunabulum.net> Ben Greear wrote: > ... > Nevermind..I figured it out. I was binding to a specific local IP > instead of 0.0.0.0, which does not work for Multicast receive. > > Fixed by setting reuseaddr and binding to ANY instead. > Yes, this is fairly typical behaviour. It's an artefact of the laddr / inpcb lookup in 4.4BSD derived TCP/IP stacks. I believe undirected broadcasts will see the same behaviour, although those are only needed for RIPv1 which XORP currently does not implement. cheers, BMS From sportero at cica.es Wed Apr 22 00:05:47 2009 From: sportero at cica.es (Samuel Portero Bolanos) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:05:47 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] RFC 2461 - Neighbor Discovery for IPv6 Message-ID: <49EEC1CB.2080700@cica.es> Hi, i just installed xorp and i try configure to do automatic neighbor discovery for ipv6. i dont know how do it or its posible. i was used zebra and 'ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement' command in another machine and it was work fine. regards -- Samuel F. Portero Bola?os ?rea de Seguridad Inform?tica Centro Inform?tico Cient?fico de Andaluc?a (CICA) Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n - 41012 - Sevilla (Spain) Tfno.: +34 955 056 600 / FAX: +34 955 056 650 Consejer?a de Innovaci?n, Ciencia y Empresa Junta de Andaluc?a -------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje esta firmado digitalmente. Para poder reconocer la firma desde su cliente debera tener instalado el certificado raiz de la F.N.M.T. -------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3362 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090422/4c930878/attachment.bin From bms at incunabulum.net Wed Apr 22 02:36:35 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:36:35 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] RFC 2461 - Neighbor Discovery for IPv6 In-Reply-To: <49EEC1CB.2080700@cica.es> References: <49EEC1CB.2080700@cica.es> Message-ID: <49EEE523.90006@incunabulum.net> Samuel Portero Bolanos wrote: > i just installed xorp and i try configure to do automatic neighbor > discovery for ipv6. i dont know how do it or its posible. > > i was used zebra and 'ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement' command in another > machine and it was work fine. > Anything's possible, it's just about how you do it. I am still spinning up here, so I don't know if this is already on the feature roadmap for XORP 2.0. The XORP architecture is changing, so I'm not up to date with what's involved in implementing all of this. You'd have to step outside of XORP to do this for the time being. For example in FreeBSD (and other KAME based BSDs) there is the 'rtadvd' daemon which takes care of this. I don't know offhand what the equivalent would be in whatever platformyou're using, as you don't mention which platform you are using. It looks like this Zebra option got renamed to plain old 'ipv6 nd prefix ...' although the wording you quote is the Juniper wording. Based on a quick examination of what Quagga does to implement this option, it looks like it does implement it at protocol level. NDP itself is not really a router component as such; it's a function of the host's IPv6 stack. So what we'd be ideally looking for is a code contribution to do this. Speaking Router Advertisements is done in NDP, and that is encapsulated in ICMPv6. The FEA already supports raw IPv6 sockets, so ideally there just needs to be a component which takes router configuration and sets up a bunch of timers to multicast the RA on the local link. It is perhaps an afternoon to a day's work for someone who knows the XORP source tree well, and an educational exercise for someone who wishes to learn. thanks, BMS From sportero at cica.es Wed Apr 22 04:50:51 2009 From: sportero at cica.es (Samuel Portero Bolanos) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:50:51 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] RFC 2461 - Neighbor Discovery for IPv6 In-Reply-To: <49EEE523.90006@incunabulum.net> References: <49EEC1CB.2080700@cica.es> <49EEE523.90006@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: <49EF049B.5000906@cica.es> Hi Bruce, Bruce Simpson escribi?: > Samuel Portero Bolanos wrote: >> i just installed xorp and i try configure to do automatic neighbor >> discovery for ipv6. i dont know how do it or its posible. >> >> i was used zebra and 'ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement' command in another >> machine and it was work fine. >> > > Anything's possible, it's just about how you do it. > > I am still spinning up here, so I don't know if this is already on > the feature roadmap for XORP 2.0. The XORP architecture is changing, so > I'm not up to date with what's involved in implementing all of this. > > You'd have to step outside of XORP to do this for the time being. For > example in FreeBSD (and other KAME based BSDs) there is the 'rtadvd' > daemon which takes care of this. I don't know offhand what the > equivalent would be in whatever platformyou're using, as you don't > mention which platform you are using. I'm using RHEL5 and radvd from redhat repositories, but I want do the ipv6 advertisement using the same routing software. > > It looks like this Zebra option got renamed to plain old 'ipv6 nd > prefix ...' although the wording you quote is the Juniper wording. Based > on a quick examination of what Quagga does to implement this option, it > looks like it does implement it at protocol level. NDP itself is not > really a router component as such; it's a function of the host's IPv6 > stack. > > So what we'd be ideally looking for is a code contribution to do > this. Speaking Router Advertisements is done in NDP, and that is > encapsulated in ICMPv6. The FEA already supports raw IPv6 sockets, so > ideally there just needs to be a component which takes router > configuration and sets up a bunch of timers to multicast the RA on the > local link. It is perhaps an afternoon to a day's work for someone who > knows the XORP source tree well, and an educational exercise for someone > who wishes to learn. Ok, I'll wait ;) > thanks, > BMS thank you vm! -- Samuel F. Portero Bola?os ?rea de Seguridad Inform?tica Centro Inform?tico Cient?fico de Andaluc?a (CICA) Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n - 41012 - Sevilla (Spain) Tfno.: +34 955 056 600 / FAX: +34 955 056 650 Consejer?a de Innovaci?n, Ciencia y Empresa Junta de Andaluc?a -------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje esta firmado digitalmente. Para poder reconocer la firma desde su cliente debera tener instalado el certificado raiz de la F.N.M.T. -------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3362 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090422/abb5e95a/attachment.bin From naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in Wed Apr 22 05:20:51 2009 From: naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in (naresh raga 09711348702) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:50:51 +0530 (IST) Subject: [Xorp-users] Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem Message-ID: <503670.20521.qm@web94813.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Hai xorp-users, I am working on xorp installed on intel machines having ubuntu 8.10.My motherboard had one inbuilt NIC(Network Interface Card).This is my eth0.I have connected one more NIC to PCI of motherboard(eth1).My config.boot is as below: interfaces{ interface eth1 { ??? description: "IT LAB" ??? mac: 00:9d:dd:dd:e0:5c ??? disable: false ??? vif eth1 { ????? disable: false ????? address 10.64.25.77{ ??????? prefix-length: 16 ??????? broadcast: 10.64.255.255 ??????? disable: false ??????? } ??? } ? } interface eth0 { ??? description: "PLC LAN" ??? mac: 00:1c:c0:12:f2:f1???? ??? disable: false ??? vif eth0 { ????? disable: false ????? address 172.16.0.1 { ??????? prefix-length: 24 ??????? broadcast: 172.16.0.255 ??????? disable: false ??????? } ??? } ?} } fea { ? unicast-forwarding4 { ??? disable: false ? } } plumbing { ? mfea4 { ??? disable: false ??? interface eth0 { ????? vif eth0 { ??????? disable: false ??????? } ??? } ?interface eth1 { ????? vif eth1 { ??????? disable: false ??????? } ????? } ??? ??? interface register_vif { ????? vif register_vif { ??????? /* Note: this vif should be always enabled */ ??????? disable: false ??????? } ??? } ??? traceoptions { ????? flag all { ??????? disable: false ??????? } ??? } ? } } protocols { ? static { ??? route 0.0.0.0/0 { ????? next-hop: 10.64.1.1 ????? metric: 1 ????? qualified-next-hop 10.64.25.1 { ??????? metric: 10 ???????? } ????? } ? } } When it is entering mfea4 module,this is the error I am facing: Interface enabled Vif[eth1] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 1 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED [ 2009/04/22 10:46:47? ERROR xorp_fea:10441 MFEA +1180 mfea_node.cc start_vif ] Cannot start vif eth1: underlying vif is not UP and after this it is getting exited.Please help me out. Thanks in advance Naresh Now surf faster and smarter ! Check out the new Firefox 3 - Yahoo! Edition http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/firefox/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090422/98b216e8/attachment-0001.html From bms at incunabulum.net Wed Apr 22 05:50:22 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce M Simpson) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:50:22 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem In-Reply-To: <503670.20521.qm@web94813.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <503670.20521.qm@web94813.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49EF128E.7030806@incunabulum.net> naresh raga 09711348702 wrote: > > ... > Interface enabled Vif[eth1] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 1 Flags: MULTICAST > BROADCAST MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED > [ 2009/04/22 10:46:47 ERROR xorp_fea:10441 MFEA +1180 mfea_node.cc > start_vif ] Cannot start vif eth1: underlying vif is not UP > > and after this it is getting exited.Please help me out. > Usually this message is indicative of a problem with the network interface not being fully configured before XORP is started. Can you please send the output of 'ifconfig eth1' before/after/during XORP running? Thank you. BMS From hhund at astaro.com Wed Apr 22 07:04:46 2009 From: hhund at astaro.com (Heiko Hund) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:04:46 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem In-Reply-To: <503670.20521.qm@web94813.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <503670.20521.qm@web94813.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200904221604.46398.hhund@astaro.com> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 14:20:51 naresh raga 09711348702 wrote: > When it is entering mfea4 module,this is the error I am facing: > > Interface enabled Vif[eth1] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 1 Flags: MULTICAST > BROADCAST MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED [ 2009/04/22 10:46:47? ERROR > xorp_fea:10441 MFEA +1180 mfea_node.cc start_vif ] Cannot start vif eth1: > underlying vif is not UP > > and after this it is getting exited.Please help me out. I had the same error on Linux during startup recently. Happened when the NICs were UP but had no link (RUNNING flag missing). The attached patch fixed it for my use case. Could be that other protocols suffer from the same thing as well. Haven't checked as I only need PIM-SM and IGMP. Would very much like too see this in upstream, so please feel free to commit. Regards, Heiko -- Heiko Hund | Software Engineer | Phone +49-721-25516-237 | Fax -200 Astaro AG | Amalienbadstra?e 36 / Bau 33a | 76227 Karlsruhe | Germany Executive Board: Markus Hennig, Jan Hichert, Ludwig Lutter Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Stanley J. Krasnow Headquarter Location: Karlsruhe Commercial Register: Mannheim HRB 108997 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ignore_link_state_during_startup.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1630 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090422/2d84582c/attachment.bin From bms at incunabulum.net Wed Apr 22 09:10:46 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:10:46 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem In-Reply-To: <214337.58960.qm@web94808.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <214337.58960.qm@web94808.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49EF4186.5050706@incunabulum.net> naresh raga 09711348702 wrote: > BEFORE: > Thanks. That looks normal, although what I was really looking for was the carrier / link status; I forgot this isn't provided by Linux ifconfig output, and mii-tool is needed instead (it must be run as root, via su or sudo) :- # mii-tool eth1 eth1: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok Is a cable connected to this interface when you start XORP? Are you able to apply and test the patch which Heiko provided? That looks like it should solve the problem -- I have encountered this MFEA issue before and I believe there is a Bugzilla entry for it already: http://bugzilla.xorp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560 thanks, BMS From murad03_khan at yahoo.com Wed Apr 22 09:42:21 2009 From: murad03_khan at yahoo.com (Murad) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Xorp-users] need help regarding DHCP Relay Message-ID: <449384.91532.qm@web52408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Hi, Can anyone tell me how can i configure Xorp router interface for DHCP relay so that client computers can be assigned IPs from DHCP server on other subnet of the router. Thanks in advance! Murad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090422/0a89f5e2/attachment.html From bms at incunabulum.net Wed Apr 22 11:04:21 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:04:21 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] need help regarding DHCP Relay In-Reply-To: <449384.91532.qm@web52408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <449384.91532.qm@web52408.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49EF5C25.8030009@incunabulum.net> Murad wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me how can i configure Xorp router interface for DHCP > relay so that client computers can be assigned IPs from DHCP server on > other subnet of the router. > XORP doesn't supply any DHCP relay support of its own, nor does it provide any means of configuring it, you will need to add this via other means. thanks, BMS From naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in Wed Apr 22 11:48:43 2009 From: naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in (naresh raga 09711348702) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:18:43 +0530 (IST) Subject: [Xorp-users] Fw: Re: Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem Message-ID: <323245.4674.qm@web94813.mail.in2.yahoo.com> --- On Thu, 23/4/09, naresh raga 09711348702 wrote: From: naresh raga 09711348702 Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem To: "Bruce Simpson" Date: Thursday, 23 April, 2009, 12:15 AM ?$ sudo mii-tool eth1 SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth1' failed: Operation not supported This is the result for my eth1.What does this mean??I have properly connected a cable to my eth1. Can you forward the link where I can get the Heiko patch?. I have followed and commented the code? as written in the http://bugzilla.xorp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560 But even then I am facing the same problem..underlying VIF is not UP.. Where does the problem lie??Is it with my card(eth1)? Thanks in advance Naresh --- On Wed, 22/4/09, Bruce Simpson wrote: From: Bruce Simpson Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] Underlying VIF is not UP..please solve this problem To: "naresh raga 09711348702" Cc: "xorp" Date: Wednesday, 22 April, 2009, 9:40 PM naresh raga 09711348702 wrote: > BEFORE: > Thanks. That looks normal, although what I was really looking for was the carrier / link status; I forgot this isn't provided by Linux ifconfig output, and mii-tool is needed instead (it must be run as root, via su or sudo) :- # mii-tool eth1 eth1: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok Is a cable connected to this interface when you start XORP? Are you able to apply and test the patch which Heiko provided? That looks like it should solve the problem -- I have encountered this MFEA issue before and I believe there is a Bugzilla entry for it already: ???http://bugzilla.xorp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560 thanks, BMS Now surf faster and smarter ! Check out the new Firefox 3 - Yahoo! Edition * Click here! Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more! Go to http://in.movies.yahoo.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090423/567f0375/attachment.html From naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in Wed Apr 22 13:00:47 2009 From: naresh_raga at yahoo.co.in (naresh raga 09711348702) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:30:47 +0530 (IST) Subject: [Xorp-users] How to use the patch of Heiko Message-ID: <208892.80118.qm@web94815.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Mr.Heiko, Can you please help me how to use the patch you have provided for solving the problem..underlying VIF is not UP.. Thanks in advance.. Naresh Now surf faster and smarter ! Check out the new Firefox 3 - Yahoo! Edition http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/firefox/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090423/3511438e/attachment.html From shardasaiwan at gmail.com Thu Apr 23 03:59:29 2009 From: shardasaiwan at gmail.com (sharda saiwan) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] how FEA interacts with underlying forwarding plane? Message-ID: How FEA interacts with the underlying forwarding plane (e.g. 'Click')? Is there any docs for that? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090423/e45eca0a/attachment.html From bms at incunabulum.net Thu Apr 23 05:50:17 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:50:17 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] how FEA interacts with underlying forwarding plane? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <49F06409.9080007@incunabulum.net> [resend from usual account for list archives to pick up] sharda saiwan wrote: > > > How FEA interacts with the underlying forwarding plane (e.g. 'Click')? > Is there any docs for that? please see: http://www.xorp.org/releases/1.6/docs/fea/fea.pdf You may wish to look under docs/ in the source tree for specific discussion of the interaction with Click, of course the final normative reference is the source code. thanks, BMS From shardasaiwan at gmail.com Thu Apr 23 21:40:48 2009 From: shardasaiwan at gmail.com (sharda saiwan) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] Fwd: how FEA interacts with underlying forwarding plane? In-Reply-To: References: <49F05A30.7000301@icir.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: > sharda saiwan wrote: > >> >> >> How FEA interacts with the underlying forwarding plane (e.g. 'Click')? >> Is there any docs for that? >> > > please see: > http://www.xorp.org/releases/1.6/docs/fea/fea.pdf > > You may wish to look under docs/ in the source tree for specific discussion > of the interaction with Click, of course the final normative reference is > the source code. > > thanks, > BMS > > Hi Bruce, thanks for the response. but this document shows the interaction of FEA with other routing processes (like rtrmgr etc.). how FEA interacts with the forwarding plane is still not very clear. i want to run FEA and the forwarding plane on different machines (as per my understanding its not possible in the current version), what changes need to be done in FEA?? thanks & regards, sharda saiwan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090424/5f0627bc/attachment.html From bms at incunabulum.net Fri Apr 24 02:32:57 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:32:57 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Fwd: how FEA interacts with underlying forwarding plane? In-Reply-To: References: <49F05A30.7000301@icir.org> Message-ID: <49F18749.2050209@incunabulum.net> sharda saiwan wrote: > > i want to run FEA and the forwarding plane on different machines (as > per my understanding its not possible in the current version), what > changes need to be done in FEA?? That's not possible; the FEA process is the one responsible for communicating with the forwarding plane -- decoupling the FEA and forwarding plane makes no sense in the XORP model, as the FEA's role is to encapsulate the forwarding plane in a way which the other XORP processes can communicate with. I can't speak for the specifics of Click, though, I am under the impression it also has to run on the same node. thanks, BMS From bms at incunabulum.net Mon Apr 27 09:24:22 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:22 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] How to use the patch of Heiko In-Reply-To: <208892.80118.qm@web94815.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <208892.80118.qm@web94815.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <49F5DC36.3080000@incunabulum.net> Hello, I've forwarded you Heiko Hund's patch for the MFEA off-list in case you don't already have it. naresh raga 09711348702 wrote: > Mr.Heiko, > Can you please help me how to use the patch you have provided for > solving the problem..underlying VIF is not UP.. > I would imagine that the patch would need to be applied via the usual means -- I have not tested it myself -- and I believe the patch is against the 1.6 release sources. Typically one would download the attachment to a text file, e.g. call it patch.txt, and apply as follows: cd xorp patch -p0 -i /path/to/your/patch.txt Note that the '-p' argument to patch(1) determines the number of forward slashes in each individual diff section's file or pathname which will be skipped when determining which files each diff section is to be applied to. This is the most common cause of failure to apply a source patch in unified or combined diff format. You might want to refer to the man page for patch(1) in case you get stuck. Please Cc: further correspondence to the list, as I cannot respond personally. thanks, BMS From bms at incunabulum.net Tue Apr 28 01:59:52 2009 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:59:52 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Fwd: how FEA interacts with underlying forwarding plane? In-Reply-To: References: <49F05A30.7000301@icir.org> <49F18749.2050209@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: <49F6C588.9000202@incunabulum.net> sharda saiwan wrote: > > Actually I am talking about the separation of control plane and data > plane. According to the separation concept (the ForCES framework), to > control and configure the data plane, the control plane should consist > of an image of the underlying data plane (which includes attributes, > capabilities and state information). > > In this separated control and data plane framework, if we use XORP as > a routing daemon, then FEA is the process that contains all these > information. So, I think FEA should be placed in control plane and the > forwarding/data plane will run on a different system. > > Please suggest how XORP can be used in the above scenario. The point is that whilst the FEA is conceptually part of the control plane, it is coupled to the forwarding plane in terms of implementation. You can't have the FEA separate from the forwarding plane, it needs to run on the node which is doing the forwarding, because it encapsulates the forwarding plane specifics and what is needed to control it. I highly encourage you to read the source code, in order to understand why these design decisions were made, and also because it will give you more of a background (other than theroetical) about exactly what the FEA is, what it does, and why. thanks, BMS From shardasaiwan at gmail.com Mon Apr 27 22:39:39 2009 From: shardasaiwan at gmail.com (sharda saiwan) Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] Fwd: how FEA interacts with underlying forwarding plane? In-Reply-To: <49F18749.2050209@incunabulum.net> References: <49F05A30.7000301@icir.org> <49F18749.2050209@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: > sharda saiwan wrote: > >> >> i want to run FEA and the forwarding plane on different machines (as per >> my understanding its not possible in the current version), what changes need >> to be done in FEA?? >> > > That's not possible; the FEA process is the one responsible for > communicating with the forwarding plane -- decoupling the FEA and forwarding > plane makes no sense in the XORP model, as the FEA's role is to encapsulate > the forwarding plane in a way which the other XORP processes can communicate > with. > > I can't speak for the specifics of Click, though, I am under the impression > it also has to run on the same node. > > thanks, > BMS > Hi Bruce, Actually I am talking about the separation of control plane and data plane. According to the separation concept (the ForCES framework), to control and configure the data plane, the control plane should consist of an image of the underlying data plane (which includes attributes, capabilities and state information). In this separated control and data plane framework, if we use XORP as a routing daemon, then FEA is the process that contains all these information. So, I think FEA should be placed in control plane and the forwarding/data plane will run on a different system. Please suggest how XORP can be used in the above scenario. Thanks & regards, Sharda Saiwan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090428/38c945e0/attachment.html From bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in Tue Apr 28 22:48:56 2009 From: bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in (bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:18:56 +0530 (IST) Subject: [Xorp-users] OSPF4 neighbor shown in only one machine not on the other two Message-ID: <7fafac67bc7482e3827f3a7171fc1bf8.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in> Hello Friends, I have tried to configure ospf4 in xorp. I have configured 3 machines for this purpose. When i use the command show ospf4 neighbor on one machine(fedora 8) out of three then it shows neighbor correclty but when i use the same command on other two machines (suse 10.3) then it does not show neighbors on the those machines. Following is my configuration files on fedora and suse machines: (1) configuration file for fedora machine interfaces { interface eth0 { description: "Ethernet Interface" disable: false vif eth0 { disable: false address 10.10.10.60 { prefix-length: 24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } vif vlan1{ vlan{ vlan-id:1 } address 10.10.10.70{ prefix-length:24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { disable: false } } protocols { ospf4 { router-id: 10.10.10.60 area 0.0.0.0 { interface eth0 { vif eth0{ address 10.10.10.60 { } } } } } } (2)configuration file on suse machine1: interfaces { interface eth4 { description: "Ethernet Interface" disable: false vif eth4 { disable: false address 10.10.10.80 { prefix-length: 24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } vif vlan1{ vlan{ vlan-id:1 } address 10.10.10.90{ prefix-length:24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { disable: false } } protocols { ospf4 { router-id: 10.10.10.80 area 0.0.0.0 { interface eth4 { vif eth4{ address 10.10.10.80 { } } } } } } (3)configuration file for susemachine 2: interfaces { interface eth5 { description: "Ethernet Interface" disable: false vif eth5 { disable: false address 10.10.10.110 { prefix-length: 24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } vif vlan1{ vlan{ vlan-id:1 } address 10.10.10.120{ prefix-length:24 broadcast: 10.10.10.255 disable: false } } } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { disable: false } } protocols { ospf4 { router-id: 10.10.10.10 area 0.0.0.0 { interface eth5 { vif eth5{ address 10.10.10.110 { } } } } } } Can anyone please tell me what is the problem? Thanks in advance for help. Regards, Bhavin, Comm Student From syed.khalid at xorp.net Wed Apr 29 08:58:25 2009 From: syed.khalid at xorp.net (Syed Khalid) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:58:25 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] OSPF4 neighbor shown in only one machine not on the other two In-Reply-To: <7fafac67bc7482e3827f3a7171fc1bf8.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in> References: <7fafac67bc7482e3827f3a7171fc1bf8.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in> Message-ID: Hello Bhavin Can you open a bug on this and we will replicate in the lab? Syed On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:48 PM, wrote: > Hello Friends, > > I have tried to configure ospf4 in xorp. I have configured > 3 machines for this purpose. When i use the command show ospf4 > neighbor on one machine(fedora 8) out of three then it shows neighbor > correclty but when i use the same command on other two machines (suse > 10.3) then it does not show neighbors on the those machines. > Following is my configuration files on fedora and suse machines: > (1) configuration file for fedora machine > interfaces { > interface eth0 { > description: "Ethernet Interface" > disable: false > > vif eth0 { > disable: false > address 10.10.10.60 { > prefix-length: 24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > vif vlan1{ > vlan{ > vlan-id:1 > } > address 10.10.10.70{ > prefix-length:24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > > } > } > > fea { > unicast-forwarding4 { > disable: false > } > } > > protocols { > ospf4 { > router-id: 10.10.10.60 > area 0.0.0.0 { > interface eth0 { > vif eth0{ > address 10.10.10.60 { > } > } > } > } > } > } > (2)configuration file on suse machine1: > interfaces { > interface eth4 { > description: "Ethernet Interface" > disable: false > > vif eth4 { > disable: false > address 10.10.10.80 { > prefix-length: 24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > vif vlan1{ > vlan{ > vlan-id:1 > } > address 10.10.10.90{ > prefix-length:24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > > } > } > > fea { > unicast-forwarding4 { > disable: false > } > } > > protocols { > ospf4 { > router-id: 10.10.10.80 > area 0.0.0.0 { > interface eth4 { > vif eth4{ > address 10.10.10.80 { > } > } > } > } > } > } > > (3)configuration file for susemachine 2: > interfaces { > interface eth5 { > description: "Ethernet Interface" > disable: false > > vif eth5 { > disable: false > address 10.10.10.110 { > prefix-length: 24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > vif vlan1{ > vlan{ > vlan-id:1 > } > address 10.10.10.120{ > prefix-length:24 > broadcast: 10.10.10.255 > disable: false > } > } > > } > } > > fea { > unicast-forwarding4 { > disable: false > } > } > > protocols { > ospf4 { > router-id: 10.10.10.10 > area 0.0.0.0 { > interface eth5 { > vif eth5{ > address 10.10.10.110 { > } > } > } > } > } > } > > Can anyone please tell me what is the problem? > Thanks in advance for help. > > Regards, > Bhavin, > Comm Student > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090429/6b70c053/attachment.html From chuyram28 at msn.com Wed Apr 29 10:23:59 2009 From: chuyram28 at msn.com (JESUS RAMIREZ) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:23:59 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] Help ! Message-ID: Hello eveybody ... Good Morning, I'm rookie in this ,but I think it's very interesting and I want to learn, so I have a lot a questions for you. If I want to configure 2 network cards ( Ethernet ) were can i found the configuration ? I read the manual and i dont konw how can i get into the code? or do i need to download from your web and then paste it, because i need to configure de rip too....if i need to download any file were can i found ? and how can i paste it ? I don't know if any of you guys can Help me..... please : ( Thank you. Chuy. _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live? Hotmail?:?more than just e-mail. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_more_042009 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090429/2ffb8c9d/attachment.html From segv at o2.pl Thu Apr 30 01:13:28 2009 From: segv at o2.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Tomek?=) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:13:28 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] =?utf-8?q?virtual_link?= Message-ID: <7d5b33e3.e29f54.49f95da8.93a59@o2.pl> Hi, I've got a problem with xorp configuration. Actually in my case situation looks like this: R3 <-> R5 <-> R4 <-> R6 where: R3 is an ABR of area 0 (left side) and area 1 (right side) R5 is internal of area 1 R4 is ABR of area 1(left side) and area 3 (right side) R6 internal of area 3 everything works fine until i want to configure virtual link between R3 and R4 I added virtual-link section to area 0.0.0.0 in ospf4 section area 0.0.0.0 { virtual-link 192.168.0.40 { transit-area: 0.0.0.1 } .... and tried to add virtual-link to R4 without succeed because of error: Command failed Virtual link must be in area 0.0.0.0 my question is how to configure virtual link at R4 ? R3 reports something like this root at r3> show ospf4 neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead 192.168.6.50 eth3/eth3 Full 192.168.0.50 128 33 192.168.5.40 vlink/192.168.0.40 Init 192.168.0.40 0 0 .... Please help, It is very important for me! Thank you Best regards, Tom From nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net Thu Apr 30 12:01:32 2009 From: nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net (Nithya Chandrakesan) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:01:32 -0700 Subject: [Xorp-users] virtual link In-Reply-To: <7d5b33e3.e29f54.49f95da8.93a59@o2.pl> References: <7d5b33e3.e29f54.49f95da8.93a59@o2.pl> Message-ID: <1dfe63a80904301201n73c25767m653fe0f90ddc5935@mail.gmail.com> Hi Tom, Could you provide us your config? Also let us know which version of XORP you were trying. Thanks, Nithya. On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Tomek wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a problem with xorp configuration. > Actually in my case situation looks like this: > > R3 <-> R5 <-> R4 <-> R6 > > where: > > R3 is an ABR of area 0 (left side) and area 1 (right side) > R5 is internal of area 1 > R4 is ABR of area 1(left side) and area 3 (right side) > R6 internal of area 3 > > everything works fine until i want to configure virtual link between R3 and > R4 > I added virtual-link section to area 0.0.0.0 in ospf4 section > > area 0.0.0.0 { > virtual-link 192.168.0.40 { > transit-area: 0.0.0.1 > } > .... > and tried to add virtual-link to R4 without succeed because of error: > Command failed Virtual link must be in area 0.0.0.0 > > my question is how to configure virtual link at R4 ? > > R3 reports something like this > > root at r3> show ospf4 neighbor > Address Interface State ID Pri Dead > 192.168.6.50 eth3/eth3 Full 192.168.0.50 128 > 33 > 192.168.5.40 vlink/192.168.0.40 Init 192.168.0.40 0 > 0 > .... > > Please help, It is very important for me! > Thank you > > Best regards, > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090430/54bde79e/attachment.html From irving.lp at feestudiantes.cujae.edu.cu Thu Apr 30 18:45:28 2009 From: irving.lp at feestudiantes.cujae.edu.cu (Irving Leonard) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] not getting an alias Message-ID: <200904302145.28680.irving.lp@feestudiantes.cujae.edu.cu> I am so newbe in xorp but I read (breafly) the manual and it says that every vif can take a lot of addresses but for me it doesn't make an alias. I have a vif and give it 2 addresses in the same subnet, because I need to have 2 IPs but it only get's the first. I'm using ubuntu hardy 8.04.2 regards irving VI Conferencia Internacional de Energ?a Renovable, Ahorro de Energ?a y Educaci?n Energ?tica 9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones ...Por una cultura energ?tica sustentable www.ciercuba.com