From carsten at c-otto.de  Sun Mar  1 01:28:26 2009
From: carsten at c-otto.de (Carsten Otto)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:28:26 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539
	mfea_node.cc	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index !=
	Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
Message-ID: <20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>

Hi again,

Sorry Pavlin, your answer got lost, as my mailserver had a problem. So i
am replying here.

It does not help to delete the information for eth0.2, as I already
wrote in the first mail:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:57:19PM +0100, Carsten Otto wrote:
> I attached the config file. Removing the sections for eth2 and eth0.2 at the
> top does not resolve the problem.

Any idea?

Thanks,
-- 
Carsten Otto
carsten at c-otto.de
www.c-otto.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090301/dc6fdc25/attachment.bin 

From carsten at c-otto.de  Sun Mar  1 01:33:01 2009
From: carsten at c-otto.de (Carsten Otto)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:33:01 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] cand-rp without BSR
In-Reply-To: <20090218181948.GE25985@carsten-otto>
References: <20090218181948.GE25985@carsten-otto>
Message-ID: <20090301093301.GC20594@carsten-otto>

Thanks for the answers!
I think we just forgot to configure the cisco router that sits in
between...

Thanks,
-- 
Carsten Otto
carsten at c-otto.de
www.c-otto.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090301/3088eab4/attachment.bin 

From bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in  Mon Mar  2 02:50:01 2009
From: bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in (bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in)
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:20:01 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] help: getting the error no finder?
In-Reply-To: <1c56f7b10903011954h78c13bdah625972737b60b32a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.15.1235678419.13529.xorp-users@xorp.org>
	<026537793ff8e6e43e0ddac9a83686a1.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
	<1c56f7b10902282223h32a037eav6ea87fc4db35334d@mail.gmail.com>
	<1349eb262d6d5c9d18ffd39d1a2946fb.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
	<1c56f7b10903011954h78c13bdah625972737b60b32a@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d5a401c77d80a348a966110a4be1503b.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>

Hello Ram & friends,

     Thanks for the reply. Now i have got another problem.
When i am running the ./xorp_rtrmgr then i am getting following
errors:
(a)group xorp does not exits
(b)xorp_rtrmgr is shutting down due to init error.
failed to open config.boot

     As i have said that i have not created any config file.
Does that mean the error(b) is due to that reason. If yes then
someone can please send me some config file so that at least i can
begin. Can you please tell me how to create xrop group.

     Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bhavin

> Hi Bhavin,  yesterday i didn't give u clear one. try this one.
> 1. open a terminal, go to the xorp folder.
> 2. then cd rtrmgr.
> 3.  ./xorp_rtrmgr.( it will enable fea,rib....etc.)
> 4. open other terminal and run  ./xorpsh. it welcomes u to xorp  CLI
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:11 AM, <bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in> wrote:
>
>> Hello Ram,
>>
>>   Thanks for the reply.
>> I have got one problem. I am not finding the folder where i
>> have to execute rtrmgr. Can you please tell me the absolute path
>> of that one.
>>
>> > Hi Bhavin,
>> > did u run rtrmgr ? i think u did not.
>> >
>> > Run "./rtrmgr"( in rtr manager) and open other terminal go to the
>> rtrmgr
>> > directory and run "./xorpsh"
>> >
>> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:02 AM, <bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hell friends,
>> >>
>> >>        I am new to xorp. I have compiled xorp-1.6 on freebsd 7.1.
>> >> I wrote command  ./xropsh (in rtrmanager directory) and got the
>> >> following
>> >> error messagees:
>> >> (A) Error XORPSH:44998 RTRMGR +96 xorpsh_main.cc wait_for
>> >> xrl_router_ready
>> >> Xrlrouter failes.
>> >> No Finder?
>> >> (B) Error XORPSH:44998 RTRMGR +906 xorpsh_main.cc
>> >> xorpsh exiting due to an init error:
>> >> failed to connect to router manager.
>> >>
>> >>      I have not done anyother configuration in config file up to now.
>> >> Please help.
>> >>
>> >>      Thanks in advance for providing help.
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >> Bhavin.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Xorp-users mailing list
>> >> Xorp-users at xorp.org
>> >> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ramkumar Cherukuri
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ramkumar Cherukuri
>



From rahulk.patel at einfochips.com  Mon Mar  2 03:16:32 2009
From: rahulk.patel at einfochips.com (Rahul K Patel)
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:46:32 +0530
Subject: [Xorp-users] help: getting the error no finder?
In-Reply-To: <d5a401c77d80a348a966110a4be1503b.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
References: <mailman.15.1235678419.13529.xorp-users@xorp.org>	<026537793ff8e6e43e0ddac9a83686a1.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>	<1c56f7b10902282223h32a037eav6ea87fc4db35334d@mail.gmail.com>	<1349eb262d6d5c9d18ffd39d1a2946fb.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>	<1c56f7b10903011954h78c13bdah625972737b60b32a@mail.gmail.com>
	<d5a401c77d80a348a966110a4be1503b.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
Message-ID: <49ABC010.9080702@einfochips.com>

Hi Bhavin,

a) To add xorp group on rhel machine use following command
     #groupadd xorp
b) Attached herewith is sample config file to configure interface eth0 
in default mode.
    use config file with -b option
    ./xorp_rtrmgr -b config.xorp.interface

Note: you need to modify config file in order to configure different 
routing protocol.
see xorp manual for more detail on xorp commands.

Thanks,
Rahul Patel,
Embedded Engineer,
eInfochips Ltd,
Ahmedabad.


bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in wrote:
> Hello Ram & friends,
>
>      Thanks for the reply. Now i have got another problem.
> When i am running the ./xorp_rtrmgr then i am getting following
> errors:
> (a)group xorp does not exits
> (b)xorp_rtrmgr is shutting down due to init error.
> failed to open config.boot
>
>      As i have said that i have not created any config file.
> Does that mean the error(b) is due to that reason. If yes then
> someone can please send me some config file so that at least i can
> begin. Can you please tell me how to create xrop group.
>
>      Thanks in advance.
> Regards,
> Bhavin
>
>   
>> Hi Bhavin,  yesterday i didn't give u clear one. try this one.
>> 1. open a terminal, go to the xorp folder.
>> 2. then cd rtrmgr.
>> 3.  ./xorp_rtrmgr.( it will enable fea,rib....etc.)
>> 4. open other terminal and run  ./xorpsh. it welcomes u to xorp  CLI
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:11 AM, <bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Hello Ram,
>>>
>>>   Thanks for the reply.
>>> I have got one problem. I am not finding the folder where i
>>> have to execute rtrmgr. Can you please tell me the absolute path
>>> of that one.
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi Bhavin,
>>>> did u run rtrmgr ? i think u did not.
>>>>
>>>> Run "./rtrmgr"( in rtr manager) and open other terminal go to the
>>>>         
>>> rtrmgr
>>>       
>>>> directory and run "./xorpsh"
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:02 AM, <bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Hell friends,
>>>>>
>>>>>        I am new to xorp. I have compiled xorp-1.6 on freebsd 7.1.
>>>>> I wrote command  ./xropsh (in rtrmanager directory) and got the
>>>>> following
>>>>> error messagees:
>>>>> (A) Error XORPSH:44998 RTRMGR +96 xorpsh_main.cc wait_for
>>>>> xrl_router_ready
>>>>> Xrlrouter failes.
>>>>> No Finder?
>>>>> (B) Error XORPSH:44998 RTRMGR +906 xorpsh_main.cc
>>>>> xorpsh exiting due to an init error:
>>>>> failed to connect to router manager.
>>>>>
>>>>>      I have not done anyother configuration in config file up to now.
>>>>> Please help.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Thanks in advance for providing help.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Bhavin.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Xorp-users mailing list
>>>>> Xorp-users at xorp.org
>>>>> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ramkumar Cherukuri
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> Ramkumar Cherukuri
>>
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>
>
> Email Scanned for Virus & Dangerous Content by : www.CleanMailGateway.com
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090302/4718942e/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: config.xorp.interface
Url: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090302/4718942e/attachment.ksh 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Mon Mar  2 10:54:13 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:54:13 -0800
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539 mfea_node.cc
	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index != Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto> 
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
Message-ID: <200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: mfea.patch
Url: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090302/4e43507e/attachment.ksh 

From carsten at c-otto.de  Mon Mar  2 11:20:30 2009
From: carsten at c-otto.de (Carsten Otto)
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:20:30 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539
	mfea_node.cc	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index !=
	Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <20090302192030.GE30942@carsten-otto>

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:54:13AM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> Do you get the fatal error if you remove the 10.10.0.1 address so
> the eth0.2 entry disappears from the "ifconfig -a" output?

I will not try if there is another way to solve the problem. That
address is more important than multicast functionality.

> In addition, please try of the following patch. Note that it is
> against the code in the CVS repository so it might not apply cleanly
> for the 1.6 code.

Will do.

> Also, please note that I haven't tested that patch so I have
> low expectations whether it will actually fix the issue.

Well, at least you know the code :)

Thanks,
-- 
Carsten Otto
carsten at c-otto.de
www.c-otto.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090302/65d60049/attachment.bin 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Mon Mar  2 11:35:49 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:35:49 -0800
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539 mfea_node.cc
	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index != Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <20090302192030.GE30942@carsten-otto> 
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090302192030.GE30942@carsten-otto>
Message-ID: <200903021935.n22JZn8i019996@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Carsten Otto <carsten at c-otto.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:54:13AM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> > Do you get the fatal error if you remove the 10.10.0.1 address so
> > the eth0.2 entry disappears from the "ifconfig -a" output?
> 
> I will not try if there is another way to solve the problem. That
> address is more important than multicast functionality.

My question re. the removal of the 10.10.0.1 address was from the
perspective of narrowing the issue.

Regards,
Pavlin

> > In addition, please try of the following patch. Note that it is
> > against the code in the CVS repository so it might not apply cleanly
> > for the 1.6 code.
> 
> Will do.
> 
> > Also, please note that I haven't tested that patch so I have
> > low expectations whether it will actually fix the issue.
> 
> Well, at least you know the code :)
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Carsten Otto
> carsten at c-otto.de
> www.c-otto.de
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


From carsten at c-otto.de  Tue Mar  3 05:24:24 2009
From: carsten at c-otto.de (Carsten Otto)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:24:24 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539
	mfea_node.cc	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index !=
	Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <20090302192030.GE30942@carsten-otto>
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090302192030.GE30942@carsten-otto>
Message-ID: <20090303132424.GD10543@daedalus.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:54:13AM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:                                                                                                                                                                                                        
> In addition, please try of the following patch. Note that it is                                                                                                                                                                                                         
> against the code in the CVS repository so it might not apply cleanly                                                                                                                                                                                                    
> for the 1.6 code.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
> Also, please note that I haven't tested that patch so I have                                                                                                                                                                                                            
> low expectations whether it will actually fix the issue.                                                                                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                   
Loading (m)fea works. Now I run into the following error:              
                                                                                    
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:25742 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: rib (rib/xorp_rib)
/usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib: error: `/usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib' does not exist
This script is just a wrapper for xorp_rib.                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
See the libtool documentation for more information.                             
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:08  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:25742 RTRMGR +754 module_manager.cc done_cb ] Command "/usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib": exited with exit status 1.                                                                                                                 
                                                 
(log attached)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
Please also note the various error messages regarding eth0.2 (which do not                                                                                                                                                                                                
seem to be critical).                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
Thanks, 
-- 
Carsten Otto
carsten at c-otto.de
www.c-otto.de
-------------- next part --------------
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:23  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +249 master_conf_tree.cc execute ] Changed modules: interfaces, firewall, fea, mfea4, rib, fib2mrib, igmp, pimsm4
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:23  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: interfaces (fea/xorp_fea)
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:24 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] MFEA enabled
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:24 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI enabled
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:24 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI started
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:24 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] MFEA enabled
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:24 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI enabled
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:24 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] CLI started
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:25  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: firewall (fea/xorp_fea)
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:29  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: fea (fea/xorp_fea)
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: mfea4 (fea/xorp_fea)
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  ERROR xorp_fea:28562 MFEA +1196 ../libproto/proto_node.hh set_config_pif_index ] Cannot set pif_index for vif eth0.2: no such vif
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  ERROR xorp_fea:28562 MFEA +1229 ../libproto/proto_node.hh set_config_vif_flags ] Cannot set flags for vif eth0.2: no such vif
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  ERROR xorp_fea:28562 MFEA +1124 ../libproto/proto_node.hh add_config_vif_addr ] Cannot add address to vif eth0.2: no such vif
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  ERROR xorp_fea:28562 MFEA +697 mfea_node.cc vifaddr4_update ] Cannot add address 10.10.0.1 to vif eth0.2 from the set of configured vifs: Cannot add address to vif eth0.2: no such vif
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface added: Vif[eth0] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 0 addr: 137.226.111.20 subnet: 137.226.108.0/22 broadcast: 137.226.111.255 peer: 0.0.0.0 addr: 137.226.111.254 subnet: 137.226.108.0/22 broadcast: 0.0.0.0 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface added: Vif[eth1] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 1 addr: 137.226.119.114 subnet: 137.226.119.112/29 broadcast: 137.226.119.119 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface added: Vif[eth2] pif_index: 3 vif_index: 2 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST MTU: 1500
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] MFEA started
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface enabled Vif[eth0] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 0 addr: 137.226.111.20 subnet: 137.226.108.0/22 broadcast: 137.226.111.255 peer: 0.0.0.0 addr: 137.226.111.254 subnet: 137.226.108.0/22 broadcast: 0.0.0.0 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface started: Vif[eth0] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 0 addr: 137.226.111.20 subnet: 137.226.108.0/22 broadcast: 137.226.111.255 peer: 0.0.0.0 addr: 137.226.111.254 subnet: 137.226.108.0/22 broadcast: 0.0.0.0 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 UP IPv4 ENABLED
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface added: Vif[register_vif] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 3 addr: 137.226.111.20 subnet: 137.226.111.20/32 broadcast: 137.226.111.20 peer: 0.0.0.0 addr: 137.226.111.254 subnet: 137.226.111.254/32 broadcast: 137.226.111.254 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: PIM_REGISTER UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface enabled Vif[eth1] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 1 addr: 137.226.119.114 subnet: 137.226.119.112/29 broadcast: 137.226.119.119 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface started: Vif[eth1] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 1 addr: 137.226.119.114 subnet: 137.226.119.112/29 broadcast: 137.226.119.119 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 UP IPv4 ENABLED
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface enabled Vif[register_vif] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 3 addr: 137.226.111.20 subnet: 137.226.111.20/32 broadcast: 137.226.111.20 peer: 0.0.0.0 addr: 137.226.111.254 subnet: 137.226.111.254/32 broadcast: 137.226.111.254 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: PIM_REGISTER UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35 INFO xorp_fea MFEA ] Interface started: Vif[register_vif] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 3 addr: 137.226.111.20 subnet: 137.226.111.20/32 broadcast: 137.226.111.20 peer: 0.0.0.0 addr: 137.226.111.254 subnet: 137.226.111.254/32 broadcast: 137.226.111.254 peer: 0.0.0.0 Flags: PIM_REGISTER UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 UP IPv4 ENABLED
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: rib (rib/xorp_rib)
/usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib: error: `/usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib' does not exist
This script is just a wrapper for xorp_rib.
See the libtool documentation for more information.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +754 module_manager.cc done_cb ] Command "/usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib": exited with exit status 1.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:35  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +323 module_manager.cc module_exited ] Module abnormal exit: rib
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:37  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:38  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:39  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:40  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:41  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:42  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:43  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:44  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:45  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:46  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:47  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:48  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:49  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:50  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:51  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:52  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:53  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:54  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:55  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:56  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:57  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:58  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:20:59  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:00  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:01  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:02  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:03  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:04  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:05  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:06  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28543 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "rib" does not exist or is not enabled.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +2003 task.cc task_fail ] Shutting down fatally wounded process (rib)
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +691 master_conf_tree.cc commit_pass2_done ] Commit failed: Can't validate config ready of process rib
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +261 master_conf_tree.cc config_done ] Configuration failed: Can't validate config ready of process rib
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +2233 task.cc run_task ] No more tasks to run
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +176 module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: fea
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +176 module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: firewall
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +176 module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: interfaces
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +176 module_manager.cc terminate ] Terminating module: mfea4
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +199 module_manager.cc terminate ] Killing module: mfea4
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:08  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +754 module_manager.cc done_cb ] Command "/usr/local/xorp/fea/xorp_fea": terminated with signal 15.
[ 2009/03/03 14:21:08  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28543 RTRMGR +287 module_manager.cc module_exited ] Module killed during shutdown: mfea4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090303/741dbdbe/attachment.bin 

From isaacnskb at gmail.com  Tue Mar  3 04:07:51 2009
From: isaacnskb at gmail.com (Isaac)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 04:07:51 -0800
Subject: [Xorp-users] Dynamic Tunnels/Callbacks
Message-ID: <9312bbe60903030407l7f04b063v343d34451c066ca4@mail.gmail.com>

Hello everyone,

I am currently in the process of evaluating XORP for our custom solution.
We tried XORP back in 2005 (even before OSPF was implemented) for multicast
routing and it worked great.  Now, I need to evaluate it again and see if it
will be a good fit for this project.  Before I do that, I want to see if
someone has ran into a similar network topology or has done something
similar and see if I can get some pointers.

The attached image shows my current setup.  The following describes the
elements:

* static[1-3] - Dumb routers that have static routes (including multicast,
they just forward packets and dont care about membership) and they cannot be
dynamically changed.
* xorp[1-3] - These are the only items that can be tweaked.
* windows[1-3] - Regular computers that always have to be connected
transparently
* modem[1-2] - Modems used to connect to dialin server
* dialing - Dialin server running ppp that can also run XORP

An element group consists of a windows, xorp, and static elements and each
group is on a separate subnet.

Currently there are two requirements

1) static1 usually dies (part of the experiment).  When that happens xorp2
and xorp1 need to dial a server and communicate and exchange routes Windows
2 can talk to Windows 1.
2) Element groups should be able to join dynamically

Currently I am thinking of creating tunnels dynamically between all XORP
machines (n * xorp machines on each box) with a custom multicast protocol
and running something like OSPF on the tunnels.  This will allow me treat
each XORP router as a next hop neighbor.  Once OSPF detects a link is down,
I could setup a callback for dialing and exchange routers between xorp1 and
xorp2 over the dialin server.  My questions are:

1) Can routing be done in this setup without dynamic tunnels
2) Can callbacks be setup on XORP so that when a router is down a script can
be ran.
3) Other potential solutions.

Thanks in advanced for any help.

--
Isaac
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090303/0ce09096/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xorp.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 37912 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090303/0ce09096/attachment-0001.jpg 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Tue Mar  3 10:27:38 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:27:38 -0800
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539 mfea_node.cc
	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index != Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <20090303132222.GC10543@daedalus.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> 
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090303132222.GC10543@daedalus.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-ID: <200903031827.n23IRcOD013439@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Carsten Otto <otto at informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:54:13AM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> > In addition, please try of the following patch. Note that it is
> > against the code in the CVS repository so it might not apply cleanly
> > for the 1.6 code.
> > Also, please note that I haven't tested that patch so I have
> > low expectations whether it will actually fix the issue.
> 
> Loading (m)fea works. Now I run into the following error:
> 
> [ 2009/03/03 14:20:07  INFO xorp_rtrmgr:25742 RTRMGR +101 module_manager.cc execute ] Executing module: rib (rib/xorp_rib)
> /usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib: error: `/usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib' does not exist
> This script is just a wrapper for xorp_rib.
> See the libtool documentation for more information.
> [ 2009/03/03 14:20:08  ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:25742 RTRMGR +754 module_manager.cc done_cb ] Command "/usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib": exited with exit status 1.
> 
> (log attached)
> 
> Please also note the various error messages regarding eth0.2 (which do not
> seem to be critical).

Please try the patch with the XORP-1.6 code (the patch should apply
cleanly), because the code in the CVS repository is in flux.

Regards,
Pavlin


From tom.gibson at ipvidnet.com  Tue Mar  3 11:09:35 2009
From: tom.gibson at ipvidnet.com (Tom Gibson)
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:09:35 -0800
Subject: [Xorp-users] Xorp + Kernel Click on Linux -- Does this work for
 anyone in recent code?
In-Reply-To: <200902262352.n1QNqN2f011365@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <49A4FF16.5000807@ipvidnet.com>
	<200902262352.n1QNqN2f011365@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <49AD806F.6060901@ipvidnet.com>

Hi Pavlin,

That's unfortunate.  I'll gather some more details and then look at 
submitting a Bugzilla entry.  I may try debugging the code and seeing if 
I can get a patch possibly.

I was looking before at possibly using an old Xorp and Click version.  
It's a pain having to go back to such an old Kernel version though (to 
support the Kernel Click patches).

I'll post another reply when I have an update.

Thanks,

Tom

Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Unfortunately, the Click testing and support has fallen behind the
> rest of the system. It has been a while since we tested them
> together, and most likely it was with an older version of Click
> (1.4.x).
>
> We are planning to add-back the Click support in the future.
> In the mean time you can try XORP-1.6 with some of the older
> Click versions (maybe Click-1.4.3?), though I don't know whether
> this will actually work. If this doesn't work, you might want to try
> some of the older XORP releases that should work with Click.
> I believe I have used XORP-1.4 with Click-1.4.1.
>
> If other folks have more recent experience please speak up.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavlin
>
> P.S. Could you submit a Bugzilla entry with the issue, and include
> your XORP config file, so we can use that entry to track the
> problem.
>
>
> Tom Gibson <tom.gibson at ipvidnet.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Should the latest Xorp work fine with Kernel Click on Linux?  It seems 
>> to be broke from what I can tell.
>>
>> Right now using the latest Click all I can get working is the user mode 
>> version.  Kernel mode just causes Xorp startup to go bad with all kinds 
>> of timeout messages.  The MFEA and RIB modules seem to hang and not 
>> respond.  With a minimal config that doesn't enable any protocols or the 
>> MFEA / RIB modules it gets a little further but right after saying "no 
>> more tasks to do" I start getting these type of errors:
>>
>>     
>>> [ 2009/02/24 23:50:35 WARNING xorp_fea LIBXORP ] 10 seconds between calls to EventLoop::run
>>> [ 2009/02/24 23:50:35  ERROR xorp_fea:10743 XRL +720 xrl_pf_stcp.cc die ] XrlPFSTCPSender died: Keepalive timeout
>>>       
>> I remember using another version of Click I managed to get it to load 
>> with a minimal config (no protocols enabled).  Tomorrow I'll test this 
>> again and get some more info on which version this was with.
>>
>> I'm new to both Xorp and Click code bases as well as Linux programming 
>> and tools like cvs.  Can anyone offer guidance on getting this working?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xorp-users mailing list
>> Xorp-users at xorp.org
>> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>>     


From carsten at c-otto.de  Wed Mar  4 11:33:29 2009
From: carsten at c-otto.de (Carsten Otto)
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:33:29 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539
	mfea_node.cc	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index !=
	Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <200903031827.n23IRcOD013439@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090303132222.GC10543@daedalus.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
	<200903031827.n23IRcOD013439@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <20090304193329.GD26763@carsten-otto>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:27:38AM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> Please try the patch with the XORP-1.6 code (the patch should apply
> cleanly), because the code in the CVS repository is in flux.

Okay, that worked. It triggered some bug in IGMP code, though. I now
transferred the VLAN to a physical LAN and XORP starts and works fine.
It would be nice to have VLAN support, though.

Thanks for your help,
-- 
Carsten Otto
carsten at c-otto.de
www.c-otto.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090304/d6403dbc/attachment.bin 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Wed Mar  4 13:33:49 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:33:49 -0800
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539 mfea_node.cc
	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index != Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <20090304193329.GD26763@carsten-otto> 
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090303132222.GC10543@daedalus.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
	<200903031827.n23IRcOD013439@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090304193329.GD26763@carsten-otto>
Message-ID: <200903042133.n24LXnKx025358@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Carsten Otto <carsten at c-otto.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:27:38AM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> > Please try the patch with the XORP-1.6 code (the patch should apply
> > cleanly), because the code in the CVS repository is in flux.
> 
> Okay, that worked. It triggered some bug in IGMP code, though. I now

Please submit a Bugzilla entry about the issue.

> transferred the VLAN to a physical LAN and XORP starts and works fine.
> It would be nice to have VLAN support, though.

Down the road it should.

Thanks,
Pavlin


From carsten at c-otto.de  Wed Mar  4 13:54:10 2009
From: carsten at c-otto.de (Carsten Otto)
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:54:10 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] FATAL xorp_fea:27902 MFEA +539
	mfea_node.cc	vif_update ] Assertion (vif_index !=
	Vif::VIF_INDEX_INVALID) failed
In-Reply-To: <200903042133.n24LXnKx025358@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <20090220225718.GH5984@carsten-otto>
	<20090301092825.GB20594@carsten-otto>
	<200903021854.n22IsDhx015048@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090303132222.GC10543@daedalus.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
	<200903031827.n23IRcOD013439@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<20090304193329.GD26763@carsten-otto>
	<200903042133.n24LXnKx025358@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <20090304215410.GF26763@carsten-otto>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:33:49PM -0800, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote:
> Please submit a Bugzilla entry about the issue.

Sorry, I don't have the output. It only happens with your inofficial
path, though (without the patch it crashes in mfea code, as already
explained).

> Down the road it should.

Good :)

Thanks,
-- 
Carsten Otto
carsten at c-otto.de
www.c-otto.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090304/bda089a1/attachment.bin 

From rays at maine.edu  Thu Mar  5 10:12:45 2009
From: rays at maine.edu (Soucy, Ray)
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:12:45 -0500
Subject: [Xorp-users] RIPng on XORP 1.6 to Cisco 7600
Message-ID: <36243D984F88BA4ABD1E0EFC1E61B989652B53@fudd.ad.maine.edu>

Trying to get RIPng working on a test box and talking to a Cisco 7600.

Did a trace on RIPng and see the following:

[ <time> TRACE xorp_ripng RIP ] Packet on
7f000101-00018437-00021263-04c30000 from interface eth1 vif eth1 <router
link local address> 564 bytes
[ <time> TRACE xorp_ripng RIP ] Discarding packet <router link local
address> 564 bytes


Configuration:

        ripng {
            traceoptions {
                flag {
                    all {
                    }
                }
            }
            interface eth1 {
                vif eth1 {
                    address 2610:48:400::A {
                        advertise-default-route: false
                    }
                }
            }
            export: "RIPng-connected"
        }

        policy-statement "RIPng-connected" {
            term export {
                from {
                    protocol: "connected"
                    network6: 2610:48:400:2::/64
                }
            }
        }

        network6-list "v6-networks" {
            network 2610:48:400:2::/64
        }

        interface eth0 {
            description: "LAN"
            vif eth0 {
                address 169.244.x.1 {
                    prefix-length: 28
                    broadcast: 169.244.x.15
                }
                address 2610:48:400:2::1 {
                    prefix-length: 64
                }
            }
        }
        interface eth1 {
            description: "WAN"
            vif eth1 {
                address 169.244.x.66 {
                    prefix-length: 30
                }
                address 2610:48:400::A {
                    prefix-length: 126
                }
            }
        }

Any ideas?

Ray Soucy
Communications Specialist

+1 (207) 561-3526

Communications and Network Services

University of Maine System
http://www.maine.edu/




From bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in  Fri Mar  6 21:10:02 2009
From: bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in (bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in)
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:40:02 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] getting the error:You do not have permission for this
	operation
Message-ID: <d6b938d9163a6d1f8cb6a6fe0e2d65d7.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>

Hello friend,


        When i execute configure command after executing xorpsh command
in rtrmgr directory i am getting following error:

You do not have permission for this operation.

Regards,
Bhavin


From rahulk.patel at einfochips.com  Fri Mar  6 21:53:12 2009
From: rahulk.patel at einfochips.com (Rahul K Patel)
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:23:12 +0530
Subject: [Xorp-users] getting the error:You do not have permission for
 this	operation
In-Reply-To: <d6b938d9163a6d1f8cb6a6fe0e2d65d7.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
References: <d6b938d9163a6d1f8cb6a6fe0e2d65d7.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
Message-ID: <49B20BC8.7040709@einfochips.com>

It seems you are not running xorpsh from xorp group.
So first create xorp group and add your user in it than run rtrmgr and 
xorpsh from that user only.

Thanks,
Rahul Patel,
Embedded Engineer,
eInfochips Ltd,
Ahmedabad.

bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in wrote:
> Hello friend,
>
>
>         When i execute configure command after executing xorpsh command
> in rtrmgr directory i am getting following error:
>
> You do not have permission for this operation.
>
> Regards,
> Bhavin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>
>
> Email Scanned for Virus & Dangerous Content by : www.CleanMailGateway.com
>
>
>   

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it
are intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain legally
privileged and confidential information. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of
this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to this message and please delete it from your computer. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender
unless otherwise stated.Company has taken enough precautions to prevent
the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
__________________________________________________________________________
 


From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Sun Mar 15 00:16:26 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:16:26 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] RIPng on XORP 1.6 to Cisco 7600
In-Reply-To: <36243D984F88BA4ABD1E0EFC1E61B989652B53@fudd.ad.maine.edu> 
References: <36243D984F88BA4ABD1E0EFC1E61B989652B53@fudd.ad.maine.edu>
Message-ID: <200903150716.n2F7GQav014081@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Soucy, Ray <rays at maine.edu> wrote:

> Trying to get RIPng working on a test box and talking to a Cisco 7600.
> 
> Did a trace on RIPng and see the following:
> 
> [ <time> TRACE xorp_ripng RIP ] Packet on
> 7f000101-00018437-00021263-04c30000 from interface eth1 vif eth1 <router
> link local address> 564 bytes
> [ <time> TRACE xorp_ripng RIP ] Discarding packet <router link local
> address> 564 bytes

I am not sure this will solve the problem, but you might try to
explictly add the link-local address to the corresponding
ripng/interface/vif and interfaces/interface/vif blocks.

Pavlin

> 
> Configuration:
> 
>         ripng {
>             traceoptions {
>                 flag {
>                     all {
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
>             interface eth1 {
>                 vif eth1 {
>                     address 2610:48:400::A {
>                         advertise-default-route: false
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
>             export: "RIPng-connected"
>         }
> 
>         policy-statement "RIPng-connected" {
>             term export {
>                 from {
>                     protocol: "connected"
>                     network6: 2610:48:400:2::/64
>                 }
>             }
>         }
> 
>         network6-list "v6-networks" {
>             network 2610:48:400:2::/64
>         }
> 
>         interface eth0 {
>             description: "LAN"
>             vif eth0 {
>                 address 169.244.x.1 {
>                     prefix-length: 28
>                     broadcast: 169.244.x.15
>                 }
>                 address 2610:48:400:2::1 {
>                     prefix-length: 64
>                 }
>             }
>         }
>         interface eth1 {
>             description: "WAN"
>             vif eth1 {
>                 address 169.244.x.66 {
>                     prefix-length: 30
>                 }
>                 address 2610:48:400::A {
>                     prefix-length: 126
>                 }
>             }
>         }
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Ray Soucy
> Communications Specialist
> 
> +1 (207) 561-3526
> 
> Communications and Network Services
> 
> University of Maine System
> http://www.maine.edu/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 17 09:25:00 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:55:00 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
Message-ID: <533726.52182.qm@web94902.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

Hello friends,

I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.

I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.

I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.

When? i make it i get the following error.

/bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
 fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1


Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work .

If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?

Your help will be highly appreciated in this.

regards
Kanth 
________________________________
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. 


      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090317/23da6117/attachment.html 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Tue Mar 17 10:10:25 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:10:25 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <533726.52182.qm@web94902.mail.in2.yahoo.com> 
References: <533726.52182.qm@web94902.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200903171710.n2HHAPa9004646@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello friends,
> 
> I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.

Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
in tandem with PIM-SM.

Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?

Regards,
Pavlin

> I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> 
> I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> 
> When? i make it i get the following error.
> 
> /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
>  fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> 
> 
> Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work .
> 
> If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> 
> Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> 
> regards
> Kanth 
> ________________________________
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. 
> 
> 
>       Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


From berto at ccuec.unicamp.br  Tue Mar 17 10:55:50 2009
From: berto at ccuec.unicamp.br (Alexandre Berto Nogueira)
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:55:50 -0300
Subject: [Xorp-users] Redistributing connected into OSPF
Message-ID: <49BFE426.1070709@ccuec.unicamp.br>

Hello All

I'm using a XORP 1.6 like as ASBR and I want to redistribute his
connected routes into a OSPF NSSA area. However the another  router is
running quagga 0.99 and not show the routes's XORP. Both are running
FreeBSD 7.1.

Here is my config:

protocols {
   ospf4 {
      router-id: 10.0.1.2
      area 0.0.0.1 {
            area-type: "nssa"
            interface de0 {
                link-type: "broadcast"
                vif de0 {
                   address 10.0.1.2 {
                   }
               }
            }
        }
        export connected
     }
}
interfaces {
   interface de0 {
     vif de0 {
       address 10.0.1.2 {
          prefix-lenght: 27
      }
    }
  }
  interface fxp1 {
     vif fxp1 {
        address 10.0.82.1 {
           prefix-lenght: 24
        }
      }
    }
}
policy {
  policy-statement connected {
     term 1 {
        from {
           protocol: "connected"
       }
       then {
          accept {
          }
      }
    }
  }
}

Thanks a lot!!

Berto


-- 
Alexandre Berto Nogueira e-mail: berto at ccuec.unicamp.br
Fone: (19) 3521-2212 FAX: (19) 3521-2251
SREDE - CCUEC - UNICAMP


From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 17 20:03:01 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:33:01 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <200903171710.n2HHAPa9004646@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <533726.52182.qm@web94902.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903171710.n2HHAPa9004646@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <143657.5262.qm@web94910.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

Thanks pavlin,

Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .


It gave me the expected result .

My testing environment is like below

Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)

When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.

In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .

In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC.

As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.

My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!

My basic obstacles till now is 



?



________________________________
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello friends,
> 
> I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.

Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
in tandem with PIM-SM.

Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?

Regards,
Pavlin

> I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> 
> I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> 
> When? i make it i get the following error.
> 
> /bin/sh ../.../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
>? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper..lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> 
> 
> Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work .
> 
> If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> 
> Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> 
> regards
> Kanth 
> ________________________________
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. 
> 
> 
>? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman..ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users



      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090318/a9fd5a23/attachment.html 

From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 17 20:07:50 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:37:50 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
Message-ID: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

Thanks pavlin,


Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .

My testing environment is like below

Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)

When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.

In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .

In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result .

As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.

My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!

My basic obstacles till now is 


1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?

2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?

3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?

Please put in your thoughts .

Thanks & Regards
Kanth

________________________________
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello friends,
> 
> I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.

Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
in tandem with PIM-SM.

Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?

Regards,
Pavlin

> I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> 
> I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> 
> When? i make it i get the following error.
> 
> /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
>? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> 
> 
> Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work .
> 
> If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> 
> Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> 
> regards
> Kanth 
> ________________________________
> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> 
> 
>? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users

________________________________
Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.


      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090318/6a9c6911/attachment.html 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Fri Mar 20 10:40:48 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:40:48 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com> 
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Kanth,

Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
(i.e., IGMP only is not enough).

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks pavlin,
> 
> 
> Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> 
> My testing environment is like below
> 
> Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> 
> When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> 
> In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> 
> In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result .
> 
> As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> 
> My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> 
> My basic obstacles till now is 
> 
> 
> 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?

The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
try:
 * Start with a clean source and build tree

 * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
   could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.

 * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
   properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
   can be cross-compiled).

 * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure

 * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).

> 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?

For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim.

Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
of XORP).

> 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?

igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
must run pim.

Regards,
Pavlin

> Please put in your thoughts .
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Kanth
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello friends,
> > 
> > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> 
> Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> in tandem with PIM-SM.
> 
> Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > 
> > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > 
> > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > 
> > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > 
> > 
> > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work .
> > 
> > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > 
> > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > 
> > regards
> > Kanth 
> > ________________________________
> > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> > 
> > 
> >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> 
> ________________________________
> Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
> 
> 
>       Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


From aleksandar.cvjetic at gmail.com  Fri Mar 20 16:16:28 2009
From: aleksandar.cvjetic at gmail.com (Aleksandar Cvjetic)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:16:28 -0400
Subject: [Xorp-users] Getting kdoc
Message-ID: <249ccfe90903201616n1c39df28qf4ab85717941f4ca@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Is it enough to type "cvs -d :pserver:xorp.....etc " to get kdoc? Linux told
me "bash: cvs: command not found"

Thanks,
Alex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090320/ee9ee3c5/attachment.html 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Fri Mar 20 18:10:59 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:10:59 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] Getting kdoc
In-Reply-To: <249ccfe90903201616n1c39df28qf4ab85717941f4ca@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <249ccfe90903201616n1c39df28qf4ab85717941f4ca@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200903210110.n2L1AxUe017619@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Aleksandar Cvjetic <aleksandar.cvjetic at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Is it enough to type "cvs -d :pserver:xorp.....etc " to get kdoc? Linux told
> me "bash: cvs: command not found"

You need to install the "cvs" package for your distro.

Pavlin

> Thanks,
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Sat Mar 21 00:17:21 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:47:21 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

Thanks a lot pavlin,

Your comments are indeed very help full for me.

I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .

1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld

2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 

3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"

4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.

With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.

Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?

To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?

How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?

Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 

Please send your comments

regards
Kanth

________________________________
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips

Kanth,

Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
(i.e., IGMP only is not enough).

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks pavlin,
> 
> 
> Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> 
> My testing environment is like below
> 
> Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> 
> When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> 
> In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> 
> In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result .
> 
> As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> 
> My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> 
> My basic obstacles till now is 
> 
> 
> 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?

The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
try:
* Start with a clean source and build tree

* Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.

* Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
? properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
? can be cross-compiled).

* Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure

* Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).

> 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?

For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim.

Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
of XORP).

> 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?

igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
must run pim.

Regards,
Pavlin

> Please put in your thoughts .
> 
> Thanks & Regards
> Kanth
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello friends,
> > 
> > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> 
> Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> in tandem with PIM-SM.
> 
> Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > 
> > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > 
> > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > 
> > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > 
> > 
> > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > 
> > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > 
> > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > 
> > regards
> > Kanth 
> > ________________________________
> > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> > 
> > 
> >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> 
> ________________________________
> Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
> 
> 
>? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users



      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090321/f930918b/attachment.html 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Sat Mar 21 13:28:05 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:28:05 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com> 
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot pavlin,
> 
> Your comments are indeed very help full for me.
> 
> I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .
> 
> 1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld
> 
> 2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 
> 
> 3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"
> 
> 4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.
> 
> With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.
> 
> Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?

Typically there is few seconds latency when a receiver leaves a
multicast group, because of the way IGMP works.

> To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?

Please see rtrmgr/config/multicast4.boot for a sample configuration
file for multicast routing. Also, see the XORP User Manual for
detail description of the configuration statements.

> How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?

I presume you mean "maximum" instead of "minimum".
I believe for Linux the default max. value is 20 groups (per
interface?).
See the MLD/IGMP and PIM-SM sections in the xorp/ERRATA file for
hints if you need to increase that number.

> Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 

Currently the only control is by specifying the group prefix per
static-rp or for the bootstrap mechanism.
Please add a feature request to Bugzilla for per-interface address
range control.

Regards,
Pavlin

> Please send your comments
> 
> regards
> Kanth
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> Kanth,
> 
> Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
> you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
> (i.e., IGMP only is not enough).
> 
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks pavlin,
> > 
> > 
> > Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> > 
> > My testing environment is like below
> > 
> > Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> > 
> > When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> > 
> > In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> > 
> > In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result .
> > 
> > As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> > 
> > My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> > 
> > My basic obstacles till now is 
> > 
> > 
> > 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?
> 
> The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
> doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
> try:
> * Start with a clean source and build tree
> 
> * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
> ? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.
> 
> * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
> ? properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
> ? can be cross-compiled).
> 
> * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure
> 
> * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).
> 
> > 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?
> 
> For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
> fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim.
> 
> Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
> as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
> of XORP).
> 
> > 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?
> 
> igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
> must run pim.
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> > Please put in your thoughts .
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Kanth
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > 
> > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello friends,
> > > 
> > > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> > 
> > Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> > The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> > in tandem with PIM-SM.
> > 
> > Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> > using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pavlin
> > 
> > > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > > 
> > > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > > 
> > > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > > 
> > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> > >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2.lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > > 
> > > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > > 
> > > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Kanth 
> > > ________________________________
> > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > > Xorp-users mailing list
> > > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
> > 
> > 
> >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> 
> 
> 
>       Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


From azeem_k at hotmail.com  Mon Mar 23 09:34:38 2009
From: azeem_k at hotmail.com (Azeem Khan)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:34:38 +0000
Subject: [Xorp-users] distributed click support
Message-ID: <COL103-W48DDF364C342FBDB16863A8D920@phx.gbl>


Hello,

 

  I am interested in using XORP to control the data planes on a set of PCs. i.e. multiple PCs act as a single logical router. The PCs will use Click as the data plane on Linux. The forwarding tables created by XORP will be identical for each PC at first but that may not be true at later stages of my research.

 

  Are these possible? The user manual does not seem to tell in a direct way how.

 

Thank You.

 

 

Azeem Khan


_________________________________________________________________
Twice the fun?Share photos while you chat with Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090323/fe1eb4a9/attachment.html 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Tue Mar 24 10:26:23 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:26:23 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <796858.20385.qm@web94909.mail.in2.yahoo.com> 
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<796858.20385.qm@web94909.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200903241726.n2OHQNVb000755@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Kanth,

Currently XORP doesn't have the mechanism to control the range of
the multicast addresses you need.
This is a valid request that XORP should have such mechanism, hence
please submit a Bugzilla entry so we can track it.

In the mean time you would have to use iptables to apply the
filtering you need.

BTW, in your config you should have interface/vif entry for
"register_vif" in both the mfea4 and pimsm4 sections.

Regards,
Pavlin

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi Pavlin,
> 
> I could able to increase the number of multicast seesions by following the ERRATA document.
> 
> Still iam looking for the following configuration.
> 
> to control only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> 
> I followed your comments but still not with much sucess.
> 
> Let me explaing my testing environment and my requirement.
> 
> Windows PC ==> WAN =eth0==> Xorp Router(Fedora 8?Machine) =eth1==> LAN ==> Windows PC
> 
> Fedora Machine has two N IC cards 
> 
> 1. eth0 with public ip Wan interface 
> 2. eth1 with lan interface.
> 
> Now what iam trying to do is.
> 
> 1) i want to limit my xorp router to allow only 239.1.1.0/26 i.e 239.1.1.0 to 239.1.1.127 multicast range IGMP , remaining should be discarded .
> 
> This is both in case of server and host i.e 
> 
> 1) if my lan pc is working as receiver it should only get the stream if the range is within the above specified one.
> 2) if my lan pc is source at that time also if it is with in the above range then only it?should be?allowed to muliticast.
> 
> I think i can use iptables in implementing a firewall in order to discard the packates out side of this range, but this solution would be outside of the xorp.
> 
> Iam trying this behavior from the xrop.
> 
> thanks and regards
> kanth
> 
> Iam pasting my config.boot here .
> 
> protocols {
> /*????? fib2mrib {
> ???????????????? disable: false
> ???????????????? }*/
> ??????? igmp {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ????????????????? }
> ????????????????? interface br0 {
> ????????????????????????? vif br0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ????????????????? }
> ??????? }
> ??????? pimsm4 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> ??????????????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> ??????????????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? interface br0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> ??????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> ??????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> ??????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????????????? static-rps {
> ??????????????????????? rp *.*.*.38 {?? /* this my fedora wan ip */
> ??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 239.1.1.0/26 {
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? }
> }
> fea {
> ??????? unicast-forwarding4 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????? }
> }
> interfaces {
> ??????? restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
> ??????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? discard: false
> ??????????????? description: ""
> ??????????????? default-system-config {
> ??????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? interface br0 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? discard: false
> ??????????????? description: ""
> ??????????????? default-system-config {
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? }
> }
> plumbing {
> ??????? mfea4 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????????????? interface? br0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? }
> }
> 
> 
> ?
> ?
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks a lot pavlin,
> > 
> > Your comments are indeed very help full for me.
> > 
> > I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .
> > 
> > 1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld
> > 
> > 2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 
> > 
> > 3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"
> > 
> > 4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.
> > 
> > With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.
> > 
> > Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?
> 
> Typically there is few seconds latency when a receiver leaves a
> multicast group, because of the way IGMP works.
> 
> > To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?
> 
> Please see rtrmgr/config/multicast4.boot for a sample configuration
> file for multicast routing. Also, see the XORP User Manual for
> detail description of the configuration statements.
> 
> > How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?
> 
> I presume you mean "maximum" instead of "minimum".
> I believe for Linux the default max. value is 20 groups (per
> interface?).
> See the MLD/IGMP and PIM-SM sections in the xorp/ERRATA file for
> hints if you need to increase that number.
> 
> > Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> 
> Currently the only control is by specifying the group prefix per
> static-rp or for the bootstrap mechanism.
> Please add a feature request to Bugzilla for per-interface address
> range control.
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> > Please send your comments
> > 
> > regards
> > Kanth
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> > Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > 
> > Kanth,
> > 
> > Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
> > you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
> > (i.e., IGMP only is not enough).
> > 
> > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks pavlin,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> > > 
> > > My testing environment is like below
> > > 
> > > Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> > > 
> > > When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> > > 
> > > In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> > > 
> > > In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result .
> > > 
> > > As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> > > 
> > > My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> > > 
> > > My basic obstacles till now is 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?
> > 
> > The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
> > doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
> > try:
> > * Start with a clean source and build tree
> > 
> > * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
> > ? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.
> > 
> > * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
> > ? properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
> > ? can be cross-compiled).
> > 
> > * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure
> > 
> > * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).
> > 
> > > 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?
> > 
> > For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
> > fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim.
> > 
> > Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
> > as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
> > of XORP).
> > 
> > > 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?
> > 
> > igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
> > must run pim.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pavlin
> > 
> > > Please put in your thoughts .
> > > 
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Kanth
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > > 
> > > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hello friends,
> > > > 
> > > > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> > > The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> > > in tandem with PIM-SM.
> > > 
> > > Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> > > using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Pavlin
> > > 
> > > > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > > > 
> > > > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > > > 
> > > > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > > > 
> > > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket..lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> > > >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2..lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > > > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > > > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > > > 
> > > > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > > > 
> > > > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > > > 
> > > > regards
> > > > Kanth 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > > > Xorp-users mailing list
> > > > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley..EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > > Xorp-users mailing list
> > > Xorp-users at xorp..org
> > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March, 2009 1:58:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> 
> 
>       Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/


From azeem_k at hotmail.com  Wed Mar 25 06:01:24 2009
From: azeem_k at hotmail.com (Azeem Khan)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:01:24 +0000
Subject: [Xorp-users] distributed click support
In-Reply-To: <COL103-W48DDF364C342FBDB16863A8D920@phx.gbl>
References: <COL103-W48DDF364C342FBDB16863A8D920@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <COL103-W231B5C6BFBDE2A595F93848D900@phx.gbl>


Hello,
    
I found the answer to my question in the design docs. XORP currently cannot do what I am interested in but has been designed to be able to do it.

So, I would like to give try over the next few weeks to implement it myself.  To start with, I believe modules related to reading the config file and portions of FEA would have to be changed to accomodate this setup. Are there instructions somewhere on which modules would need to be changed?


Thank You.
Azeem Khan



From: azeem_k at hotmail.com
To: xorp-users at xorp.org
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:34:38 +0000
Subject: [Xorp-users] distributed click support








Hello,

 

  I am interested in using XORP to control the data planes on a set of PCs. i.e. multiple PCs act as a single logical router. The PCs will use Click as the data plane on Linux. The forwarding tables created by XORP will be identical for each PC at first but that may not be true at later stages of my research.

 

  Are these possible? The user manual does not seem to tell in a direct way how.

 

Thank You.

 

 

Azeem Khan


Twice the fun? Share photos while you chat with Windows Live Messenger.
_________________________________________________________________
So many new options, so little time. Windows Live Messenger.
http://www.microsoft.com/india/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090325/3efe2650/attachment.html 

From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Tue Mar 24 08:23:27 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:53:27 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <796858.20385.qm@web94909.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

Hi Pavlin,

I could able to increase the number of multicast seesions by following the ERRATA document.

Still iam looking for the following configuration.

to control only the specific multicast range addresses ? 

I followed your comments but still not with much sucess.

Let me explaing my testing environment and my requirement.

Windows PC ==> WAN =eth0==> Xorp Router(Fedora 8?Machine) =eth1==> LAN ==> Windows PC

Fedora Machine has two N IC cards 

1. eth0 with public ip Wan interface 
2. eth1 with lan interface.

Now what iam trying to do is.

1) i want to limit my xorp router to allow only 239.1.1.0/26 i.e 239.1.1.0 to 239.1.1.127 multicast range IGMP , remaining should be discarded .

This is both in case of server and host i.e 

1) if my lan pc is working as receiver it should only get the stream if the range is within the above specified one.
2) if my lan pc is source at that time also if it is with in the above range then only it?should be?allowed to muliticast.

I think i can use iptables in implementing a firewall in order to discard the packates out side of this range, but this solution would be outside of the xorp.

Iam trying this behavior from the xrop.

thanks and regards
kanth

Iam pasting my config.boot here .

protocols {
/*????? fib2mrib {
???????????????? disable: false
???????????????? }*/
??????? igmp {
??????????????? disable: false
??????????????? interface eth0 {
??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
??????????????????????????????? disable: false
??????????????????????????????? version: 3
??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
??????????????????????????????? }
????????????????? }
????????????????? interface br0 {
????????????????????????? vif br0 {
??????????????????????????????? disable: false
??????????????????????????????? version: 3
??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
??????????????????????????????? }
????????????????? }
??????? }
??????? pimsm4 {
??????????????? disable: false
??????????????? interface eth0 {
??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
??????????????????????????????? disable: false
??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
??????????????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
??????????????????????????????? hello-period: 30
??????????????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
??????????????????????????????? }
??????????????????????? }
??????????????? interface br0 {
??????????????????????? vif br0 {
??????????????????????? disable: false
??????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
??????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
??????????????????????? hello-period: 30
??????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
??????????????????????? }
??????????????? }
??????????????? static-rps {
??????????????????????? rp *.*.*.38 {?? /* this my fedora wan ip */
??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 239.1.1.0/26 {
??????????????????????????????? }
??????????????????????? }
??????????????? }
??????? }
}
fea {
??????? unicast-forwarding4 {
??????????????? disable: false
??????? }
}
interfaces {
??????? restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
??????? interface eth0 {
??????????????? disable: false
??????????????? discard: false
??????????????? description: ""
??????????????? default-system-config {
??????????????? }
??????????????? }
??????? interface br0 {
??????????????? disable: false
??????????????? discard: false
??????????????? description: ""
??????????????? default-system-config {
??????????????? }
??????? }
}
plumbing {
??????? mfea4 {
??????????????? disable: false
??????????????? interface eth0 {
??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
??????????????????????????????? disable: false
??????????????????????? }
??????????????? }
??????????????? interface? br0 {
??????????????????????? vif br0 {
??????????????????????????????? disable: false
??????????????????????? }
??????????????? }
??????? }
}


?
?
RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot pavlin,
> 
> Your comments are indeed very help full for me.
> 
> I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .
> 
> 1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld
> 
> 2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 
> 
> 3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"
> 
> 4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.
> 
> With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.
> 
> Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?

Typically there is few seconds latency when a receiver leaves a
multicast group, because of the way IGMP works.

> To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?

Please see rtrmgr/config/multicast4.boot for a sample configuration
file for multicast routing. Also, see the XORP User Manual for
detail description of the configuration statements.

> How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?

I presume you mean "maximum" instead of "minimum".
I believe for Linux the default max. value is 20 groups (per
interface?).
See the MLD/IGMP and PIM-SM sections in the xorp/ERRATA file for
hints if you need to increase that number.

> Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 

Currently the only control is by specifying the group prefix per
static-rp or for the bootstrap mechanism.
Please add a feature request to Bugzilla for per-interface address
range control.

Regards,
Pavlin

> Please send your comments
> 
> regards
> Kanth
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> Kanth,
> 
> Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
> you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
> (i.e., IGMP only is not enough).
> 
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks pavlin,
> > 
> > 
> > Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> > 
> > My testing environment is like below
> > 
> > Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> > 
> > When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> > 
> > In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> > 
> > In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result .
> > 
> > As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> > 
> > My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> > 
> > My basic obstacles till now is 
> > 
> > 
> > 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?
> 
> The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
> doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
> try:
> * Start with a clean source and build tree
> 
> * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
> ? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.
> 
> * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
> ? properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
> ? can be cross-compiled).
> 
> * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure
> 
> * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).
> 
> > 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?
> 
> For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
> fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim.
> 
> Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
> as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
> of XORP).
> 
> > 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?
> 
> igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
> must run pim.
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> > Please put in your thoughts .
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards
> > Kanth
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > 
> > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello friends,
> > > 
> > > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> > 
> > Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> > The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> > in tandem with PIM-SM.
> > 
> > Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> > using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pavlin
> > 
> > > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > > 
> > > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > > 
> > > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > > 
> > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket..lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> > >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2..lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > > 
> > > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > > 
> > > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Kanth 
> > > ________________________________
> > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > > Xorp-users mailing list
> > > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley..EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
> > 
> > 
> >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp..org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> 
> 
> 
>? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users


________________________________

From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
Sent: Sunday, 22 March, 2009 1:58:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips



      Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090324/2e469178/attachment-0001.html 

From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Wed Mar 25 06:20:06 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:50:06 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <200903241726.n2OHQNVb000755@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<796858.20385.qm@web94909.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903241726.n2OHQNVb000755@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <861910.47248.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

Thanks pavlin ,

Here with the same below setup iam trying to do the reverse operation i.e?Lan PC will be working as a source and the reciver will be in the WAN.

I could not able to receive the streaming?in Wan VLC player .

The logs are attached as .txt file along with this mail.

I gave try by changeing the config.boot as below

??? 
????????????? static-rps {
??????????????????????? rp *.*.2.38 {
??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 224.0.0.0/4 {
??????????????????????????????? }
??????????????????????? }
??????????????? }


Here *.200.2.38 is my eth0 public ip. eth1 is 192.168.1.1 and my lan pc is 192.168.1.10

Should i configure or make some changes in my Wan router like for this specific group 239.1.2.3 rp is 1*.200.2.38 . But my doubt is the xorp router is receving the igmp packets from private nic card i.e in eth1 .
So from eth1 how will it pass the info to eth0. ( is the interface definitions in config.boot will take care ? ).

I have followed the below config.boot only ( which is already in this thread ) except adding the static-rps and register_vif in the pimsm4 and mfea4

Thanks for all your support till now.

regards
kanth 





________________________________
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2009 10:56:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips

Kanth,

Currently XORP doesn't have the mechanism to control the range of
the multicast addresses you need.
This is a valid request that XORP should have such mechanism, hence
please submit a Bugzilla entry so we can track it.

In the mean time you would have to use iptables to apply the
filtering you need.

BTW, in your config you should have interface/vif entry for
"register_vif" in both the mfea4 and pimsm4 sections.

Regards,
Pavlin

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi Pavlin,
> 
> I could able to increase the number of multicast seesions by following the ERRATA document.
> 
> Still iam looking for the following configuration.
> 
> to control only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> 
> I followed your comments but still not with much sucess.
> 
> Let me explaing my testing environment and my requirement.
> 
> Windows PC ==> WAN =eth0==> Xorp Router(Fedora 8?Machine) =eth1==> LAN ==> Windows PC
> 
> Fedora Machine has two N IC cards 
> 
> 1. eth0 with public ip Wan interface 
> 2. eth1 with lan interface.
> 
> Now what iam trying to do is.
> 
> 1) i want to limit my xorp router to allow only 239.1.1.0/26 i.e 239.1.1.0 to 239.1.1.127 multicast range IGMP , remaining should be discarded .
> 
> This is both in case of server and host i.e 
> 
> 1) if my lan pc is working as receiver it should only get the stream if the range is within the above specified one.
> 2) if my lan pc is source at that time also if it is with in the above range then only it?should be?allowed to muliticast.
> 
> I think i can use iptables in implementing a firewall in order to discard the packates out side of this range, but this solution would be outside of the xorp.
> 
> Iam trying this behavior from the xrop.
> 
> thanks and regards
> kanth
> 
> Iam pasting my config.boot here .
> 
> protocols {
> /*????? fib2mrib {
> ???????????????? disable: false
> ???????????????? }*/
> ??????? igmp {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ????????????????? }
> ????????????????? interface br0 {
> ????????????????????????? vif br0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ????????????????? }
> ??????? }
> ??????? pimsm4 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> ??????????????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> ??????????????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? interface br0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> ??????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> ??????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> ??????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> ??????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????????????? static-rps {
> ??????????????????????? rp *.*.*.38 {?? /* this my fedora wan ip */
> ??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 239.1.1.0/26 {
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? }
> }
> fea {
> ??????? unicast-forwarding4 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????? }
> }
> interfaces {
> ??????? restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
> ??????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? discard: false
> ??????????????? description: ""
> ??????????????? default-system-config {
> ??????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? interface br0 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? discard: false
> ??????????????? description: ""
> ??????????????? default-system-config {
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? }
> }
> plumbing {
> ??????? mfea4 {
> ??????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????????????? interface? br0 {
> ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> ??????? }
> }
> 
> 
> ?
> ?
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks a lot pavlin,
> > 
> > Your comments are indeed very help full for me.
> > 
> > I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .
> > 
> > 1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld
> > 
> > 2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 
> > 
> > 3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"
> > 
> > 4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.
> > 
> > With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.
> > 
> > Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?
> 
> Typically there is few seconds latency when a receiver leaves a
> multicast group, because of the way IGMP works..
> 
> > To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?
> 
> Please see rtrmgr/config/multicast4.boot for a sample configuration
> file for multicast routing. Also, see the XORP User Manual for
> detail description of the configuration statements.
> 
> > How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?
> 
> I presume you mean "maximum" instead of "minimum".
> I believe for Linux the default max. value is 20 groups (per
> interface?).
> See the MLD/IGMP and PIM-SM sections in the xorp/ERRATA file for
> hints if you need to increase that number.
> 
> > Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> 
> Currently the only control is by specifying the group prefix per
> static-rp or for the bootstrap mechanism.
> Please add a feature request to Bugzilla for per-interface address
> range control.
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> > Please send your comments
> > 
> > regards
> > Kanth
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> > Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > 
> > Kanth,
> > 
> > Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
> > you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
> > (i.e., IGMP only is not enough).
> > 
> > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo..com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks pavlin,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> > > 
> > > My testing environment is like below
> > > 
> > > Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> > > 
> > > When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> > > 
> > > In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> > > 
> > > In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result ..
> > > 
> > > As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> > > 
> > > My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> > > 
> > > My basic obstacles till now is 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?
> > 
> > The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
> > doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
> > try:
> > * Start with a clean source and build tree
> > 
> > * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
> > ? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.
> > 
> > * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
> > ? properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
> > ? can be cross-compiled).
> > 
> > * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure
> > 
> > * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).
> > 
> > > 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?
> > 
> > For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
> > fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim..
> > 
> > Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
> > as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
> > of XORP).
> > 
> > > 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?
> > 
> > igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
> > must run pim.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pavlin
> > 
> > > Please put in your thoughts .
> > > 
> > > Thanks & Regards
> > > Kanth
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > > 
> > > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hello friends,
> > > > 
> > > > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> > > The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> > > in tandem with PIM-SM.
> > > 
> > > Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> > > using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Pavlin
> > > 
> > > > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > > > 
> > > > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > > > 
> > > > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > > > 
> > > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket..lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> > > >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2..lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > > > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > > > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > > > 
> > > > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > > > 
> > > > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > > > 
> > > > regards
> > > > Kanth 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > > > Xorp-users mailing list
> > > > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley..EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > Download prohibited? No problem. CHAT from any browser, without download.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo..com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > > Xorp-users mailing list
> > > Xorp-users at xorp..org
> > > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >? ? ? Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/_______________________________________________
> > Xorp-users mailing list
> > Xorp-users at xorp.org
> > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March, 2009 1:58:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> 
> 
>? ? ? Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/



      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090325/81e1a9b0/attachment-0001.html 

From pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU  Wed Mar 25 07:35:21 2009
From: pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Pavlin Radoslavov)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:35:21 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <861910.47248.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com> 
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<796858.20385.qm@web94909.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903241726.n2OHQNVb000755@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<861910.47248.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200903251435.n2PEZMtf023573@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>

Kanth,

You need to enable PIM-SM in your WAN router, and all other routers
between you and the multicast source (and the RP). Furthermore, all
PIM-SM routers must have exactly same Cand-RP set, otherwise
multicast routing won't work.

Re. your question of "passing the info" from eth1 to eth0.
The IGMP Join information on eth1 actually becomes PIM-SM Join on
eth0 toward the RP. Those PIM-SM Join messages are propagated
hop-by-hop toward the RP (or the source) hence the need for all
routers in the middle to run PIM-SM and have exactly same Cand-RP
set.
FYI, the choice whether the PIM-SM Join goes toward the RP or the
source depends on several factors. Typically the initial join is
toward the RP, but later the (periodic) joins might go toward the
source.

Hope that helps,
Pavlin

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks pavlin ,
> 
> Here with the same below setup iam trying to do the reverse operation i.e?Lan PC will be working as a source and the reciver will be in the WAN.
> 
> I could not able to receive the streaming?in Wan VLC player .
> 
> The logs are attached as .txt file along with this mail.
> 
> I gave try by changeing the config.boot as below
> 
> ??? 
> ????????????? static-rps {
> ??????????????????????? rp *.*.2.38 {
> ??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 224.0.0.0/4 {
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> 
> 
> Here *.200.2.38 is my eth0 public ip. eth1 is 192.168.1.1 and my lan pc is 192.168.1.10
> 
> Should i configure or make some changes in my Wan router like for this specific group 239.1.2.3 rp is 1*.200.2.38 . But my doubt is the xorp router is receving the igmp packets from private nic card i.e in eth1 .
> So from eth1 how will it pass the info to eth0. ( is the interface definitions in config.boot will take care ? ).
> 
> I have followed the below config.boot only ( which is already in this thread ) except adding the static-rps and register_vif in the pimsm4 and mfea4
> 
> Thanks for all your support till now.
> 
> regards
> kanth 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2009 10:56:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> Kanth,
> 
> Currently XORP doesn't have the mechanism to control the range of
> the multicast addresses you need.
> This is a valid request that XORP should have such mechanism, hence
> please submit a Bugzilla entry so we can track it.
> 
> In the mean time you would have to use iptables to apply the
> filtering you need.
> 
> BTW, in your config you should have interface/vif entry for
> "register_vif" in both the mfea4 and pimsm4 sections.
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pavlin,
> > 
> > I could able to increase the number of multicast seesions by following the ERRATA document.
> > 
> > Still iam looking for the following configuration.
> > 
> > to control only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> > 
> > I followed your comments but still not with much sucess.
> > 
> > Let me explaing my testing environment and my requirement.
> > 
> > Windows PC ==> WAN =eth0==> Xorp Router(Fedora 8?Machine) =eth1==> LAN ==> Windows PC
> > 
> > Fedora Machine has two N IC cards 
> > 
> > 1. eth0 with public ip Wan interface 
> > 2. eth1 with lan interface.
> > 
> > Now what iam trying to do is.
> > 
> > 1) i want to limit my xorp router to allow only 239.1.1.0/26 i.e 239.1.1.0 to 239.1.1.127 multicast range IGMP , remaining should be discarded .
> > 
> > This is both in case of server and host i.e 
> > 
> > 1) if my lan pc is working as receiver it should only get the stream if the range is within the above specified one.
> > 2) if my lan pc is source at that time also if it is with in the above range then only it?should be?allowed to muliticast.
> > 
> > I think i can use iptables in implementing a firewall in order to discard the packates out side of this range, but this solution would be outside of the xorp.
> > 
> > Iam trying this behavior from the xrop.
> > 
> > thanks and regards
> > kanth
> > 
> > Iam pasting my config.boot here .
> > 
> > protocols {
> > /*????? fib2mrib {
> > ???????????????? disable: false
> > ???????????????? }*/
> > ??????? igmp {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> > ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> > ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ????????????????? }
> > ????????????????? interface br0 {
> > ????????????????????????? vif br0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> > ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> > ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ????????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > ??????? pimsm4 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> > ??????????????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> > ??????????????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? interface br0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> > ??????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> > ??????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> > ??????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????????????? static-rps {
> > ??????????????????????? rp *.*.*.38 {?? /* this my fedora wan ip */
> > ??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 239.1.1.0/26 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > fea {
> > ??????? unicast-forwarding4 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > interfaces {
> > ??????? restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
> > ??????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? discard: false
> > ??????????????? description: ""
> > ??????????????? default-system-config {
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? interface br0 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? discard: false
> > ??????????????? description: ""
> > ??????????????? default-system-config {
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > plumbing {
> > ??????? mfea4 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????????????? interface? br0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > ?
> > ?
> > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks a lot pavlin,
> > > 
> > > Your comments are indeed very help full for me.
> > > 
> > > I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .
> > > 
> > > 1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld
> > > 
> > > 2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 
> > > 
> > > 3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"
> > > 
> > > 4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.
> > > 
> > > With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.
> > > 
> > > Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?
> > 
> > Typically there is few seconds latency when a receiver leaves a
> > multicast group, because of the way IGMP works..
> > 
> > > To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?
> > 
> > Please see rtrmgr/config/multicast4.boot for a sample configuration
> > file for multicast routing. Also, see the XORP User Manual for
> > detail description of the configuration statements.
> > 
> > > How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?
> > 
> > I presume you mean "maximum" instead of "minimum".
> > I believe for Linux the default max. value is 20 groups (per
> > interface?).
> > See the MLD/IGMP and PIM-SM sections in the xorp/ERRATA file for
> > hints if you need to increase that number.
> > 
> > > Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> > 
> > Currently the only control is by specifying the group prefix per
> > static-rp or for the bootstrap mechanism.
> > Please add a feature request to Bugzilla for per-interface address
> > range control.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pavlin
> > 
> > > Please send your comments
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Kanth
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > > 
> > > Kanth,
> > > 
> > > Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
> > > you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
> > > (i.e., IGMP only is not enough).
> > > 
> > > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo..com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Thanks pavlin,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> > > > 
> > > > My testing environment is like below
> > > > 
> > > > Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> > > > 
> > > > When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> > > > 
> > > > In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> > > > 
> > > > In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result ..
> > > > 
> > > > As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> > > > 
> > > > My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> > > > 
> > > > My basic obstacles till now is 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?
> > > 
> > > The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
> > > doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
> > > try:
> > > * Start with a clean source and build tree
> > > 
> > > * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
> > > ? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.
> > > 
> > > * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
> > > ? properly (e.g., try to cross-compile other software that you know
> > > ? can be cross-compiled).
> > > 
> > > * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure
> > > 
> > > * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).
> > > 
> > > > 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?
> > > 
> > > For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
> > > fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim..
> > > 
> > > Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
> > > as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
> > > of XORP).
> > > 
> > > > 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?
> > > 
> > > igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
> > > must run pim.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Pavlin
> > > 
> > > > Please put in your thoughts .
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > Kanth
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > > > Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > > > 
> > > > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello friends,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> > > > The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> > > > in tandem with PIM-SM.
> > > > 
> > > > Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> > > > using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Pavlin
> > > > 
> > > > > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > > > > 
> > > > > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > > > > 
> > > > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket..lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> > > > >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2..lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > > > > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > > > > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > > > > 
> > > > > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > regards
> > > > > Kanth 


From varala_kanth at yahoo.com  Wed Mar 25 11:04:52 2009
From: varala_kanth at yahoo.com (RamaKanthVarala)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:34:52 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
In-Reply-To: <200903251435.n2PEZMtf023573@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <538904.15226.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903201740.n2KHemNj006375@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<450076.66523.qm@web94905.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903212028.n2LKS5AZ023840@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<796858.20385.qm@web94909.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903241726.n2OHQNVb000755@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
	<861910.47248.qm@web94903.mail.in2.yahoo.com>
	<200903251435.n2PEZMtf023573@fruitcake.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Message-ID: <630266.57332.qm@web94916.mail.in2.yahoo.com>

pavlin,

As i told you in my previous mails the reverse is working i.e 
wan pc --> HUB --> (eth0) xorp router ( fedoralinux box ) (eth 1) ---> lan pc 

Here in xorp router machine CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V2=y is enabled.

As for as the wan router is concerned when the streaming is being passed between the wan pc and lan pc is that not cofirm that even in router also PIMSM enabled ..?

Iam using the same setup except now wan pc is host and lan pc is source.

My primary doubt is in my configuration .
Here 192.168.1.10 is my lan pc and 239.1.2.3 is the multicast range to which iam streaming.

When we check the follwing messages it's printing in console
as " mfea_mrouter.cc get_sg_count ] ioctl(SIOCGETSGCNT, (192.168.1.10 239.1.2.3)) failed:
Cannot assign requested address "

These are printed immedialtely when i start streaming in mylan pc.

I think i should add properly static-rps in configuration file .

Please guide me in this regard

kanth

ps:if this mail already reached you kindly ignore this one , iam experiencing some internet problems in my end



________________________________
From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
Sent: Wednesday, 25 March, 2009 8:05:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips

Kanth,

You need to enable PIM-SM in your WAN router, and all other routers
between you and the multicast source (and the RP). Furthermore, all
PIM-SM routers must have exactly same Cand-RP set, otherwise
multicast routing won't work.

Re. your question of "passing the info" from eth1 to eth0.
The IGMP Join information on eth1 actually becomes PIM-SM Join on
eth0 toward the RP. Those PIM-SM Join messages are propagated
hop-by-hop toward the RP (or the source) hence the need for all
routers in the middle to run PIM-SM and have exactly same Cand-RP
set.
FYI, the choice whether the PIM-SM Join goes toward the RP or the
source depends on several factors. Typically the initial join is
toward the RP, but later the (periodic) joins might go toward the
source.

Hope that helps,
Pavlin

RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks pavlin ,
> 
> Here with the same below setup iam trying to do the reverse operation i.e?Lan PC will be working as a source and the reciver will be in the WAN.
> 
> I could not able to receive the streaming?in Wan VLC player .
> 
> The logs are attached as .txt file along with this mail.
> 
> I gave try by changeing the config.boot as below
> 
> ??? 
> ????????????? static-rps {
> ??????????????????????? rp *.*.2.38 {
> ??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 224.0.0.0/4 {
> ??????????????????????????????? }
> ??????????????????????? }
> ??????????????? }
> 
> 
> Here *.200.2.38 is my eth0 public ip. eth1 is 192.168.1.1 and my lan pc is 192.168.1.10
> 
> Should i configure or make some changes in my Wan router like for this specific group 239.1.2.3 rp is 1*.200.2.38 . But my doubt is the xorp router is receving the igmp packets from private nic card i.e in eth1 .
> So from eth1 how will it pass the info to eth0. ( is the interface definitions in config.boot will take care ? ).
> 
> I have followed the below config.boot only ( which is already in this thread ) except adding the static-rps and register_vif in the pimsm4 and mfea4
> 
> Thanks for all your support till now.
> 
> regards
> kanth 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March, 2009 10:56:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> 
> Kanth,
> 
> Currently XORP doesn't have the mechanism to control the range of
> the multicast addresses you need.
> This is a valid request that XORP should have such mechanism, hence
> please submit a Bugzilla entry so we can track it.
> 
> In the mean time you would have to use iptables to apply the
> filtering you need.
> 
> BTW, in your config you should have interface/vif entry for
> "register_vif" in both the mfea4 and pimsm4 sections.
> 
> Regards,
> Pavlin
> 
> RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pavlin,
> > 
> > I could able to increase the number of multicast seesions by following the ERRATA document.
> > 
> > Still iam looking for the following configuration.
> > 
> > to control only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> > 
> > I followed your comments but still not with much sucess.
> > 
> > Let me explaing my testing environment and my requirement.
> > 
> > Windows PC ==> WAN =eth0==> Xorp Router(Fedora 8?Machine) =eth1==> LAN ==> Windows PC
> > 
> > Fedora Machine has two N IC cards 
> > 
> > 1. eth0 with public ip Wan interface 
> > 2. eth1 with lan interface.
> > 
> > Now what iam trying to do is.
> > 
> > 1) i want to limit my xorp router to allow only 239.1.1.0/26 i.e 239.1.1.0 to 239.1.1.127 multicast range IGMP , remaining should be discarded .
> > 
> > This is both in case of server and host i.e 
> > 
> > 1) if my lan pc is working as receiver it should only get the stream if the range is within the above specified one.
> > 2) if my lan pc is source at that time also if it is with in the above range then only it?should be?allowed to muliticast.
> > 
> > I think i can use iptables in implementing a firewall in order to discard the packates out side of this range, but this solution would be outside of the xorp.
> > 
> > Iam trying this behavior from the xrop.
> > 
> > thanks and regards
> > kanth
> > 
> > Iam pasting my config.boot here .
> > 
> > protocols {
> > /*????? fib2mrib {
> > ???????????????? disable: false
> > ???????????????? }*/
> > ??????? igmp {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> > ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> > ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ????????????????? }
> > ????????????????? interface br0 {
> > ????????????????????????? vif br0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????????????? version: 3
> > ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-interval: 125
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-last-member-interval: 1
> > ??????????????????????????????? query-response-interval: 10
> > ??????????????????????????????? robust-count: 2
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ????????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > ??????? pimsm4 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> > ??????????????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> > ??????????????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? interface br0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> > ??????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????? /*enable-ip-router-alert-option-check: false */
> > ??????????????????????? dr-priority: 1
> > ??????????????????????? hello-period: 30
> > ??????????????????????? hello-triggered-delay: 5
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????????????? static-rps {
> > ??????????????????????? rp *.*.*.38 {?? /* this my fedora wan ip */
> > ??????????????????????????????? group-prefix 239.1.1.0/26 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > fea {
> > ??????? unicast-forwarding4 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > interfaces {
> > ??????? restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
> > ??????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? discard: false
> > ??????????????? description: ""
> > ??????????????? default-system-config {
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? interface br0 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? discard: false
> > ??????????????? description: ""
> > ??????????????? default-system-config {
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > plumbing {
> > ??????? mfea4 {
> > ??????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????? interface eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif eth0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????????????? interface? br0 {
> > ??????????????????????? vif br0 {
> > ??????????????????????????????? disable: false
> > ??????????????????????? }
> > ??????????????? }
> > ??????? }
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > ?
> > ?
> > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Thanks a lot pavlin,
> > > 
> > > Your comments are indeed very help full for me.
> > > 
> > > I could able to resolve the compilation issues. Following are my changes .
> > > 
> > > 1) --wiith-LD = mips-linux-ld
> > > 
> > > 2) CFLAGS = "mxgots" 
> > > 
> > > 3) CXXFLAGS = "mxgots"
> > > 
> > > 4) Enableing the PIMSM V1, PIMSM V2 and IPIP kernal modules.
> > > 
> > > With above changes?i could able to run the xorp on my target board.
> > > 
> > > Through testing i found that it doesnot support immedieate leave , am i right ?
> > 
> > Typically there is few seconds latency when a receiver leaves a
> > multicast group, because of the way IGMP works..
> > 
> > > To ?supports? this do i need change any thing in config.boot ?
> > 
> > Please see rtrmgr/config/multicast4.boot for a sample configuration
> > file for multicast routing. Also, see the XORP User Manual for
> > detail description of the configuration statements.
> > 
> > > How?many minimum number of multicast groups it can support ?
> > 
> > I presume you mean "maximum" instead of "minimum".
> > I believe for Linux the default max. value is 20 groups (per
> > interface?).
> > See the MLD/IGMP and PIM-SM sections in the xorp/ERRATA file for
> > hints if you need to increase that number.
> > 
> > > Do we have any control like on the specific interface we?can allow only the specific multicast range addresses ? 
> > 
> > Currently the only control is by specifying the group prefix per
> > static-rp or for the bootstrap mechanism.
> > Please add a feature request to Bugzilla for per-interface address
> > range control.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pavlin
> > 
> > > Please send your comments
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Kanth
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley..EDU>; xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2009 11:10:48 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > > 
> > > Kanth,
> > > 
> > > Before I try to answer your questions I'd like to emphasize that if
> > > you want to use XORP for multicast routing, you MUST use PIM-SM
> > > (i.e., IGMP only is not enough).
> > > 
> > > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo..com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Thanks pavlin,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Iam using the latest stable version 1.6 .
> > > > 
> > > > My testing environment is like below
> > > > 
> > > > Windows PC (server )====WAN ===> Fedor 8 Linux PC =====Private Lan ===> Windows PC (client/host)
> > > > 
> > > > When i compile the source with fedora 8 version i did not had any problems.
> > > > 
> > > > In linux pc iam using the iptables to give me the NAT functionality to windows PC .
> > > > 
> > > > In this when i compiled for fedora 8 and tested it , the video stream is received by the client PC from server PC in short it gave me the expected result ..
> > > > 
> > > > As same like above now my target board with mips on it is between server and client instead of fedora Linux PC.
> > > > 
> > > > My intention is?to get the same result what i got with the linux pc.I hope i can achive the same ..!
> > > > 
> > > > My basic obstacles till now is 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 1) Compilation problems in the BGP and FEA modules..?
> > > 
> > > The error you are seeing ("... is not a valid libtool object")
> > > doesn't indicate an obvious issue. Here are few things that you can
> > > try:
> > > * Start with a clean source and build tree
> > > 
> > > * Don't use parallel make like "gmake -j4" in case you are. You
> > > ? could try "gmake -j1", but I think "-j1" is the default anyway.
> > > 
> > > * Double-check that your cross-compilation environment is setup
> > > ? properly (e.g.., try to cross-compile other software that you know
> > > ? can be cross-compiled).
> > > 
> > > * Try using "--enable-static --disable-shared" argument to ./configure
> > > 
> > > * Try using older XORP release (e.g., XORP-1.5).
> > > 
> > > > 2) Do they really need to be compiled in order to use igmp ..?
> > > 
> > > For multicast you need (at least) the following processes/modules:
> > > fea/mfea, igmp, rib, fib2mrib, pim..
> > > 
> > > Depends on the setup, you might need some unicast routing protocols
> > > as well (unless all unicast routes are static and installed outside
> > > of XORP).
> > > 
> > > > 3) What are all the modules does igmp depend on ..?
> > > 
> > > igmp itself depends only on fea/mfea, but as I mentioned before you
> > > must run pim.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Pavlin
> > > 
> > > > Please put in your thoughts .
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks & Regards
> > > > Kanth
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Pavlin Radoslavov <pavlin at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
> > > > To: RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com>
> > > > Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009 10:40:25 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] compilation problmes with mips
> > > > 
> > > > RamaKanthVarala <varala_kanth at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello friends,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I want to use the xorp as igmp proxy.
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately you can't use XORP as IGMP proxy.
> > > > The IGMP implementation in XORP is the router-side, and it is used
> > > > in tandem with PIM-SM.
> > > > 
> > > > Re. the "libtool object" error below, what XORP version are you
> > > > using? The latest 1.6 release or the code from CVS?
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Pavlin
> > > > 
> > > > > I want to put this into one of my target board which has mips as its o.s.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I configured with options like host as mips-linux? and --with-openssl to corresponding package.
> > > > > 
> > > > > When? i make it i get the following error.
> > > > > 
> > > > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX?? --mode=link mips-linux-g++? -g -Werror -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -ftemplate-depth-25 -pipe?? -o libxorp_fibconfig.la? fibconfig_entry_get_click.lo fibconfig_entry_get_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_get_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_click.lo fibconfig_entry_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_entry_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_entry_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_entry_set_routing_socket...lo fibconfig_entry_set_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_forwarding_dummy.lo fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo
> > > > >? fibconfig_forwarding_solaris.lo fibconfig_forwarding_sysctl.lo fibconfig_forwarding_windows.lo fibconfig_table_get_click.lo fibconfig_table_get_dummy..lo fibconfig_table_get_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_get_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_get_sysctl.lo fibconfig_table_observer_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_observer_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_observer_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_observer_rtmv2.lo fibconfig_table_parse_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_parse_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_click.lo fibconfig_table_set_dummy.lo fibconfig_table_set_iphelper.lo fibconfig_table_set_netlink_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_routing_socket.lo fibconfig_table_set_rtmv2..lo? -lcrypto? -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl -L/root/SW/userapps/opensource/openssl/lib -lrt
> > > > > libtool: link: `fibconfig_forwarding_proc_linux.lo' is not a valid libtool object
> > > > > make: *** [libxorp_fibconfig.la] Error 1
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another general doubt is what are all the components needed for igmp to work ..
> > > > > 
> > > > > If i donot include fea and ospf does it work..?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Your help will be highly appreciated in this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > regards
> > > > > Kanth 



      Cricket on your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter http://beta.cricket.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090325/792a1ffb/attachment-0001.html 

From stegen at owns.com  Wed Mar 25 13:26:03 2009
From: stegen at owns.com (Stegen Smith)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:26:03 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] announce default route via bgp
Message-ID: <49CA935B.2090307@owns.com>

Hey Group,

I'm wondering if someone may have a little guidance on this one.  I've been mucking about with
trying to get xorp bgp to announce a default route to a bgp peer, but haven't been able to figure
that one out.  Obviously there's no 'default-originate' config option, and I've been unable to find
a way to force 0.0.0.0/0 down a peer's throat, so I must just be missing something.  Has anyone else
done this, and would you mind sharing the wealth?

thanks!
stegen


From bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in  Sun Mar 29 06:15:38 2009
From: bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in (bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in)
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:45:38 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] config file with OSPF or some sort of routing working
In-Reply-To: <mailman.7188.1238007081.544.xorp-users@xorp.org>
References: <mailman.7188.1238007081.544.xorp-users@xorp.org>
Message-ID: <78ecaad4e37ad75424290a63cdb31902.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>

Hello friends,

      Can anyone send me the config file which has
OSPF or some sort of routing working?

      Thanks in Advance for the help.


Regards,
Bhavin.


From nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net  Mon Mar 30 11:40:37 2009
From: nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net (Nithya Chandrakesan)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:40:37 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] config file with OSPF or some sort of routing
	working
In-Reply-To: <78ecaad4e37ad75424290a63cdb31902.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
References: <mailman.7188.1238007081.544.xorp-users@xorp.org>
	<78ecaad4e37ad75424290a63cdb31902.squirrel@gpo.iitb.ac.in>
Message-ID: <1dfe63a80903301140l78fe9369r69eba1f65879d63d@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bhavin,

I had attached the sample config to enable OSPF routing.

For sample .boot files, please refer to the directory xorp/rtrmgr/config/,
which has protocol(RIP/RIPng/BGP/OSPF) specific .boot files. Make sure to
change the interface name and IP address.

Thanks,
Nithya.

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:15 AM, <bhavin81 at iitb.ac.in> wrote:

> Hello friends,
>
>      Can anyone send me the config file which has
> OSPF or some sort of routing working?
>
>      Thanks in Advance for the help.
>
>
> Regards,
> Bhavin.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users<http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090330/e194ee9d/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
XORP-1 Config
================
interfaces {
    ethernet eth4 {
        router {
            address 42.1.1.1 {
                prefix-length: 24
            }
        }
    }
}

fea {
    unicast-forwarding4 {
        disable: false
    }
}

protocols {
    ospf4 {
        router-id: 10.10.10.60
        area 0.0.0.0 {
            interface eth4 {
                address 42.1.1.1 {
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

From greearb at candelatech.com  Mon Mar 30 15:05:04 2009
From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:05:04 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] Issue with shared libraries in latest cvs tree?
Message-ID: <49D14210.1060100@candelatech.com>

I pulled down the latest cvs code today, merged with my own hacks, and built xorp.

It seems that xorp_rib is not properly dealt with by the install script:

  /usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib seems to be looking for /usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib,
but that is not installed by 'make install'.

I can probably get this particular issue working easily enough, but I wanted to make sure that
I'm not mis-understanding the problem entirely?

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


From nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net  Mon Mar 30 15:14:28 2009
From: nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net (Nithya Chandrakesan)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:14:28 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] Issue with shared libraries in latest cvs tree?
In-Reply-To: <49D14210.1060100@candelatech.com>
References: <49D14210.1060100@candelatech.com>
Message-ID: <1dfe63a80903301514q71bdc0ber86df3d0eaa316b42@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ben,

Please use XORP 1.6 release. The latest CVS code is broken. And we have a
bug entry(Bugzilla id:1058) opened to fix this issue.

Thanks,
Nithya.



On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> wrote:

> I pulled down the latest cvs code today, merged with my own hacks, and
> built xorp.
>
> It seems that xorp_rib is not properly dealt with by the install script:
>
>  /usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib seems to be looking for
> /usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib,
> but that is not installed by 'make install'.
>
> I can probably get this particular issue working easily enough, but I
> wanted to make sure that
> I'm not mis-understanding the problem entirely?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-users mailing list
> Xorp-users at xorp.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users<http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090330/f4c318e0/attachment.html 

From greearb at candelatech.com  Mon Mar 30 15:19:25 2009
From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:19:25 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] Issue with shared libraries in latest cvs tree?
In-Reply-To: <1dfe63a80903301514q71bdc0ber86df3d0eaa316b42@mail.gmail.com>
References: <49D14210.1060100@candelatech.com>
	<1dfe63a80903301514q71bdc0ber86df3d0eaa316b42@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <49D1456D.1080504@candelatech.com>

Nithya Chandrakesan wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>  
> Please use XORP 1.6 release. The latest CVS code is broken. And we have 
> a bug entry(Bugzilla id:1058) opened to fix this issue.
>  
> Thanks,
> Nithya.

It seems I'm not authorized to view this bug.  If it's only with xorp_rib,
I think I can fix it.

Maybe it's more critical?

Any estimate for when the top-of-tree will be stable-ish again?

Any chance you can somehow make it so that I can access the bug?

Thanks,
Ben

> 
> 
>  
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com 
> <mailto:greearb at candelatech.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I pulled down the latest cvs code today, merged with my own hacks,
>     and built xorp.
> 
>     It seems that xorp_rib is not properly dealt with by the install script:
> 
>      /usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib seems to be looking for
>     /usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib,
>     but that is not installed by 'make install'.
> 
>     I can probably get this particular issue working easily enough, but
>     I wanted to make sure that
>     I'm not mis-understanding the problem entirely?
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Ben
> 
>     --
>     Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com <mailto:greearb at candelatech.com>>
>     Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>     <http://www.candelatech.com/>
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Xorp-users mailing list
>     Xorp-users at xorp.org <mailto:Xorp-users at xorp.org>
>     http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>     <http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users>
> 
> 


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


From nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net  Mon Mar 30 15:31:45 2009
From: nithya.chandrakesan at xorp.net (Nithya Chandrakesan)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:31:45 -0700
Subject: [Xorp-users] Issue with shared libraries in latest cvs tree?
In-Reply-To: <49D1456D.1080504@candelatech.com>
References: <49D14210.1060100@candelatech.com>
	<1dfe63a80903301514q71bdc0ber86df3d0eaa316b42@mail.gmail.com>
	<49D1456D.1080504@candelatech.com>
Message-ID: <1dfe63a80903301531p4f484e32hfb75e202b5c9dcc@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ben,

It seems I'm not authorized to view this bug.  If it's only with xorp_rib,
I think I can fix it.
>> It is not the problem with xorp_rib alone. The bug is opened for
xorp_rtrmgr process. The code became unstable during a rewrite.
>> CVS is now locked for commits. Soon we will rollout our new codebase.
Please wait for the announcement. In the meantime, you can use xorp1.6
release. There is not much difference between 1.6code and top-of-tree
functionality-wise.

Maybe it's more critical?

Any estimate for when the top-of-tree will be stable-ish again?

Any chance you can somehow make it so that I can access the bug?
Thanks,
Nithya.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> wrote:

> Nithya Chandrakesan wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>  Please use XORP 1.6 release. The latest CVS code is broken. And we have a
>> bug entry(Bugzilla id:1058) opened to fix this issue.
>>  Thanks,
>> Nithya.
>>
>
> It seems I'm not authorized to view this bug.  If it's only with xorp_rib,
> I think I can fix it.
>
> Maybe it's more critical?
>
> Any estimate for when the top-of-tree will be stable-ish again?
>
> Any chance you can somehow make it so that I can access the bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
>>
>>  On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com<mailto:
>> greearb at candelatech.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    I pulled down the latest cvs code today, merged with my own hacks,
>>    and built xorp.
>>
>>    It seems that xorp_rib is not properly dealt with by the install
>> script:
>>
>>     /usr/local/xorp/rib/xorp_rib seems to be looking for
>>    /usr/local/xorp/rib/.libs/xorp_rib,
>>    but that is not installed by 'make install'.
>>
>>    I can probably get this particular issue working easily enough, but
>>    I wanted to make sure that
>>    I'm not mis-understanding the problem entirely?
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>    Ben
>>
>>    --
>>    Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com <mailto:greearb at candelatech.com>>
>>    Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>>    <http://www.candelatech.com/>
>>
>>    _______________________________________________
>>    Xorp-users mailing list
>>    Xorp-users at xorp.org <mailto:Xorp-users at xorp.org>
>>    http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users<http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users>
>>    <http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>  Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20090330/bc24e19a/attachment.html