From chicho.mancho at gmail.com Tue Feb 2 06:16:31 2010 From: chicho.mancho at gmail.com (Chicho Mancho) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:16:31 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM SM and VLAN Message-ID: <1265120191.2036.30.camel@MyPC> Hi there, I'm new to XORP and I'm trying to run PIM SM, but using a VLAN vif for connection to the pim neighbor. I did a few experiments and found that when I configure a vlan vif it is not possible for xorpsh to commit - some problem with MFEA. Then I read the manual more thoroughly and find that I have to define FEA and MFEA. I did so and noticed that the problem appears even before make a PIM configuration. The test set-up is very simple: ubuntu linux PC with XORP --- Router First the working configuration: root at MyPC# show protocols { pimsm4 { interface eth0 { vif eth0 { } } } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { } } interfaces { interface eth0 { vif eth0 { address 10.10.10.254 { prefix-length: 24 } } } } plumbing { mfea4 { interface eth0 { vif eth0 { } } } } [edit] This configuration is working the protocol goes up. PIM neighbor says the same thing - UP. Then I made a configuration without configuring PIM, but with VLAN vif: root at MyPC# show fea { unicast-forwarding4 { } } interfaces { interface eth0 { vif eth0 { address 10.10.10.254 { prefix-length: 24 } } vif vlan456 { vlan { vlan-id: 456 } address 192.168.168.254 { prefix-length: 24 } } } } > plumbing { > mfea4 { > } > } xorp did not commit! When I make the configuration without vif vlan456 there is no problem - xorp commits. When I make the same configuration but without "plumbing" there is no problem- xorp commits and I have ping to VLAN interface on the other end: interfaces { interface eth0 { vif eth0 { address 10.10.10.254 { prefix-length: 24 } } vif vlan456 { vlan { vlan-id: 456 } address 192.168.168.254 { prefix-length: 24 } } } } I need a hand to deal with the problem. If you don't get a clear picture, please write to me for additional information. Thanks in advance. Regards, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100202/5a1440ca/attachment.html From saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com Thu Feb 4 07:12:17 2010 From: saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com (saurabh) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 20:42:17 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp Message-ID: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> Dear xorp users, Is is possible to use only PIM and IGMP functioanlities of xrop Among the whole routing platform. I want to use them as seprate deamons to run in my system. As in my system I am using quagga for other unicast routing, and I want these (PIM and IGMP for multicast) Can anybudy have any Idea.. Any Hint... Thanks, Saurabh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100204/11ade5f0/attachment.html From william at losrios.edu Thu Feb 4 07:19:24 2010 From: william at losrios.edu (Williams, Mark) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:19:24 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> Message-ID: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> It works, though it is "not supported." Make sure to use the fib2mrib directive in your configuration. -Mark ________________________________ From: xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] On Behalf Of saurabh Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:12 AM To: xorp-users at xorp.org Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp Dear xorp users, Is is possible to use only PIM and IGMP functioanlities of xrop Among the whole routing platform. I want to use them as seprate deamons to run in my system. As in my system I am using quagga for other unicast routing, and I want these (PIM and IGMP for multicast) Can anybudy have any Idea.... Any Hint..... Thanks, Saurabh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100204/107c2327/attachment.html From jhay at meraka.org.za Thu Feb 4 07:58:16 2010 From: jhay at meraka.org.za (John Hay) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 17:58:16 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> Message-ID: <20100204155816.GB88898@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> Hi Mark, On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:19:24AM -0800, Williams, Mark wrote: > It works, though it is "not supported." Make sure to use the fib2mrib directive in your configuration. > I am also interested in this. Do you have an example configuration that one can look at or start with? My attemps on FreeBSD killed my IPv6 connectivity. :-/ Thanks John -- John Hay -- jhay at meraka.csir.co.za / jhay at FreeBSD.org > -Mark > > ________________________________ > From: xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] On Behalf Of saurabh > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:12 AM > To: xorp-users at xorp.org > Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp > > > > Dear xorp users, > > Is is possible to use only PIM and IGMP functioanlities of xrop > Among the whole routing platform. I want to use them as seprate > deamons to run in my system. > > As in my system I am using quagga for other unicast routing, and > I want these (PIM and IGMP for multicast) > Can anybudy have any Idea.... Any Hint..... > > Thanks, > Saurabh > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From jorn.rikkers at nl.thalesgroup.com Thu Feb 4 08:08:18 2010 From: jorn.rikkers at nl.thalesgroup.com (Rikkers Jorn) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:08:18 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> Message-ID: <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> Hi Saurabh, I've successfully ran such a configuration; PIM and IGMP (XORP) with OSPF (Quagga). Like Mark says you do need the fib2mirib directive in your configuration. Why don't you want to use XORP for unicast routing? Jorn Rikkers On 04-02-2010 16:19, Williams, Mark wrote: > > It works, though it is ?not supported.? Make sure to use the fib2mrib > directive in your configuration. > > -Mark > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org > [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] *On Behalf Of *saurabh > *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:12 AM > *To:* xorp-users at xorp.org > *Subject:* [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp > > Dear xorp users, > > Is is possible to use only PIM and IGMP functioanlities of xrop > > Among the whole routing platform. I want to use them as seprate > > deamons to run in my system. > > > *As in my system I am using quagga for other unicast routing, and* > > > *I want these (PIM and IGMP for multicast)* > > Can anybudy have any Idea?. Any Hint?.. > > Thanks, > > Saurabh > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Jorn Rikkers *This message contains Unclassified information* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender and delete it. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of this email or its attachment(s) is forbidden. Thales Nederland BV will not accept liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachment(s). Thales Nederland BV is seated in Hengelo and is registered at the Chamber of Commerce under number 06061578. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From william at losrios.edu Thu Feb 4 08:39:26 2010 From: william at losrios.edu (Williams, Mark) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:39:26 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> Message-ID: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E6906AD@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> I'm doing it because there is a bug in XORP with OSPF and MD5 authentication. Here's my config (IPv4 only): protocols { fib2mrib { } igmp { interface OUTSIDE { vif OUTSIDE { } } interface ADMIN { vif ADMIN { } } interface INSTRUCT { vif INSTRUCT { } } interface SERVICE { vif SERVICE { } } interface VOICE { vif VOICE { } } interface CNS { vif CNS { } } } pimsm4 { interface OUTSIDE { vif OUTSIDE { } } interface ADMIN { vif ADMIN { } } interface INSTRUCT { vif INSTRUCT { } } interface CNS { vif CNS { } } interface SERVICE { vif SERVICE { } } interface VOICE { vif VOICE { } } interface "register_vif" { vif "register_vif" { } } bootstrap { } } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { } } interfaces { interface OUTSIDE { default-system-config } interface SERVICE { default-system-config } interface ADMIN { default-system-config } interface INSTRUCT { default-system-config } interface VOICE { default-system-config } interface CNS { default-system-config } } plumbing { mfea4 { interface OUTSIDE { vif OUTSIDE { } } interface ADMIN { vif ADMIN { } } interface CNS { vif CNS { } } interface INSTRUCT { vif INSTRUCT { } } interface SERVICE { vif SERVICE { } } interface VOICE { vif VOICE { } } interface "register_vif" { vif "register_vif" { } } } rib { } } -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Rikkers Jorn [mailto:jorn.rikkers at nl.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 08:08 To: Williams, Mark Cc: saurabh; xorp-users at xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp Hi Saurabh, I've successfully ran such a configuration; PIM and IGMP (XORP) with OSPF (Quagga). Like Mark says you do need the fib2mirib directive in your configuration. Why don't you want to use XORP for unicast routing? Jorn Rikkers On 04-02-2010 16:19, Williams, Mark wrote: > > It works, though it is "not supported." Make sure to use the fib2mrib > directive in your configuration. > > -Mark > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org > [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] *On Behalf Of *saurabh > *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:12 AM > *To:* xorp-users at xorp.org > *Subject:* [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp > > Dear xorp users, > > Is is possible to use only PIM and IGMP functioanlities of xrop > > Among the whole routing platform. I want to use them as seprate > > deamons to run in my system. > > > *As in my system I am using quagga for other unicast routing, and* > > > *I want these (PIM and IGMP for multicast)* > > Can anybudy have any Idea.... Any Hint..... > > Thanks, > > Saurabh > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Jorn Rikkers *This message contains Unclassified information* ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender and delete it. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of this email or its attachment(s) is forbidden. Thales Nederland BV will not accept liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachment(s). Thales Nederland BV is seated in Hengelo and is registered at the Chamber of Commerce under number 06061578. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From esj at cs.fiu.edu Thu Feb 4 14:36:38 2010 From: esj at cs.fiu.edu (Eric S. Johnson) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E6906AD@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E6906AD@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> Message-ID: <20100204223638.7B901B8843B@cheetah.cs.fiu.edu> william at losrios.edu said: > I'm doing it because there is a bug in XORP with OSPF and MD5 > authentication. I ran into that bug too. You can "fix it" on cisco routers with the interface command ip ospf lls disable IE interface Vlan16 ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y ip pim sparse-mode ip ospf authentication message-digest ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 045D19095E2F404F1F4A0B ip ospf cost xx ip ospf priority 129 ip ospf lls disable Haven't looked into other vendors as all I have on the lan that uses OSPF MD5 is cisco and quagga (which doesn't do lls) and xorp. E From esj at cs.fiu.edu Thu Feb 4 14:56:39 2010 From: esj at cs.fiu.edu (Eric S. Johnson) Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM SM and VLAN In-Reply-To: <1265120191.2036.30.camel@MyPC> References: <1265120191.2036.30.camel@MyPC> Message-ID: <20100204225639.4E68DB8840A@cheetah.cs.fiu.edu> chicho.mancho at gmail.com said: > This configuration is working the protocol goes up. PIM neighbor > says the same thing - UP. > Then I made a configuration without configuring PIM, but with VLAN > vif: Interesting. I hit this just the other day... interface eth0 { vif "eth0.xx" { disable: false vlan { vlan-id: xx } address x.x.x.x { prefix-length: xx disable: false } } vif "eth0.yy" { disable: false vlan { vlan-id: yy } address yy.yy.yy.yy { prefix-length: yy disable: false } } style declarations would not work with plumbing config like this plumbing { mfea4 { interface eth0 { vif "eth0.xx" { disable: false } vif "eth0.yy" { disable: false } } interface register_vif { vif register_vif { disable: false } } } } It wouldn't let me commit it. But if your interface configs are like this interfaces { interface "eth0.xx" { description: "" disable: false discard: false unreachable: false management: false vif "eth0.xx" { disable: false address xx.xx.xx.xx { prefix-length: xx disable: false } } } interface "eth0.yy" { description: "" disable: false discard: false unreachable: false management: false vif "eth0.yy" { disable: false address yy.yy.yy.yy { prefix-length: yy disable: false } } } } and your plumbing is plumbing { mfea4 { disable: false interface "eth0.xx" { vif "eth0.xx" { disable: false } } interface "eth0.yy" { vif "eth0.yy" { disable: false } } interface "register_vif" { vif "register_vif" { disable: false } } } } It takes it fine and works. This is on CentOS linux 5.4 with kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 Odd eh? In either case I had let CentOS create the vlans (but not assign layer 3 addresses) before starting xorp. A post to this list last year from Pavlin Radoslavov was what made me think to try that. http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-users/2009-February/003032.html So I guess it is a known bug. E From adrian.haralambiev at gmail.com Thu Feb 4 23:33:48 2010 From: adrian.haralambiev at gmail.com (Adrian Haralambiev) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:33:48 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM SM and VLAN In-Reply-To: <20100204225639.4E68DB8840A@cheetah.cs.fiu.edu> References: <1265120191.2036.30.camel@MyPC> <20100204225639.4E68DB8840A@cheetah.cs.fiu.edu> Message-ID: <9bb6c3721002042333n47e44603mfb05dd420dc07b46@mail.gmail.com> Dear Eric, Thank you for your feedback. I'll give it a try. Another odd thing here is that the post from Pavlin is one year ago. Regards, Adrian On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Eric S. Johnson wrote: > > chicho.mancho at gmail.com said: > > This configuration is working the protocol goes up. PIM neighbor > > says the same thing - UP. > > > Then I made a configuration without configuring PIM, but with VLAN > > vif: > > Interesting. I hit this just the other day... > > interface eth0 { > vif "eth0.xx" { > disable: false > vlan { > vlan-id: xx > } > address x.x.x.x { > prefix-length: xx > disable: false > } > } > vif "eth0.yy" { > disable: false > vlan { > vlan-id: yy > } > address yy.yy.yy.yy { > prefix-length: yy > disable: false > } > } > > > style declarations would not work with plumbing config like this > > plumbing { > mfea4 { > interface eth0 { > vif "eth0.xx" { > disable: false > } > vif "eth0.yy" { > disable: false > } > } > interface register_vif { > vif register_vif { > disable: false > } > } > > } > } > > It wouldn't let me commit it. > > > > But if your interface configs are like this > > interfaces { > interface "eth0.xx" { > description: "" > disable: false > discard: false > unreachable: false > management: false > vif "eth0.xx" { > disable: false > address xx.xx.xx.xx { > prefix-length: xx > disable: false > } > } > } > interface "eth0.yy" { > description: "" > disable: false > discard: false > unreachable: false > management: false > vif "eth0.yy" { > disable: false > address yy.yy.yy.yy { > prefix-length: yy > disable: false > } > } > } > } > > > and your plumbing is > > > plumbing { > mfea4 { > disable: false > interface "eth0.xx" { > vif "eth0.xx" { > disable: false > } > } > interface "eth0.yy" { > vif "eth0.yy" { > disable: false > } > } > interface "register_vif" { > vif "register_vif" { > disable: false > } > } > } > } > > > It takes it fine and works. > > > This is on CentOS linux 5.4 with kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 > > > Odd eh? In either case I had let CentOS create the vlans (but not > assign layer 3 addresses) before starting xorp. > > > A post to this list last year from Pavlin Radoslavov was what made me think > to try that. > > > http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-users/2009-February/003032.html > > So I guess it is a known bug. > > E > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100205/c51f392a/attachment.html From aleksandar.cvjetic at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 14:07:54 2010 From: aleksandar.cvjetic at gmail.com (Aleksandar Cvjetic) Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 23:07:54 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] failed commiting changes Message-ID: <249ccfe91002071407u65624827tee2baec1e804d52d@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I'm using SVN version of Xorp and have a problem committing changes. I've configured basic BGP configuration and run commit, but it failed with following message: root at aleks# commit Commit Failed Cannot create module bgp: /usr/local/xorp/lib/xorp/sbin/bgp/xorp_bgp: file does not exist[edit] Ok, i saw there is no bgp directory under sbin at all, but different processes related scripts. I made new "bgp" directory under .../sbin and new file "xorp_bgp" to complete missing part of the path. I suppose there is nothing should be done to "assist" in committing changes, but I just tried with this simple trick. Afterwards, commit failed with following error: root at aleks# commit [ 2010/02/07 22:34:14.719843 ERROR xorpsh:2088 XRL libxipc/xrl_pf_stcp.cc:764 die ] XrlPFSTCPSender died: Keepalive timeout [ 2010/02/07 22:36:45.5079 WARNING xorpsh LIBXORP ] 144 seconds between calls to EventLoop::run [ 2010/02/07 22:36:45.5175 ERROR xorpsh:2088 XRL libxipc/xrl_pf_stcp.cc:405 die ] STCPRequestHandler died: life timer expired It seams that XRL finder failed to find target "bgp": [ 2010/02/07 22:33:47.49927 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:2006 RTRMGR rtrmgr/xrl_rtrmgr_interface.cc:564 apply_config_change_done ] apply_config_change_done: status: 0 response: Can't validate config ready of process bgp target: xorpsh-2088-aleks [ 2010/02/07 22:33:47.50083 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:2006 RTRMGR rtrmgr/xrl_rtrmgr_interface.cc:574 apply_config_change_done ] request failed: >Can't validate config ready of process bgp< [ 2010/02/07 22:33:47.50749 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:2006 RTRMGR rtrmgr/xrl_rtrmgr_interface.cc:601 apply_config_change_done ] Sending config change failed to xorpsh-2088-aleks, error_msg: Can't validate config ready of process bgp Segmentation fault root at aleks:/usr/local/xorp/sbin# What I'm going wrong here? Thank you, Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100207/b0beda0b/attachment.html From gs050486d at student.etf.rs Sun Feb 7 14:10:03 2010 From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=) Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:10:03 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Very beginner question Message-ID: Hi, I'm very beginner in Linux & XORP, so I have a few basic questions. (I have installed XORP on two ways, first like it is shown in Getting started, I have downloaded xorp...tar.gz then i have untared and ungziped it after that i have downloaded make, g++, gcc and libssl-dev and installed it. Next I have typed ./configure in the xorp folder where is file VERSION and after that typed make install instead gmake (because I couldn't link gmake with make). The other way I have installed was with command sudo apt-get install xorp). And here is my command line when I type xorpsh sg at sg-desktop:/$ xorpsh Waiting for xorp_rtrmgr... [ 2010/02/07 22:59:11 ERROR xorpsh:1619 RTRMGR +91 xorpsh_main.cc wait_for_xrl_router_ready ] XrlRouter failed. No Finder? [ 2010/02/07 22:59:11 ERROR xorpsh:1619 RTRMGR +908 xorpsh_main.cc main ] xorpsh exiting due to an init error: Failed to connect to the router manager sg at sg-desktop:/$ uname -a Linux sg-desktop 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux sg at sg-desktop:/$ what should I do next? (I'm using xubuntu under Sun's VirtualBox) Thanks a lot! From adrian.haralambiev at gmail.com Sun Feb 7 23:51:53 2010 From: adrian.haralambiev at gmail.com (Adrian Haralambiev) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 09:51:53 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] Very beginner question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9bb6c3721002072351p59639fccu267330b38834f9df@mail.gmail.com> Hi Stevan, Installing XORP with "sudo apt-get install xorp" is just fine. I'm using Ubuntu 9.10 and xorp works with no problems: #uname -a Linux MyPC 2.6.31-19-generic #56-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 28 02:39:34 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux But, prior to run xorpsh you need to add the user, that is supposed to make reconfigurations, to xorp group! Otherwise the user does not have enough permissions to make configurations. After that run XORP router management process (page 13 in the user_manual - "xorpsh needs to be able to communicate with the XORP router management process xorp rtrmgr using the local file system."). Something like "#sudo xorp_rtrmgr -b YourConfiguration.boot" YourConfiguration.boot could be an empty file!!! but it has to exist. You can create it with "#touch YourConfiguration.boot" And just after that you should be able to run xorpsh. Hope this would help. Regards, Adrian On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Stevan Grbi? 05/0486 < gs050486d at student.etf.rs> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very beginner in Linux & XORP, so I have a few basic questions. > (I have installed XORP on two ways, first like it is shown in Getting > started, I have downloaded xorp...tar.gz then i have untared and ungziped > it after that i have downloaded make, g++, gcc and libssl-dev and installed > it. Next I have typed ./configure in the xorp folder where is file VERSION > and after that typed make install instead gmake (because I couldn't link > gmake with make). The other way I have installed was with command sudo > apt-get install xorp). And here is my command line when I type xorpsh > > sg at sg-desktop:/$ xorpsh > Waiting for xorp_rtrmgr... > [ 2010/02/07 22:59:11 ERROR xorpsh:1619 RTRMGR +91 xorpsh_main.cc > wait_for_xrl_router_ready ] XrlRouter failed. No Finder? > [ 2010/02/07 22:59:11 ERROR xorpsh:1619 RTRMGR +908 xorpsh_main.cc main ] > xorpsh exiting due to an init error: Failed to connect to the router > manager > sg at sg-desktop:/$ uname -a > Linux sg-desktop 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC > 2009 i686 GNU/Linux > sg at sg-desktop:/$ > > what should I do next? (I'm using xubuntu under Sun's VirtualBox) > > Thanks a lot! > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100208/ee701f68/attachment.html From fazlina at sapura.com.my Mon Feb 8 01:20:21 2010 From: fazlina at sapura.com.my (Fazlina Zuria Mohd Anuar) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:20:21 +0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Installing Xorp-1.6 in Fedora-12-x86_64 Message-ID: <001701caa89f$f1eb0c20$d5c12460$@com.my> Hi all, I've tried to install xorp in fedora 12. I can run command ./configure successful but get this error during make command: debug.c:16:2: error: #ident is a deprecated GCC extension can anyone help me?? Regards, Faz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100208/e18dd8fe/attachment.html From adrian.haralambiev at gmail.com Mon Feb 8 02:45:56 2010 From: adrian.haralambiev at gmail.com (Adrian Haralambiev) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:45:56 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] ip igmp static group / ip igmp static join Message-ID: <9bb6c3721002080245k1d4b1226yac84ab03c2e2b458@mail.gmail.com> Dear xorp users, Could you tell me if the current release of xorp supports "ip igmp static group / ip igmp static join" and how to configure it? As far as I understand, without this, xorp could be used as replacement of a switch with IGMP proxy option enabled - correct me if I'm wrong. The reason to ask is that this option could lead to serious reduce of the time needed to switch between channels - the so called ZAP time. Thanks in advance. Regards, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100208/ead7354a/attachment.html From saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com Tue Feb 9 01:42:22 2010 From: saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com (saurabh) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:12:22 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> Message-ID: <000301caa96c$2df60360$280db4c0@elitecore.com> I want to use qungga for multicasting as it is very small Foot-print software as compare to giant size xorp. I wish to use only PIM and IGMP from xorp, as it is not Supported in Qungga. I have following two queries after tried with live CD, 1) Is it possible to only compile PIM and IGMP among the Xorp and then use them as standalone daemons? (As I tried to compiled xorp on fedora.. I saw it generated Very large binaries.. for ex. Xorp_pimv4 size I saw it 2.4 MB After strip it down !!.. and all other binaries are even too big) 2) Regarding multicast test setup: {Below is my setup and results, pls Tell me it is right enough to conclude my pim igmp working?} I have configured two xorp routers (live CDs), on Say R1 and R2 Now both R1 and R2 have two eth interfaces... Device Interface Address R1 le0 11.11.11.2 le1 192.180.13.1 R2 le0 11.11.11.1 le1 9.9.9.1 Now R1 router have its own subnet on le1 , have two nodes N1 and N2 All nodes have only one eth interface (Nodes are windows xp nodes) N1 eth0 192.180.13.25 (Gate way)192.180.13.1 N2 eth0 192.180.13.30 (Gate way)192.180.13.1 And R2 router have its own subnet on its le1 interface , it have one node N3, it is also win-xp node with one eth interface as below N3 eth0 9.9.9.111 (Gate way)9.9.9.1 And I have configured IGMP and PIM for testing of multicast. I am trying to test multicast using VLC player, i.e. generating video stream from N3 and muticasting them on 239.0.0.51 address, and trying to view it on N1 and N2. I can see the stream on N1 and N2 Is my setup for testing IGMP and PIM is sufficient? Please share your ideas hints.... Thanks, Saurabh -----Original Message----- From: Rikkers Jorn [mailto:jorn.rikkers at nl.thalesgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 9:38 PM To: Williams, Mark Cc: saurabh; xorp-users at xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp Hi Saurabh, I've successfully ran such a configuration; PIM and IGMP (XORP) with OSPF (Quagga). Like Mark says you do need the fib2mirib directive in your configuration. Why don't you want to use XORP for unicast routing? Jorn Rikkers On 04-02-2010 16:19, Williams, Mark wrote: > > It works, though it is "not supported." Make sure to use the fib2mrib > directive in your configuration. > > -Mark > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org > [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] *On Behalf Of *saurabh > *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:12 AM > *To:* xorp-users at xorp.org > *Subject:* [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp > > Dear xorp users, > > Is is possible to use only PIM and IGMP functioanlities of xrop > > Among the whole routing platform. I want to use them as seprate > > deamons to run in my system. > > > *As in my system I am using quagga for other unicast routing, and* > > > *I want these (PIM and IGMP for multicast)* > > Can anybudy have any Idea.. Any Hint... > > Thanks, > > Saurabh > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Jorn Rikkers *This message contains Unclassified information* ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender and delete it. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of this email or its attachment(s) is forbidden. Thales Nederland BV will not accept liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachment(s). Thales Nederland BV is seated in Hengelo and is registered at the Chamber of Commerce under number 06061578. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- From globalcouchsurfer at gmail.com Tue Feb 9 09:22:31 2010 From: globalcouchsurfer at gmail.com (CouchSurfer) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:22:31 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] IGMP Query Configuration Message-ID: <2148c4de1002090922r6c0695b1u9bca0649fc309b62@mail.gmail.com> Hi guys, I have an application that want to join multiple groups with the same group address but on different ports (for example 224.0.30.1 : 50001 and 224.0.30.1 : 50002) So in my application I do a simple setsockopt(sockfd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP, (some ip_mreq struct), sizeof(ip_mreq)); However, it seems that IGMP only set subscription request using the ip address but not port number, so I end up receiving both 224.0.30.1 : 50001 and 224.0.30.1 : 50002. Is there any way I can configure xorp so that group membership subscriptions are done as a ip / port combo? Thanks for your help From bms at incunabulum.net Tue Feb 9 10:17:25 2010 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:17:25 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <000301caa96c$2df60360$280db4c0@elitecore.com> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> <000301caa96c$2df60360$280db4c0@elitecore.com> Message-ID: <4B71A6B5.4000104@incunabulum.net> Please reproduce with SVN. From bms at incunabulum.net Tue Feb 9 10:17:56 2010 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:17:56 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] Installing Xorp-1.6 in Fedora-12-x86_64 In-Reply-To: <001701caa89f$f1eb0c20$d5c12460$@com.my> References: <001701caa89f$f1eb0c20$d5c12460$@com.my> Message-ID: <4B71A6D4.9010400@incunabulum.net> Please reproduce with SVN. The Fedora packaging currently lacks a maintainer, and a volunteer is needed. From greearb at candelatech.com Tue Feb 9 10:29:12 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:29:12 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Installing Xorp-1.6 in Fedora-12-x86_64 In-Reply-To: <4B71A6D4.9010400@incunabulum.net> References: <001701caa89f$f1eb0c20$d5c12460$@com.my> <4B71A6D4.9010400@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: <4B71A978.8040402@candelatech.com> On 02/09/2010 10:17 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: > Please reproduce with SVN. > > The Fedora packaging currently lacks a maintainer, and a volunteer is > needed. Last I checked, xorp svn won't compile on F12 because of changes to cpp.... Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From fazlina at sapura.com.my Tue Feb 9 17:31:53 2010 From: fazlina at sapura.com.my (Fazlina Zuria Mohd Anuar) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:31:53 +0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Installing Xorp-1.6 in Fedora-12-x86_64 In-Reply-To: <4B71A978.8040402@candelatech.com> References: <001701caa89f$f1eb0c20$d5c12460$@com.my> <4B71A6D4.9010400@incunabulum.net> <4B71A978.8040402@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <000b01caa9f0$d39e42d0$7adac870$@com.my> Thanks Ben & Bruce. I didn't know how to reproduce it with SVN. -----Original Message----- From: xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] On Behalf Of Ben Greear Sent: 10 February 2010 02:29 To: Bruce Simpson Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] Installing Xorp-1.6 in Fedora-12-x86_64 On 02/09/2010 10:17 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: > Please reproduce with SVN. > > The Fedora packaging currently lacks a maintainer, and a volunteer is > needed. Last I checked, xorp svn won't compile on F12 because of changes to cpp.... Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ Xorp-users mailing list Xorp-users at xorp.org http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2678 - Release Date: 02/09/10 19:35:00 From bms at incunabulum.net Wed Feb 10 07:08:02 2010 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:08:02 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] Installing Xorp-1.6 in Fedora-12-x86_64 In-Reply-To: <000b01caa9f0$d39e42d0$7adac870$@com.my> References: <001701caa89f$f1eb0c20$d5c12460$@com.my> <4B71A6D4.9010400@incunabulum.net> <4B71A978.8040402@candelatech.com> <000b01caa9f0$d39e42d0$7adac870$@com.my> Message-ID: <4B72CBD2.1000406@incunabulum.net> On 02/10/10 01:31, Fazlina Zuria Mohd Anuar wrote: > Thanks Ben& Bruce. > I didn't know how to reproduce it with SVN. Do you have Subversion installed? If so: svn co http://xorp.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xorp/trunk/xorp You should be able to build it with GCC 4.2.1 and SCons 1.2.0 just fine. ... > Last I checked, xorp svn won't compile on F12 because of changes to > cpp.... > > Ben > > Doesn't Fedora have a yum-installable package of a previous compiler version which could be used until the CPP kinks can be worked out? GCC 4.2.1 seems fine as a baseline. FWIW someone(tm) should find time to try Clang, the LLVM native front-end; it looks like it will knock the spots off GCC. From bms at incunabulum.net Wed Feb 10 07:11:18 2010 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:11:18 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <000301caa96c$2df60360$280db4c0@elitecore.com> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> <000301caa96c$2df60360$280db4c0@elitecore.com> Message-ID: <4B72CC96.5080007@incunabulum.net> On 02/09/10 09:42, saurabh wrote: > I want to use qungga for multicasting as it is very small > Foot-print software as compare to giant size xorp. > Not true, XORP is 22MB of binary for a full feature set on 64-bit x86, if you build the SVN version with shared library support and stripped binaries. These are the defaults for the FreeBSD package. We need a volunteer to package XORP for Ubuntu/Fedora/CentOS. > I wish to use only PIM and IGMP from xorp, as it is not > Supported in Qungga. > We don't support this use. It is technically possible, but it's not something that we support or encourage, as we are unable to help with Quagga issues in this forum. > I have following two queries after tried with live CD, > > 1) Is it possible to only compile PIM and IGMP among the > Xorp and then use them as standalone daemons? > Sure, if you hack the SConscripts to only build the required components. > > (As I tried to compiled xorp on fedora.. I saw it generated > Very large binaries.. for ex. Xorp_pimv4 size I saw it 2.4 MB > After strip it down !!.. and all other binaries are even too big) > Are you building with shared library support? From jhay at meraka.org.za Wed Feb 10 07:53:10 2010 From: jhay at meraka.org.za (John Hay) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:53:10 +0200 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp In-Reply-To: <4B72CC96.5080007@incunabulum.net> References: <000001caa5ac$707e16f0$020a0a0a@elitecore.com> <1B62E6082D9F034394DB2FBAC03D1A38835E3AA507@lrccd-exch05.LRCCD.ad.losrios.edu> <4B6AF0F2.7050208@nl.thalesgroup.com> <000301caa96c$2df60360$280db4c0@elitecore.com> <4B72CC96.5080007@incunabulum.net> Message-ID: <20100210155310.GB55392@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 03:11:18PM +0000, Bruce Simpson wrote: > > > I wish to use only PIM and IGMP from xorp, as it is not > > Supported in Qungga. > > > > We don't support this use. It is technically possible, but it's not > something that we support or encourage, as we are unable to help with > Quagga issues in this forum. Do you have a suggestion on what to use then? On FreeBSD I need IPv4 RIP with input and output filters, IPV6 RIP, IPv4 and IPv6 BGP and IPv4 PIM-SM and later for IPv6 too. Up to now I have not been able to find a single package that can do it. That is why we start to try and use bits here and bits there. John -- John Hay -- jhay at meraka.csir.co.za / jhay at FreeBSD.org From ramkumar.ch03 at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 15:05:58 2010 From: ramkumar.ch03 at gmail.com (Ramkumar Cherukuri) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:05:58 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP rpm In-Reply-To: References: <1c56f7b11002101108v5691ab16x360dd07490aacdf@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1c56f7b11002101505k5f58eb50k343f4ce160ac3587@mail.gmail.com> Thank you Pavlin. I downloaded and compiled source from XORP website. --Ram On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Pavlin Radoslavov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Ramkumar Cherukuri > wrote: > > Hi Pavlin, > > I got a question. Does XORP is available as rpm package? Because i need > to > > I don't know. You can search for it in the RPM repositories. > > > install XORP remotely on VINI nodes. Is there any difference in using rpm > > and compile it from source? > > If you find any RPM packages they are done by third parties, so I don't > know > what will be inside. > > > I looking for less memory occupied. Please let me know which one is > best. > > You should use the latest code from SourceForge SVN repository. > It uses shared libraries, and uses less memory than earlier versions. > > Hope that helps, > Pavlin > > > Thank you, > > --Ram > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100210/db8b3b1f/attachment.html From ramkumar.ch03 at gmail.com Wed Feb 10 15:15:47 2010 From: ramkumar.ch03 at gmail.com (Ramkumar Cherukuri) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:15:47 -0600 Subject: [Xorp-users] ./xorp_rtrmgr running problem Message-ID: <1c56f7b11002101515k53b0c9e6r9f6d613b54778375@mail.gmail.com> Hi All, i got a problem with running xorp. I installed xorp.1-6 in a virtual machine. When i run this " ./xorp_rtrmgr -b conf1-interface " command, first time it was working fine. While rtrmgr working fine, i run ./xorpsh command and tried to enter into configure mode. i got error like " you don't have permissions" I was wondering why i got this, i login as root. there is xorp group. Then i stopped both processes and rerun the" ./xorp_rtrmgr -b conf1-interface " command. This time i could not run this command. i keep get back to Linux command prompt. There is no error message. And i check /var/log/message, there is nothing. In the configuration file i put only interface configuration details. What might be the reasons? Please let me know how to rectify this. Thanks, --Ram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100210/8caae26a/attachment.html From mohd.arif at nechclst.in Thu Feb 11 03:17:33 2010 From: mohd.arif at nechclst.in (Mohd Arif) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:47:33 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM-SM Urgent Issue Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303D857D5@mailserver.nechclst.in> Dear XORP users, There is a serious issue observed in PIM-SM operation. ++++++ ++++++ + PC1 + -------------------------------- + PC2 + ++++++ ++++++ PC1 Configuration: C-BSR with priority 10 C-RP for multicast group 239.0.0.0/24 PC2 Configuration: C-BSR with priority 9 C-RP for multicast group 239.0.0.0/24 PROBLEM: The RP-set formed is incomplete. The RP-set doesn't consider PC2 as C-RP. The show pim bootstrap shows following information: PC1 ==== PC1 -> Elected PC2 -> Accept Preferred PC2 ==== PC1 -> Accept Preferred PC2 -> Elected Why PC2 doesn't show PC1 as elected BSR and itself as a candidate BSR? Best Regards, Mohd. Arif DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100211/eb35d813/attachment.html From saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com Fri Feb 12 04:02:13 2010 From: saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com (saurabh) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:32:13 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp Message-ID: <000801caabdb$36581450$1c0ea8c0@elitecore.com> Thanks Bruce, "We don't support this use. It is technically possible, but it's not something that we support or encourage, as we are unable to help with Quagga issues in this forum." Does is mean I need to run also router manafgment services, xorp shell, And FEA service along with the PIM and IGMP as xorp environment services ? Are you building with shared library support? I think I am doing default installation with ./configure and make. Again would anybody guide me about the test setup of PIM and IGMP.. Two routers .. Two hosts with diff subnets , and with VLC player server (streamer) And one stream viewer will serve the purpose ? I want to dig PIM and IGMP. Thanks.. Saurabh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100212/cd022ce9/attachment.html From jfs at computer.org Fri Feb 12 05:43:37 2010 From: jfs at computer.org (Javier Fernandez-Sanguino) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:43:37 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Debian packages for Xorp (was Re: stand alone pim and igmp from xorp) Message-ID: 2010/2/10 Bruce Simpson : > We need a volunteer to package XORP for Ubuntu/Fedora/CentOS. > Why for Ubuntu? Xorp is already packaged for Debian [1] and the same packaging should be good for Ubuntu too. Actually, Ubuntu already provides the (Debian) packages for its distributions. They have not updated their package versions, they will probably automatically do so when they sync with Debian testing. What might actually be useful is to have people helping testing out the Debian packages for Xorp in Debian and contributing there. There are packages available for the latest release (1.6-1) currently available in Jose Calhariz's repository: dget http://web.tagus.ist.utl.pt/~jose.calhariz/xorp_1.6-1.dsc I have to review these and update the 1.6-1~rc2 version currently available in Debian "sid". Regards Javier [1] http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=xorp [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=xorp&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all From mohd.arif at nechclst.in Sat Feb 13 09:18:22 2010 From: mohd.arif at nechclst.in (Mohd Arif) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:48:22 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp References: <000801caabdb$36581450$1c0ea8c0@elitecore.com> Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442301497D92@mailserver.nechclst.in> Hi, XORP implementation of IGMP and PIM can't be used as standalone services. The XORP multicast architecture is such that PIM-SM make use of FEA, MFEA, FIB2RIB, IGMP, RIB modules of XORP. It means the binaries of these modules are mandatory for successful operation of XORP PIM-SM. Following XORP binaries (at least) are required to run PIM successfully: xorp_rtrmgr, xorpsh, xorp_fea, xorp_fib2mrib, xorp_igmp, xorp_pimsm4, xorp_rib, send_cli_processor_xrl, call_xrl, xorp_finder Don't forget to use the template files and xrl files of XORP. As far as test set up of PIM-SM is concerned, I think proper understanding of PIM-SM using it's RFC, may help you to think of a test setup. You can also go through the PIM-SM testsuite provided by XORP. Best Regards, Mohd. Arif ________________________________ From: xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org on behalf of saurabh Sent: Fri 2/12/2010 5:32 PM To: 'saurabh'; xorp-users at xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] stand alone pim and igmp from xorp Thanks Bruce, "We don't support this use. It is technically possible, but it's not something that we support or encourage, as we are unable to help with Quagga issues in this forum." Does is mean I need to run also router manafgment services, xorp shell, And FEA service along with the PIM and IGMP as xorp environment services ? Are you building with shared library support? I think I am doing default installation with ./configure and make... Again would anybody guide me about the test setup of PIM and IGMP.... Two routers .... Two hosts with diff subnets , and with VLC player server (streamer) And one stream viewer will serve the purpose ? I want to dig PIM and IGMP... Thanks.... Saurabh DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100213/d5df3327/attachment.html From mohd.arif at nechclst.in Thu Feb 4 21:27:02 2010 From: mohd.arif at nechclst.in (Mohd Arif) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:57:02 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] [XORP] XORP BUG: reinterpret_cast issue in Big Endian (PPC Architecture) Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303D034F0@mailserver.nechclst.in> Dear All, I have successfully built the package for PPC architecture. On running the PPC compiled package on board, There is a severe effect on PIM-SM functionality. Issue ==== a) When I configure a router as static RP in my router card with any priority value say 100 or default (192), the command "show pim rps" is always showing priority as zero for that static RP irrespective of value specified through xorpsh. b) The same problem is occurring in case of Candidate-BSR priority & Candidate-RP priority & holdtime. Bootstrap message is showing priority as zero & Cand-RP Adv message showing RP priority & hold time as zero. Reason of Issue ============ When I searched through the code, I found that at a place there was a conversion going from uint32_t to uint8_t (reinterpret operator) for all above mentioned values. I applied debug message before & after this conversion and found that this conversion was returning 0 all the time..... However this problem didn't occurred when I tested XORP on PC. The problem is the difference in Endianness of Intel PC and PPC Architecture. Intel PC is little endian whereas PPC is big endian. For proper understanding I am attaching an image, clearly specifying this problem. My whole project has got stuck so please help me out.....Any help is appreciable. Best Regards, Mohd. Arif DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100205/b056d533/attachment-0001.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xorp_src_snapshot.JPG Type: image/jpeg Size: 97503 bytes Desc: xorp_src_snapshot.JPG Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100205/b056d533/attachment-0001.jpe From bhughes at totalrecallcorp.com Mon Feb 15 11:06:34 2010 From: bhughes at totalrecallcorp.com (Bernard J Hughes) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM-SM first time Message-ID: <1266260794.31226.234.camel@laptop.trc> I am trying to configure a multicast router. Xorp has been fine up until I add protocol pimsm4. I am using the getting started page from xorp.org as a reference. Below is a snippet of errors present in the log after failing to start the service. I am only using IPv4 and therefore only included IPv4 statements in the xorp.conf file. Any ideas on why it might be failing? Thanks in advance! [ 2010/02/15 13:34:40 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface added: Vif[em0] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 [ 2010/02/15 13:34:40 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface added: Vif[gre0] pif_index: 5 vif_index: 1 Flags: P2P MULTICAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1476 [ 2010/02/15 13:34:40 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface added: Vif[rl0] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 2 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface enabled: Vif[rl0] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 2 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv6 ENABLED [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 ERROR xorp_mld:11792 MLD6IGMP +1095 mld6igmp_node.cc start_vif ] Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 WARNING xorp_mld XrlMld6igmpTarget ] Handling method for mld6igmp/0.1/start_vif failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:11728 RTRMGR +691 master_conf_tree.cc commit_pass2_done ] Commit failed: 102 Command failed Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:11728 RTRMGR +261 master_conf_tree.cc config_done ] Configuration failed: 102 Command failed Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:11728 RTRMGR +2233 task.cc run_task ] No more tasks to run From bhughes at totalrecallcorp.com Mon Feb 15 12:25:43 2010 From: bhughes at totalrecallcorp.com (Bernard J Hughes) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM-SM first time In-Reply-To: <1266260794.31226.234.camel@laptop.trc> References: <1266260794.31226.234.camel@laptop.trc> Message-ID: <1266265543.31226.236.camel@laptop.trc> I figured out my problem. I was including configurations for mld which is specific to IPv6. Once I excluded those lines xorp started fine! :-) On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:06 -0500, Bernard J Hughes wrote: > I am trying to configure a multicast router. Xorp has been fine up > until I add protocol pimsm4. I am using the getting started page from > xorp.org as a reference. Below is a snippet of errors present in the > log after failing to start the service. I am only using IPv4 and > therefore only included IPv4 statements in the xorp.conf file. Any > ideas on why it might be failing? Thanks in advance! > > > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:40 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface added: Vif[em0] > pif_index: 1 vif_index: 0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP > MTU: 1500 > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:40 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface added: > Vif[gre0] pif_index: 5 vif_index: 1 Flags: P2P MULTICAST > UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1476 > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:40 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface added: Vif[rl0] > pif_index: 2 vif_index: 2 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP > MTU: 1500 > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 INFO xorp_mld MLD6IGMP ] Interface enabled: > Vif[rl0] pif_index: 2 vif_index: 2 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST > UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv6 ENABLED > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 ERROR xorp_mld:11792 MLD6IGMP +1095 > mld6igmp_node.cc start_vif ] Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary > address > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 WARNING xorp_mld XrlMld6igmpTarget ] Handling > method for mld6igmp/0.1/start_vif failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed > Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:11728 RTRMGR +691 > master_conf_tree.cc commit_pass2_done ] Commit failed: 102 Command > failed Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:11728 RTRMGR +261 > master_conf_tree.cc config_done ] Configuration failed: 102 Command > failed Cannot start vif rl0: invalid primary address > [ 2010/02/15 13:34:41 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:11728 RTRMGR +2233 task.cc > run_task ] No more tasks to run > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From gs050486d at student.etf.rs Mon Feb 15 14:51:25 2010 From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:51:25 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] RIP standard configuration problem Message-ID: <7376727b0759ba259b4fc95ad0891a0c@student.etf.rs> Hi to all, I'm having very basic problem with standard rip configuration, i.e. I have used configuration form this post http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-users/2007-March/001724.html anyhow I can't ping lo0 form another router, i.e. routers aren't exchanging routes over rip. I'm using LiveCD 1.6 running on Sun's VirtualBox 3.14, with bridged adapters. I tried to test rip with two PC also with live cds and same configuration but again I hadn't route to host (when tried to ping lo0 form another router). In both cases I can ping le0 from another router and rip status is enabled for each router's interface(lo0 and le0). In rip statistics first three rows are non zero for both routers.. Thanks a lot! p.s. If someone who is also using Sun's VirtualBox can point me which network adapters is using..? From gs050486d at student.etf.rs Mon Feb 15 15:29:21 2010 From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:29:21 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] RIP standard configuration problem In-Reply-To: <808187191-1266275598-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-909763832-@bda549.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <7376727b0759ba259b4fc95ad0891a0c@student.etf.rs> <808187191-1266275598-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-909763832-@bda549.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: <4402aa73fc061fe5f15d58959fa3dae0@student.etf.rs> First of all thanks for quick answer, I don't know how to run tcpdump with LiveCD (I mean is it possible with LiveCD?) Which ifconfig, haven't found that part anywhere? On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:13:17 +0000, "Bernie Hughes" wrote: > You should include your configuration and the output of ifconfig. Have > you tried using tcpdump to view interface traffic which was recommended at > the end of the post? > > VirtualBox can use adapters in different ways. You should be using bridged > mode if you are planning on using xorp inside Vbox. > Bernie Hughes > Total Recall Corporation > 17 Washington Avenue > Suffern, NY 10901 > 800-659-7793 > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stevan Grbi 05/0486 gs050486d at student.etf.rs > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:51:25 > To: > Subject: [Xorp-users] RIP standard configuration problem > > Hi to all, > > I'm having very basic problem with standard rip configuration, i.e. I have > used configuration form this post > http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/xorp-users/2007-March/001724.html > anyhow I can't ping lo0 form another router, i.e. routers aren't > exchanging routes over rip. I'm using LiveCD 1.6 running on Sun's > VirtualBox 3.14, with bridged adapters. I tried to test rip with two PC > also with live cds and same configuration but again I hadn't route to host > (when tried to ping lo0 form another router). In both cases I can ping le0 > from another router and rip status is enabled for each router's > interface(lo0 and le0). In rip statistics first three rows are non zero for > both routers.. > > Thanks a lot! > > p.s. If someone who is also using Sun's VirtualBox can point me which > network adapters is using..? > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users From gs050486d at student.etf.rs Tue Feb 16 07:34:35 2010 From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:34:35 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] RIP with LiveCD Message-ID: <040dfb370e53c28ef8963992e804eae5@student.etf.rs> Hi all, I'm trying to test rip with LiveCD (I'm running this tests with Sun's VirtualBox and two virtual machines booting with LiveCD with bridged interface each). I have red few post with rip problems,beside using given configuration for xorp, I don't know how should my kernel routing table look like, and which addresses should I add?! My kernel routing table (after booting, before entering into xorpsh),loged in as a root, after netstat -rn: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 138293 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif ::1 ::1 and so on and after ifconfig: le0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether mac address... media: Ethernet autoselect status: active enc0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1536 (this interface I wasn't enabled during XORP starting up) lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Hope this would be helpful. I'm trying to run basic rip test, to ping form one XORP router loopback on another router, as I wrote in previous post. Thanks a lot! SG From bms at incunabulum.net Sun Feb 21 11:06:33 2010 From: bms at incunabulum.net (Bruce Simpson) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:06:33 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] Debian packages for Xorp (was Re: stand alone pim and igmp from xorp) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B818439.5000506@incunabulum.net> On 12/02/2010 13:43, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > Why for Ubuntu? Xorp is already packaged for Debian [1] and the same > packaging should be good for Ubuntu too. Actually, Ubuntu already > provides the (Debian) packages for its distributions. They have not > updated their package versions, they will probably automatically do so > when they sync with Debian testing. > > What might actually be useful is to have people helping testing out > the Debian packages for Xorp in Debian and contributing there. There > are packages available for the latest release (1.6-1) currently > available in Jose Calhariz's repository: > dget http://web.tagus.ist.utl.pt/~jose.calhariz/xorp_1.6-1.dsc > I should have been less circumspect in my message, and said that what is really needed is more testing of XORP SVN on these platforms. The 1.6 release is quite far from the SVN trunk, and many changes, mostly to deployment, and bug fixes, were made on that branch. In XORP traditionally tags rather than release branches have been used, this mostly reflects the fact that we were using CVS up until some of the code went behind the corporate firewall. Unfortunately, development is unlikely to progress further, until we can get more testing from the user base; this is chicken and egg. I would hope Linux distribution package maintainers could follow suit with what was done for the FreeBSD xorp-devel package, it packages a specific SVN revision for deployment on FreeBSD systems. The reason I mention Ubuntu is because it would be beneficial for the XORP Project to have XORP readily available to Ubuntu users, without necessarily having to configure additional package servers, etc. thanks, BMS From mdjernaes at pulz8.com Sun Feb 21 23:07:57 2010 From: mdjernaes at pulz8.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Djern=C3=A6s?=) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:07:57 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Altering config on the fly Message-ID: Hi, I've been looking quite a bit on how to make xorp version 1.6 "do what I need to do", but one of the things I need to accommodate is the ability to have tunnel interfaces "come and go" while in action. This means that when xorp starts up I can not provide the complete config and/or the underlying interfaces won't exist when it is started. Are there any tool to push interface configuration for PIM-SM into a running xorp? On a side note I've noticed that if I start up an xorp instance with a configuration "mirroring" the actual config on my system (Linux) it will remove the addresses and add them again to the interface (causing existing static routes to be removed) .. 'default-system-config' seems to avoid this, but it still is a problem as there the issue with vlans ... is there a way to prevent this "del/add" action by xorp? Martin From gtamboise at gmail.com Mon Feb 22 01:10:17 2010 From: gtamboise at gmail.com (Guillaume Tamboise) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:10:17 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] ospf4 / putting several IP aliases in OSPF networks Message-ID: <8245a2861002220110y1f8dc121j7874f842b7a6eeab@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I read in the user manual (page 93) that "OSPFv2 supports a single address per interface/vif, therefore all parameters are set below the address node.". Does it mean that I cannot start several OSPF adjacencies from a Linux network interface that has IP aliases (or secondary IP addresses as several vendors call them)? I am talking about Linux IP interfaces that look like this: # ip addr show dev eth0 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 54:52:00:67:af:9a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet *10.0.1.1/24* brd 10.0.12.255 scope global eth0 inet *10.0.2.1/24* scope global eth0 [...] I would like to start adjacencies from both 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1. Is that supported? Best Regards, Guillaume Tamboise -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100222/96ffe588/attachment.html From greearb at candelatech.com Mon Feb 22 09:41:09 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:41:09 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Altering config on the fly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> On 02/21/2010 11:07 PM, Martin Djern?s wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking quite a bit on how to make xorp version 1.6 "do what > I need to do", but one of the things I need to accommodate is the > ability to have tunnel interfaces "come and go" while in action. > > This means that when xorp starts up I can not provide the complete > config and/or the underlying interfaces won't exist when it is > started. > > Are there any tool to push interface configuration for PIM-SM into a > running xorp? I put a lot of fixes into my xorp tree to address these issues. You can add/delete interfaces via xorpsh, and my xorp also handles interfaces disappearing out from under it better. Likely some issues still exist, so bug reports are welcome: http://www.candelatech.com/oss/xorp-ct.html > On a side note I've noticed that if I start up an xorp instance with a > configuration "mirroring" the actual config on my system (Linux) it > will remove the addresses and add them again to the interface (causing > existing static routes to be removed) .. 'default-system-config' seems > to avoid this, but it still is a problem as there the issue with vlans > ... is there a way to prevent this "del/add" action by xorp? Not so sure about this one... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From greearb at candelatech.com Mon Feb 22 09:42:13 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:42:13 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] ospf4 / putting several IP aliases in OSPF networks In-Reply-To: <8245a2861002220110y1f8dc121j7874f842b7a6eeab@mail.gmail.com> References: <8245a2861002220110y1f8dc121j7874f842b7a6eeab@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B82C1F5.9030403@candelatech.com> On 02/22/2010 01:10 AM, Guillaume Tamboise wrote: > Hello, > > I read in the user manual (page 93) that "OSPFv2 supports a single > address per interface/vif, therefore all parameters are set below the > address node.". > > Does it mean that I cannot start several OSPF adjacencies from a Linux > network interface that has IP aliases (or secondary IP addresses as > several vendors call them)? > > I am talking about Linux IP interfaces that look like this: > > # ip addr show dev eth0 > 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 > link/ether 54:52:00:67:af:9a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet *10.0.1.1/24 * brd 10.0.12.255 scope > global eth0 > inet *10.0.2.1/24 * scope global eth0 > [...] > > > I would like to start adjacencies from both 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1. > Is that supported? You might be able to use mac-vlans on modern Linux kernels to achieve this. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From Nitin.Choudhary at nechclst.in Mon Feb 22 20:26:44 2010 From: Nitin.Choudhary at nechclst.in (Nitin Choudhary) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:56:44 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] IP address change References: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303E06634@mailserver.nechclst.in> Hi guys..... Please help me out. I am in a big trouble. My problem is that whenever I change the IP Address of a PIM-SM configured interface, PIM-SM module crashes abnormally which id not desirable in any case. However there is no problem when interface is disabled in XORP.Is this a bug or is normal XORP behavior. Any kind of help is appreciable.. DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From mdjernaes at pulz8.com Mon Feb 22 23:43:30 2010 From: mdjernaes at pulz8.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Djern=C3=A6s?=) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:43:30 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Altering config on the fly In-Reply-To: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> References: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> Message-ID: Hi Ben, Thank you for your response to my inquiry. On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 02/21/2010 11:07 PM, Martin Djern?s wrote: >> I've been looking quite a bit on how to make xorp version 1.6 "do what >> I need to do", but one of the things I need to accommodate is the >> ability to have tunnel interfaces "come and go" while in action. >> >> This means that when xorp starts up I can not provide the complete >> config and/or the underlying interfaces won't exist when it is >> started. >> >> Are there any tool to push interface configuration for PIM-SM into a >> running xorp? > > I put a lot of fixes into my xorp tree to address these issues. Is yours based on trunk or 1.6? I think it looks like it is based on trunk .. how stable is this compared to 1.6? > You can add/delete interfaces via xorpsh, and my xorp also handles > interfaces disappearing out from under it better. I've seen at least one problem where pim seems to "hang" very long when the interface has disappeared underneath it - so this would for sure be good. In terms of xorpsh this can not really be used programmatically as far as I can see - have I misunderstood it. I have tunnels coming and going and I would need to adjust the multicast/PIM code to utilize these so xorop will start to utilize them. Why are your changes not in the officially xorp three? Martin From greearb at candelatech.com Tue Feb 23 08:54:32 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:54:32 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Altering config on the fly In-Reply-To: References: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <4B840848.6040803@candelatech.com> On 02/22/2010 11:43 PM, Martin Djern?s wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thank you for your response to my inquiry. > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >> On 02/21/2010 11:07 PM, Martin Djern?s wrote: >>> I've been looking quite a bit on how to make xorp version 1.6 "do what >>> I need to do", but one of the things I need to accommodate is the >>> ability to have tunnel interfaces "come and go" while in action. >>> >>> This means that when xorp starts up I can not provide the complete >>> config and/or the underlying interfaces won't exist when it is >>> started. >>> >>> Are there any tool to push interface configuration for PIM-SM into a >>> running xorp? >> >> I put a lot of fixes into my xorp tree to address these issues. > > Is yours based on trunk or 1.6? I think it looks like it is based on > trunk .. how stable is this compared to 1.6? It's based on trunk. It seems at least as stable as 1.6. We use our xorp tree in our product so it gets a decent bit of testing for many of the protocols (primarily, PIM, OSPFv2, OSPFv6). > >> You can add/delete interfaces via xorpsh, and my xorp also handles >> interfaces disappearing out from under it better. > > I've seen at least one problem where pim seems to "hang" very long > when the interface has disappeared underneath it - so this would for > sure be good. I am especially interested in PIM and OSPF bugs should you find any in my tree. I have a pretty good understanding of that code, so I can probably fix them if you find any... > In terms of xorpsh this can not really be used programmatically as far > as I can see - have I misunderstood it. I have tunnels coming and > going and I would need to adjust the multicast/PIM code to utilize > these so xorop will start to utilize them. We fork off scripts to call xorpsh from our main controller program. I've improved the xorpsh executing time so that it's normally 200ms or so, instead of multiple seconds on the main trunk. It is slightly tricky to do the right xorpsh commands...normally I remove old config, commit, add new config, commit, for example. You can pass multiple cmds to xorpsh with the -c option. > > Why are your changes not in the officially xorp three? It's not my decision. The best I can do at this time is offer my own tree. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From greearb at candelatech.com Tue Feb 23 08:57:37 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:57:37 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] IP address change In-Reply-To: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303E06634@mailserver.nechclst.in> References: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303E06634@mailserver.nechclst.in> Message-ID: <4B840901.8080407@candelatech.com> On 02/22/2010 08:26 PM, Nitin Choudhary wrote: > Hi guys..... > Please help me out. I am in a big trouble. > My problem is that whenever I change the IP Address of a PIM-SM > configured interface, PIM-SM module crashes abnormally which id not > desirable in any case. However there is no problem when interface is > disabled in XORP.Is this a bug or is normal XORP behavior. > Any kind of help is appreciable.. It should never crash. If you can reproduce on my tree: http://www.candelatech.com/oss/xorp-ct.html Post the log file and gdb backtrace from the core file and I'll do my best to fix it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From Nitin.Choudhary at nechclst.in Tue Feb 23 19:39:08 2010 From: Nitin.Choudhary at nechclst.in (Nitin Choudhary) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:09:08 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] IP address change References: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303E06634@mailserver.nechclst.in> <4B840901.8080407@candelatech.com> Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303E06A56@mailserver.nechclst.in> Hi Ben, Thank god, you replied... Since I am using official xorp 1.6 package so I am sending you log file of the same . Meanwhile I am trying to reproduce same problem in your code and will send you the data when done. Thanks once again dude... Log : [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 INFO xorp_igmp MLD6IGMP ] Deleted address on interface eth0: addr: 10.248.4.1 subnet: 10.248.4.0/29 broadcast: 10.248.4.7 peer: 0.0.0.0 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 ERROR xorp_igmp:29507 MLD6IGMP +1003 ../../mld6igmp/mld6igmp_node.cc delete_vif_addr ] Error updating primary address for vif eth0: invalid primary address [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 TRACE xorp_pimsm4 PIM ] TX PIM_HELLO from 10.248.4.1 to 224.0.0.13 on vif eth0 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 INFO xorp_pimsm4 PIM ] Deleted address on interface eth0: addr: 10.248.4.1 subnet: 10.248.4.0/29 broadcast: 10.248.4.7 peer: 0.0.0.0 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 ERROR xorp_pimsm4:29629 PIM +1109 pim_node.cc delete_vif_addr ] Error updating primary and domain-wide addresses for vif eth0: invalid primary address [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 TRACE xorp_pimsm4 PIM ] TX PIM_HELLO from 0.0.0.0 to 224.0.0.13 on vif eth0 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 INFO xorp_pimsm4 PIM ] Interface stopped: Vif[eth0] pif_index: 1 vif_index: 0 Flags: MULTICAST BROADCAST UNDERLYING_VIF_UP MTU: 1500 DOWN IPv4 ENABLED [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 WARNING xorp_igmp XrlMld6igmpTarget ] Handling method for mld6igmp/0.1/delete_protocol4 failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Cannot delete protocol instance 'PIMSM_4' on vif eth0 with vif_index 0 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 FATAL xorp_pimsm4:29629 PIM +2217 xrl_pim_node.cc mld6igmp_client_send_add_delete_protocol_mld6igmp_cb ] Cannot deregister with the MLD6IGMP: 102 Command failed Cannot delete protocol instance 'PIMSM_4' on vif eth0 with vif_index 0 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 ERROR xorp_rtrmgr:28468 RTRMGR +754 ../../rtrmgr/module_manager.cc done_cb ] Command "/usr/local/xorp/pim/xorp_pimsm4": terminated with signal 6. [ 2010/02/24 03:37:10 INFO xorp_rtrmgr:28468 RTR +299 ../../rtrmgr/module_manager.cc module_exited ] Module abnormally killed: pimsm4 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 INFO xorp_fea XRL ] Sender died (protocol = "stcp", address = "127.0.0.1:50930") [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 ERROR xorp_fea:28485 LIBXORP +226 ../../libxorp/buffered_asyncio.cc io_event ] read error 111 [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 ERROR xorp_fea:28485 XRL +869 ../../libxipc/xrl_pf_stcp.cc read_event ] Read failed (error = 111) [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 ERROR xorp_fea:28485 XRL +720 ../../libxipc/xrl_pf_stcp.cc die ] XrlPFSTCPSender died: read error [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 INFO xorp_fea LIBFEACLIENT ] An error occurred sending an Xrl to "ifmgr_mirror-cfacb834dd81402d00084859f0c3bfdb at 127.0.0.1". Target is being removed from list of interface update receivers. [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 WARNING xorp_rtrmgr:28468 XrlFinderTarget +407 ../../xrl/targets/finder_base.cc handle_finder_0_2_resolve_xrl ] Handling method for finder/0.2/resolve_xrl failed: XrlCmdError 102 Command failed Target "PIMSM_4" does not exist or is not enabled. [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 ERROR xorp_rib:29299 RIB +859 ../../rib/redist_xrl.cc dispatch_complete ] Fatal error during start transaction: 201 Resolve failed [ 2010/02/24 03:37:11 WARNING xorp_fea FEA ] proto_socket_read() failed: RX packet from 10.248.4.1 to 224.0.0.2 pif_index 26: no vif found Waiting for reply ........ -----Original Message----- From: Ben Greear [mailto:greearb at candelatech.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:28 PM To: Nitin Choudhary Cc: xorp-users at xorp.org Subject: Re: [Xorp-users] IP address change On 02/22/2010 08:26 PM, Nitin Choudhary wrote: > Hi guys..... > Please help me out. I am in a big trouble. > My problem is that whenever I change the IP Address of a PIM-SM > configured interface, PIM-SM module crashes abnormally which id not > desirable in any case. However there is no problem when interface is > disabled in XORP.Is this a bug or is normal XORP behavior. > Any kind of help is appreciable.. It should never crash. If you can reproduce on my tree: http://www.candelatech.com/oss/xorp-ct.html Post the log file and gdb backtrace from the core file and I'll do my best to fix it. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100224/ca35565f/attachment.html From mdjernaes at pulz8.com Tue Feb 23 23:39:09 2010 From: mdjernaes at pulz8.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Djern=C3=A6s?=) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:39:09 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Altering config on the fly In-Reply-To: <4B840848.6040803@candelatech.com> References: <4B82C1B5.5000702@candelatech.com> <4B840848.6040803@candelatech.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >> Is yours based on trunk or 1.6? I think it looks like it is based on >> trunk .. how stable is this compared to 1.6? > > It's based on trunk. ?It seems at least as stable as 1.6. ?We use > our xorp tree in our product so it gets a decent bit of testing for > many of the protocols (primarily, PIM, OSPFv2, OSPFv6). Good to know. >> In terms of xorpsh this can not really be used programmatically as far >> as I can see - have I misunderstood it. I have tunnels coming and >> going and I would need to adjust the multicast/PIM ?code to utilize >> these so xorop will start to utilize them. > > We fork off scripts to call xorpsh from our main controller program. > I've improved the xorpsh executing time so that it's normally 200ms or > so, instead of multiple seconds on the main trunk. ?It is slightly tricky > to do the right xorpsh commands...normally I remove old config, commit, add > new config, commit, > for example. ?You can pass multiple cmds to xorpsh with the -c option. Thanks. I'll look at that. >> Why are your changes not in the officially xorp three? > > It's not my decision. ?The best I can do at this time is offer my own tree. Guess so, was just wondering. Martin From steweg at ynet.sk Wed Feb 24 01:09:40 2010 From: steweg at ynet.sk (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A9tefan_Gula?=) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:09:40 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] kernel msg "mroute: pending queue full, dropping entries." Message-ID: Hi, I am currently also receiving that message. I am not sure what cause this problem but I am sure it is done byt XORP. I am running five XORP instances with more than 3000 users behind them so it is really problematic to find out what can cause this. fw1 mld6igmp # netstat -alnp | grep raw raw 109500 0 0.0.0.0:2 0.0.0.0:* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw 0 0 0.0.0.0:2 0.0.0.0:* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw 109340 0 0.0.0.0:89 0.0.0.0:* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw 0 0 0.0.0.0:89 0.0.0.0:* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw 109508 0 0.0.0.0:103 0.0.0.0:* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw 0 0 0.0.0.0:103 0.0.0.0:* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw6 109276 0 :::89 :::* 7 20285/xorp_fea raw6 0 0 :::89 :::* 7 20285/xorp_fea According to output above, there is relatively enough packets in queues. I have found on other multicast implementation the same bug and it was fixed by simply periodical reading from given sockets (http://www.cschill.de/smcroute/) and discarding the packets. I was trying to create a patch but as I am not familiar with XORP code, its really problematic to find out. Any ideas how to fix it? kernel version: 2.6.25-hardened-r9 XORP version: 1.6 -- Stefan Gula CCNP, CCIP From gs050486d at student.etf.rs Wed Feb 24 10:36:16 2010 From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:36:16 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] rip & ospf issues with LiveCD Message-ID: <9ff3c6a539161aa56d61f049608ca159@student.etf.rs> Hi everyone, does anyone has issues trying to ping other loopback, with two rip/ospf routers, running on LiveCd?! Could it be impossible with LiveCd? Thanks a lot. SG From bandido at secure.hk.com Wed Feb 24 13:30:05 2010 From: bandido at secure.hk.com (maren) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:30:05 +0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Xorp Registering using PIM RP server. Message-ID: <4B859A5D.4080804@secure.hk.com> Hello, I am currently evaluating xorp to receive a multicast on a server. I need to receive an multicast feed from a network a server is connected to using PIM SM. I don't need this server to do a further rooting or offer any Cand RP or anything. On my side I don't have a Cisco router which I can use to register with the RP so I am trying to use a Linux box using some PIM SM implementation to handle all the job by itself. The machine has 4 ethernet ports. One is connected to a partners network/router and I can see from having run USC pimd that it is PIM enabled. Using the application that process the data multicast, I have been able to join multicast groups but not received any data as USC pimd does not have any "RP Register functions. I am also running BGP with the peer router which allows me to see the routing to their RP server. The RP server needs to receive requests from a network IP block which has been allocated to me, so a 2nd ethernet port is used for that. Can xorp do this? I can't see anywhere it can do any RP registration anywhere. If I am greatly misunderstanding how pim works I apologise. Prior to 2 days ago I had never seen this protocol. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Regads, Bob From greearb at candelatech.com Wed Feb 24 13:43:50 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:43:50 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] Xorp Registering using PIM RP server. In-Reply-To: <4B859A5D.4080804@secure.hk.com> References: <4B859A5D.4080804@secure.hk.com> Message-ID: <4B859D96.1060507@candelatech.com> On 02/24/2010 01:30 PM, maren wrote: > Hello, > I am currently evaluating xorp to receive a multicast on a > server. I need to receive an multicast feed from a network a server is > connected to using PIM SM. I don't need this server to do a further > rooting or offer any Cand RP or anything. > > On my side I don't have a Cisco router which I can use to register with > the RP so I am trying to use a Linux box using some PIM SM > implementation to handle all the job by itself. > > > The machine has 4 ethernet ports. One is connected to a partners > network/router and I can see from having run USC pimd that it is PIM > enabled. Using the application that process the data multicast, I have > been able to join multicast groups but not received any data as USC pimd > does not have any "RP Register functions. I am also running BGP with the > peer router which allows me to see the routing to their RP server. > > The RP server needs to receive requests from a network IP block which > has been allocated to me, so a 2nd ethernet port is used for that. > > Can xorp do this? I can't see anywhere it can do any RP registration > anywhere. > > If I am greatly misunderstanding how pim works I apologise. Prior to 2 > days ago I had never seen this protocol. > > Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. If you just want to receive multicast, I think you'll need to write a user-space app that opens the proper multicast socket, and reads pkts, etc. I don't think you need xorp for this at all. Thanks, Ben > > Regads, > Bob > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From bandido at secure.hk.com Thu Feb 25 07:47:52 2010 From: bandido at secure.hk.com (bandido at secure.hk.com) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:47:52 +0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] PIM-SM/multicast - US$500 to who ever helps me getting it working Message-ID: Sorry if this is not the right way of doing things but honestly I am desperate. I have tried everything else and not had a chance to get xorp configured and would prefer the help of someone experienced. In my email yesterday I described the environnement. The Goal: The server has 2 ethernet ports, one that is connected to an external network and the other ethernet port is internal to my network. I only need to run an application on this server which binds to the internet port of my machine and uses PIM-SM to register with a RP server and get the multicast feed. So far I can get the groups this network offers but I can't get the feed being sent in. If anyone is interested let me know and I will send you the network diagram. Regards, Bob PS. I will pay with Paypal or T/T transfer. From john.tavs at xorp.net Thu Feb 25 10:00:25 2010 From: john.tavs at xorp.net (John Tavs) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:00:25 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP Asset Sales Notification Message-ID: With profound regrets, the board of XORP Inc. has vote to shut down the company and put the assets of XORP up for sale. The asset of XORP have been broken into 3 packages that are being sold. ? XORP: The rights to the XORP Open Source purchase from ICSI and its derivative works from XORP employees and contractors as posted on the XORP project web site (currently located at http://sourceforge.net/projects/xorp/). Note, while the project is maintained as an Open Source Project under GPL license terms on sourceforge, the owner of this asset will have rights to create additional licensing terms. ? Netstack: The rights of the port of the XORP code to the Broadcom Switching Platform using proprietary Broadcom SDK (www.broadcom.com) including XORP developed Layer 2 functionality (or ?Netstack?). ? Appstack: The rights to the HTTP load balancing application that XORP has developed for data centers. If you are interested in participating in this auction and, please contact David Johnson at Sherword Partners ( DJohnson at shrwood.com ) before the auction closes on March 19, 2010. Regards, John Tavs -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100225/bad031b9/attachment.html From greearb at candelatech.com Thu Feb 25 11:16:35 2010 From: greearb at candelatech.com (Ben Greear) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:16:35 -0800 Subject: [Xorp-users] [Xorp-hackers] XORP Asset Sales Notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B86CC93.2010204@candelatech.com> On 02/25/2010 10:00 AM, John Tavs wrote: > With profound regrets, the board of XORP Inc. has vote to shut down the > company and put the assets of XORP up for sale. I'm sorry to hear this! My best wishes go out to all of the XORP Inc folks. And, I am very grateful that you all chose to put xorp under the GPL so that the project can live on in one form or another! Sincerely, Ben Greear -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com From saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com Fri Feb 26 03:58:18 2010 From: saurabh.pandya at elitecore.com (saurabh) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:28:18 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] Help : Test setup for Pim4 and IGMP between sunets (for VLC source and Receiver ) multicast test. Message-ID: <000301cab6da$fd9fbb30$1c0ea8c0@elitecore.com> Dear Xorp users, "I think many of other xorp users must passed this stage, at where I am struggling right now" I am struggling to make the test setup of pim and igmp (after going thru manuals and rfcs) Aim is to see multicast traffic in VLC player at PC1 which is coming from PC2 (multicast source for 224.0.0.4) ,Off course through PIM and IGMP. (I should see proper join & prune at both routers) I have two pc(win-xp), (At diff subnets) two routers (both run Xorp live cd). With 2nd XP pc2, I am multicasting stream at 224.0.0.4 group..udp(port 1234).. And @ 1st xp pc1, I am trying to view the video stream. Both Pcs are behind different xorp (live cd) router as shown in figure below.. PC1 -xp PC2 -xp 193.193.193.111 194.194.194.111 eth(0) (eth0) | | | | le1 193.193.193.1 le1 194.194.194.1 (pim-RP) (DR) le0 195.195.195.20 le0 195.195.195.10 XORP-CD-Router1 ---- XORP-CD-Router2 (bsd naming are le0..1 ..instead of eth0.1..) IGMP activity is happening: (:-)) What I observed is that PC1's vlc client is joining 224.0.0.4 group, when I start to Play button of vlc, I can see it by "show igmp group" command at router1's cli, No PIM activity is happening: (:-() I noted that router1 is not sending pim join (*,G) to router2 for group 224.0.0.4 (Which should be as I have defined router1's le0 as RP for group 224.0.0.4/8) Only I can see pim neighbors while trying command ("show pim neighbors"), in both routers , in that case router1 is being shown as NOT DR, and router2 as DR And I have also noted that multicast traffic that is coming at le1 in router2, (from PC2-which is multicast source) that is not forwarded to le0. (I think which should be, as it must go to RP interface which is le0 of router2) ! Plese help me, what I missing something? I have configured fib2mrib.. And not configured any other unicast protocols. (Is this correct) I have also not set default gateway (default routes in any routers) I think "Mohd" and other users have done this setup that I saw from sep-oct-2009 mailing list? Plese share your exp. for pim igmp setup.. config are below,,,, Thanks, Saurabh config file for router2 i given here in last, in router1 config only change in interface address, remaining all are same **************************************************** root at xorpcd.local# show protocols { fib2mrib { } igmp { interface le0 { vif le0 { } } interface le1 { vif le1 { } } } pimsm4 { interface le0 { vif le0 { dr-priority: 250 } } interface le1 { vif le1 { } } interface "register_vif" { vif "register_vif" { } } static-rps { rp 195.195.195.10 { group-prefix 224.0.0.0/8 { rp-priority: 250 } } } switch-to-spt-threshold { interval: 10 bytes: 1000000 } } } fea { unicast-forwarding4 { } } interfaces { interface le0 { description: "Ethernet" vif le0 { address 195.195.195.10 { prefix-length: 24 } } } interface le1 { description: "Ethernet" vif le1 { address 194.194.194.1 { prefix-length: 24 } } } interface lo0 { description: "Loopback interface" vif lo0 { } } } plumbing { mfea4 { interface le0 { vif le0 { } } interface le1 { vif le1 { } } interface "register_vif" { vif "register_vif" { } } } } -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100226/5b0b8a4b/attachment-0001.html From steweg at ynet.sk Fri Feb 26 04:20:29 2010 From: steweg at ynet.sk (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A9tefan_Gula?=) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:20:29 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] Help : Test setup for Pim4 and IGMP between sunets (for VLC source and Receiver ) multicast test. In-Reply-To: <000301cab6da$fd9fbb30$1c0ea8c0@elitecore.com> References: <000301cab6da$fd9fbb30$1c0ea8c0@elitecore.com> Message-ID: If you use VLC a source of multicast stream, please increate default value TTL of multicast packets, because VLC uses default value of TTL 1, which means that it cannot be forwarded by any multicast router to other segments. Also make sure that mrib table on both routers has all know networks including end users networks so RPF will not fail. For example I don't see any routing protocol to generate fib table a because of that also not populating also mrib table. Use at least static routing so end to end connectivity (unicast ICMP ping) between both end users networks is established. Hope this will help you 2010/2/26 saurabh : > > > Dear Xorp users, > > > > "I think many of other xorp users must passed this stage, at where I am > struggling right now" > > I am struggling to make the test setup of pim and igmp (after going thru > manuals and rfcs) > > > > Aim is to see multicast traffic in VLC player at PC1 which is coming from > PC2 (multicast source for 224.0.0.4) > > ,Off course through PIM and IGMP. (I should see proper join & prune at both > routers) > > > > I have two pc(win-xp), ?(At diff subnets) > > two routers (both run Xorp live cd). > > > > With 2nd XP pc2, I am multicasting stream at 224.0.0.4 group..udp(port > 1234).. > > And @ 1st xp pc1, I am trying to view the video stream. > > > > Both Pcs are behind different xorp (live cd) router as shown in figure > below.. > > > > PC1 ?xp ???????????????????? ??????????? ????PC2 -xp > > 193.193.193.111???????????????????? ? 194.194.194.111 > > ???? eth(0)??????????????????????????????????? ??????(eth0) > > ???? ?????? |???????????????????????????????????????????? | > > ??????????? |?????????? ????????????????????????????????? | > > ??? le1 193.193.193.1??? ??? le1 194.194.194.1??? (pim-RP) (DR) > > ??? le0 195.195.195.20? ???le0 195.195.195.10 > > ? XORP-CD-Router1 ----? XORP-CD-Router2 > > > > > > (bsd naming are le0..1 ..instead of eth0.1..) > > > > IGMP activity is happening: (J) > > What I observed is that PC1's vlc client is joining 224.0.0.4 group, when I > start to > > Play button of vlc,? I can see it by "show igmp group" command at router1's > cli, > > > > No PIM activity is happening: (L) > > I noted that router1 is not sending pim join (*,G) to router2 for group > 224.0.0.4 > > (Which should be as I have defined router1's le0 as RP for group > 224.0.0.4/8) > > > > Only I can see pim neighbors while trying command ("show pim neighbors"), in > both > > routers , in that case router1 is being shown as NOT DR, and router2 as DR > > > > And I have also noted that multicast traffic that is coming at le1 in > router2, > > (from PC2-which is multicast source)? that is not forwarded to le0. > > (I think which should be, as it must go to RP interface which is le0 of > router2) ! > > > > Plese help me, what I missing something? > > > > I have configured fib2mrib.. And not configured any other unicast > protocols.? (Is this correct) > > I have also not set default gateway (default routes in any routers) > > > > > > I think "Mohd" and other users have done this setup that I saw from > sep-oct-2009 mailing list? > > > > Plese share your exp. for pim igmp setup.. > > > > > > config are below,,,, > > > > > > Thanks, > > Saurabh > > > > config file for router2 i given here in last, in router1 config only change > > in interface address, remaining all are same > > > > **************************************************** > > > > root at xorpcd.local# show > > > > ??? protocols { > > ??????? fib2mrib { > > ??????? } > > ??????? igmp { > > ??????????? interface le0 { > > ??????????????? vif le0 { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? interface le1 { > > ??????????????? vif le1 { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????? } > > ??????? pimsm4 { > > ??????????? interface le0 { > > ??????????????? vif le0 { > > ??????????????????? dr-priority: 250 > > ????????????? ??} > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? interface le1 { > > ??????????????? vif le1 { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? interface "register_vif" { > > ??????????????? vif "register_vif" { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? static-rps { > > ??????????????? rp 195.195.195.10 { > > ??????????????????? group-prefix 224.0.0.0/8 { > > ??????????????????????? rp-priority: 250 > > ??????????????????? } > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? switch-to-spt-threshold { > > ??????????????? interval: 10 > > ??????????????? bytes: 1000000 > > ??????????? } > > ??????? } > > ??? } > > ??? fea { > > ??????? unicast-forwarding4 { > > ??????? } > > ??? } > > ??? interfaces { > > ??????? interface le0 { > > ??????????? description: "Ethernet" > > ??????????? vif le0 { > > ??????????????? address 195.195.195.10 { > > ??????????????????? prefix-length: 24 > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????? } > > ??????? interface le1 { > > ??????????? description: "Ethernet" > > ??????????? vif le1 { > > ??????????????? address 194.194.194.1 { > > ??????????????????? prefix-length: 24 > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????? } > > ?? ?????interface lo0 { > > ??????????? description: "Loopback interface" > > ??????????? vif lo0 { > > ??????????? } > > ??????? } > > ??? } > > ??? plumbing { > > ??????? mfea4 { > > ??????????? interface le0 { > > ??????????????? vif le0 { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? interface le1 { > > ??????????????? vif le1 { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????????? interface "register_vif" { > > ??????????????? vif "register_vif" { > > ??????????????? } > > ??????????? } > > ??????? } > > ??? } > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xorp-users mailing list > Xorp-users at xorp.org > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users > > -- Stefan Gula CCNP, CCIP From jose.spam at netvisao.pt Sun Feb 28 17:48:37 2010 From: jose.spam at netvisao.pt (Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 01:48:37 +0000 Subject: [Xorp-users] Is xorp in SVN 1.7-WIP more stable than xorp 1.6? Message-ID: <20100301014837.GA6196@calhariz.com> Is xorp in SVN 1.7-WIP more stable than xorp 1.6? I have problems in packaging xorp 1.6 for Debian when some of the problems are all ready solved in svn repository. My biggest problem is compiling xorp 1.6 with g++ 4.4 in architectures like alpha, sparc, hppa, etc. Everything than is not a x86, x86-64 or PPC. Jose calhariz -- -- O Dom desse bispo ? que ele n?o tem papas na ?ngua! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100301/b1c3a056/attachment.bin