From eaversa at gmail.com  Mon Jan  4 20:35:01 2010
From: eaversa at gmail.com (Eric Aversa)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:35:01 -0500
Subject: [Xorp-users] Problem with bgp and policy
Message-ID: <a1f1c5c61001042035o6a140d16m954b740d4116850c@mail.gmail.com>

I encounter the following error when trying to restrict locally
connected subnets exported via bgp. I am trying release 1.6 of xorp.

Command failed Export of bgp failed: sem_error from line 106 of
visitor_semantic.cc: No protocol specified in source match of export
policy

I am trying to use the config below. Am I doing something wrong with
my network4 policy?

>   protocols {
>       bgp {
>           bgp-id: 192.168.3.1
>           local-as: "64512"
>           enable-4byte-as-numbers: false
>           import: "bgp-in"
>           export: "REDIST_STATIC"
>       }
>   }
    policy {
        policy-statement "REDIST_STATIC" {
            term 1 {
                from {
                    network4: 192.168.3.0/24
                }
            }
        }
>       policy-statement "bgp-in" {
>           term 0 {
>               from {
>                   neighbor: 192.168.1.28
>               }
>           }
>       }
    }
    fea {
        unicast-forwarding4 {
            disable: false
        }
    }
    interfaces {
        restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
        interface eth0 {
            description: ""
            disable: false
            discard: false
            unreachable: false
            management: false
            vif eth0 {
                disable: false
                address 192.168.1.40 {
                    prefix-length: 24
                    disable: false
                }
            }
        }
        interface eth1 {
            description: ""
            disable: false
            discard: false
            unreachable: false
            management: false
            vif eth1 {
                disable: false
                address 192.168.3.1 {
                    prefix-length: 24
                    disable: false
                }
            }
        }
    }


From eaversa at gmail.com  Mon Jan  4 20:44:42 2010
From: eaversa at gmail.com (Eric Aversa)
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 23:44:42 -0500
Subject: [Xorp-users] Problem with bgp and policy
In-Reply-To: <a1f1c5c61001042035o6a140d16m954b740d4116850c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a1f1c5c61001042035o6a140d16m954b740d4116850c@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a1f1c5c61001042044n7cd83a18u36a51830fefd4b16@mail.gmail.com>

It seems that my problem is resolved if state my policy accordingly:

>    policy {
>        policy-statement "REDIST_STATIC" {
>            term 1 {
>                from {
                      protocol: "connected"
>                    network4: 192.168.3.0/24
>                }
>            }
>        }


On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Eric Aversa <eaversa at gmail.com> wrote:
> I encounter the following error when trying to restrict locally
> connected subnets exported via bgp. I am trying release 1.6 of xorp.
>
> Command failed Export of bgp failed: sem_error from line 106 of
> visitor_semantic.cc: No protocol specified in source match of export
> policy
>
> I am trying to use the config below. Am I doing something wrong with
> my network4 policy?
>
>> ? protocols {
>> ? ? ? bgp {
>> ? ? ? ? ? bgp-id: 192.168.3.1
>> ? ? ? ? ? local-as: "64512"
>> ? ? ? ? ? enable-4byte-as-numbers: false
>> ? ? ? ? ? import: "bgp-in"
>> ? ? ? ? ? export: "REDIST_STATIC"
>> ? ? ? }
>> ? }
> ? ?policy {
> ? ? ? ?policy-statement "REDIST_STATIC" {
> ? ? ? ? ? ?term 1 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?from {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network4: 192.168.3.0/24
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ?}
>> ? ? ? policy-statement "bgp-in" {
>> ? ? ? ? ? term 0 {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? from {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? neighbor: 192.168.1.28
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? }
>> ? ? ? ? ? }
>> ? ? ? }
> ? ?}
> ? ?fea {
> ? ? ? ?unicast-forwarding4 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ?}
> ? ?}
> ? ?interfaces {
> ? ? ? ?restore-original-config-on-shutdown: false
> ? ? ? ?interface eth0 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ?description: ""
> ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?discard: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?unreachable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?management: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?vif eth0 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?address 192.168.1.40 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?prefix-length: 24
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ?interface eth1 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ?description: ""
> ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?discard: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?unreachable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?management: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ?vif eth1 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?address 192.168.3.1 {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?prefix-length: 24
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?disable: false
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> ? ? ? ?}
> ? ?}
>


From mohd.arif at nechclst.in  Sun Jan 10 23:41:40 2010
From: mohd.arif at nechclst.in (Mohd Arif)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:11:40 +0530
Subject: [Xorp-users] [PIM-SM] Urgent Query Regarding C-RP-Adv messages
Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303BA1489@mailserver.nechclst.in>

Dear All,
            Can somebody suggest that how the transmission interval
between C-RP-Adv messages can be changed.
            As per my observation, the current time difference between
two C-RP-Adv is 60 seconds.
            I want to make this interval as a configurable parameter.
 
            I tried it by changing values of rp_holdtime, but I think it
is not related to the transmission interval between two C-RP-Adv
messages.
            
            Thanks for the support.
            
Best Regards,
Mohd. Arif



DISCLAIMER: 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.  
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its 
affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in  
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates.  
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of  
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. If you have  
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. . 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100111/56977e76/attachment.html 

From gs050486d at student.etf.rs  Mon Jan 25 06:53:41 2010
From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:53:41 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] Xorp (&networking) rookie
Message-ID: <eeb684a708342beb1f2d68fb4b854c0b@student.etf.rs>

Hi to all,
I'm beginner in this area. I'm curious what will I need (of equipment) to
configure and check basic xorp functions, to test how it functioning? (I
have laptop&desktop PCs with XinXP and ADSL huawei router)?!

Thanks a lot! "_"


From mohd.arif at nechclst.in  Wed Jan 27 21:17:48 2010
From: mohd.arif at nechclst.in (Mohd Arif)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:47:48 +0530
Subject: [Xorp-users] [URGENT] PIM-SM Operation on PowerPC Architecture
Message-ID: <0A8CFEC45B7F4C419F7543867C47442303C93225@mailserver.nechclst.in>

Dear All,
            I've compiled XORP for PowerPC architecture.
            Router Manager and PIM-SM are successfully running on the
PowerPC based board.
            The issue is that the Candidate RP is always sending
C-RP-Adv with ZERO hold time and ZERO priority.
            I changed the values of both configuration parameters using
CLI. But even then, hold time and priority is ZERO.
 
            In addition, whatever be the priority of static RP, the XORP
is always taking it as ZERO. (Information checked using "show pim rps"
command)
 
Can somebody suggest that what's going wrong?
            I'm sure that the configuration file is absolutely correct.
            Is there any kernel parameter which needs to be changed for
it?
            
            Kindly suggest. I've tried every approach that I had in my
mind but didn't get any positive result.
 
 
Best Regards,
Mohd. Arif
            



DISCLAIMER: 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.  
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or NECHCL or its 
affiliates. Any views or opinions presented in  
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of NECHCL or its affiliates.  
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of  
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. If you have  
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. . 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20100128/f84c1a88/attachment.html 

From gs050486d at student.etf.rs  Sun Jan 31 08:02:13 2010
From: gs050486d at student.etf.rs (=?UTF-8?Q?Stevan_Grbi=C4=87_05/0486?=)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:02:13 +0100
Subject: [Xorp-users] Very basic questions
Message-ID: <f8d78ee9495ab384b6c8fff611466b5d@student.etf.rs>

Hi everyone,
I'm pretty new at Linux and XORP. I have downloaded XORP 1.6, unziped it
and followed instructions for compiling, but I get stuck at gmake..
Here's what I get typing into terminal:

grbic at ubuntu:~$ cd Downloads
grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads$ cd xorp-1.6
grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads/xorp-1.6$ ./configure
checking build system type... gmai686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... keyes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
checking for gpp... no
checking for aCC... no
checking for CC... no
checking for cxx... no
checking for cc++... no
checking for cl.exe... no
checking for FCC... no
checking for KCC... no
checking for RCC... no
checking for xlC_r... no
checking for xlC... no
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
See `config.log' for more details.
grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads/xorp-1.6$ gmake
No command 'gmake' found, did you mean:
 Command 'imake' from package 'xutils-dev' (main)
 Command 'mmake' from package 'mmake' (universe)
 Command 'tmake' from package 'tmake' (universe)
 Command 'hmake' from package 'hmake' (universe)
 Command 'omake' from package 'omake' (universe)
 Command 'qmake' from package 'qt4-qmake' (main)
 Command 'qmake' from package 'qt3-dev-tools' (main)
 Command 'guake' from package 'guake' (universe)
 Command 'jmake' from package 'dist' (universe)
 Command 'make' from package 'make' (main)
 Command 'dmake' from package 'dmake' (main)
 Command 'vmake' from package 'hdf4-tools' (universe)
 Command 'cmake' from package 'cmake' (main)
 Command 'pmake' from package 'pmake' (main)
gmake: command not found
grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads/xorp-1.6$ make
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads/xorp-1.6$ 


what should I do? (as I saw in getting starting,I should have gmake by
default..)

I'm running Ubuntu 9.10(karmic) with 2.6.31-17 linux kernel and 2.28.1
gnome..

Also, I'm planing to run, XORP in Sun's Virtualbox to examine XORP
(&network) basics, what should you recommend me?

Thank you in advance!


From moto at kawasaki3.org  Sun Jan 31 23:02:22 2010
From: moto at kawasaki3.org (moto kawasaki)
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:02:22 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [Xorp-users] Very basic questions
In-Reply-To: <f8d78ee9495ab384b6c8fff611466b5d@student.etf.rs>
References: <f8d78ee9495ab384b6c8fff611466b5d@student.etf.rs>
Message-ID: <20100201.160222.247041332.moto@kawasaki3.org>


Hi,

> gmake: command not found
> grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads/xorp-1.6$ make
> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
> grbic at ubuntu:~/Downloads/xorp-1.6$ 
> 
> 
> what should I do? (as I saw in getting starting,I should have gmake by
> default..)

You can check if gmake exists in your system by "which gmake."

If you surely have gmake but which command won't agree, then you need
to check your path by "echo $PATH" (comannd differs depending on your
shell).

Sorry in advance, I am not Ubuntsu user so that the above may be
wrong.

Enjoy!

-- 
moto kawasaki <moto at kawasaki3.org>