[Xorp-users] I: RE: ospfv3 interfaces on the same link with different network prefixes

[maxd at inwind.it]

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: maxd at inwind.it
>Data: 29/06/2011 9.14
>A: <p_latini at hotmail.com>
>Ogg: R: RE: [Xorp-users] ospfv3 interfaces on the same link with different	
network prefixes
>
>Hi Patricio,
>thanks for your answer. I want to be sure that I was clear enough about the 
>issue I have.
>In a scenario like yours, I see that you have three network segments:
>-Internet---Xorp
>-Xorp---Router
>-Router-host
>Let's consider the Xorp---Router segment. I understand that you have more 
than 
>one address on each interface. Let's consider the site local addresses on 
this 
>segment. The Xorp node will have a site local address, say it SL_ADDR_XORP, 
and 
>the same will be for the router, say it SL_ADDR_ROUTER. In your network 
>scenario, SL_ADDR_XORP and SL_ADDR_ROUTER, do they share the same network 
>prefix? By network prefix I mean the network part of the address (e.g., the 
>first 64 bit of the address if you have a /64 mask). In my configuration, 
they 
>do not share the same network prefix (I need to have this configuration), 
and 
>what I get is that, projecting the behaviour I am experiencing on your 
network 
>topology, the Xorp node will not have an entry in the routing table for 
>SL_ADDR_ROUTE, and the same will be for the router. 
>Do you experience a different behaviour?
>
>Thanks again,
>Massimiliano
>
>
>>----Messaggio originale----
>>Da: p_latini at hotmail.com
>>Data: 28/06/2011 19.49
>>A: <maxd at inwind.it>, <xorp-users at xorp.org>
>>Ogg: RE: [Xorp-users] ospfv3 interfaces on the same link with different	
>network prefixes
>>
>>Massimiliano:
>>
>>Yes, I have a Internet---Xorp---Router---host configuration with three
>>addresses between xorp box and the router (Link Local, site local and
>>global). Xorp is generating the default route and propagating it to the
>>router, also it is learning the site local and global networks configured on
>>the hosts side of the router.
>>
>>So far, no problem.
>>
>>Patricio
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org [mailto:xorp-users-bounces at xorp.org] On
>>Behalf Of maxd at inwind.it
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 2:18 PM
>>To: xorp-users at xorp.org
>>Subject: [Xorp-users] ospfv3 interfaces on the same link with different
>>network prefixes
>>
>>Hi,
>>I have a network in which each network interface has two addresses: a link-
>>local one (assigned by the IP Stateless ZeroConf mechanism) and a site-local
>>one. The site-local address has a different network prefix for each network
>>interface, i.e., network interfaces attached on the same link do not share
>>the same network prefix. Has anyone tried this configuration? I cannot get
>>it to work with XORP: each node is missing the route entries towards the
>>nodes attached on the same network segment. Notice that the same network
>>scenario is managed  fine by QUAGGA. 
>>
>>Thanks for your help!
>>Massimiliano
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Xorp-users mailing list
>>Xorp-users at xorp.org
>>http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-users
>>
>>
>
>