From phil.wiggins at gmail.com Thu Dec 6 07:04:32 2012 From: phil.wiggins at gmail.com (Phil Wiggins) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP testing on PPC400 processor family Message-ID: Ben and Igor, We appreciate all the great work that you're doing in this community. At the xorp test environment [1], I see that the test environment scales across a number of O/S (linux, freebsd, etc), but only x86 and arm for processors. I just want to confirm that this is the case. We have been doing some building on an embedded PPC400 family [2] architecture and starting to notice issues as we apply various loading conditions (e.g. timer issues under CPU load). What would it take to add PPC440 family variant to the xorp test environment? Can that be done with a PPC emulator (e.g. QEMU running linux [3])? To better understand your test environment more generally, do you apply constraints for memory (e.g. 128/256M) and processor speeds (e.g. 200/400 MHz using cpulimit [4]) within the software environments under test? [1] http://dmz2.candelatech.com:8010/waterfall [2] https://www-01.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/techdocs/F72367F770327F8A87256E63006CB7EC/$file/PowerPC440_Nov2006.pdf [3] http://www.makestuff.eu/wordpress/running-debian-for-arm-powerpc-on-qemu/ [4] http://cpulimit.sourceforge.net/ Cheers, Phil From igorm at etf.rs Thu Dec 6 23:15:39 2012 From: igorm at etf.rs (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Igor_Maravi=E6?=) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 08:15:39 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] XORP testing on PPC400 processor family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Phil, I didn't perform any performance tests, but this is something that I plan to do. Could you send me your testing scenario, and any scripts that you use, so I could see what's happening inside Xorp. BR Igor On 6 Dec 2012 16:05, "Phil Wiggins" wrote: > Ben and Igor, > > We appreciate all the great work that you're doing in this community. > At the xorp test environment [1], I see that the test environment > scales across a number of O/S (linux, freebsd, etc), but only x86 and > arm for processors. I just want to confirm that this is the case. > > We have been doing some building on an embedded PPC400 family [2] > architecture and starting to notice issues as we apply various loading > conditions (e.g. timer issues under CPU load). What would it take to > add PPC440 family variant to the xorp test environment? Can that be > done with a PPC emulator (e.g. QEMU running linux [3])? > > To better understand your test environment more generally, do you > apply constraints for memory (e.g. 128/256M) and processor speeds > (e.g. 200/400 MHz using cpulimit [4]) within the software environments > under test? > > [1] http://dmz2.candelatech.com:8010/waterfall > [2] > https://www-01.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/techdocs/F72367F770327F8A87256E63006CB7EC/$file/PowerPC440_Nov2006.pdf > [3] > http://www.makestuff.eu/wordpress/running-debian-for-arm-powerpc-on-qemu/ > [4] http://cpulimit.sourceforge.net/ > > Cheers, > > Phil > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20121207/e8ec215c/attachment.html From priyankaboyapati02 at gmail.com Mon Dec 10 02:14:53 2012 From: priyankaboyapati02 at gmail.com (priyanka boyapati) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:44:53 +0530 Subject: [Xorp-users] How to enable syslog in rtrmgr Message-ID: Hi All, Can anyone let me know how to enable syslog in RTRMGR with -L option. I am using xorp-1.6 Thanks in Advance... Regards, Priyanka. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20121210/995dce7b/attachment.html From aborrero at cica.es Wed Dec 12 01:41:57 2012 From: aborrero at cica.es (Arturo Borrero) Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:41:57 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] About the allmulti flag Message-ID: <50C85165.4040709@cica.es> Hi there! I'm wondering how the ALLMULTI flag is related to xorp. Does xorp activate it automatically in my interfaces? Have I to set it up manually? An example: I have some interfaces on my box: some have the ALLMULTI flag 18: bond1.27 at bond1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT link/ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff And some not: 20: bond1.31 at bond1: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT link/ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff In this case (bond1.31) I don't get multicast running, despite the exact same configuration than in bond1.27. The only different I can see is the ALLMULTI flag. Multicast transmissions are running fine in bond1.27. I really want to avoid doing something like "ifconfig bond1.31 ALLMULTI" manually. Best regards. -- Arturo Borrero Gonz?lez Departamento de Seguridad Inform?tica, @NIS_CICA (twitter) Centro Inform?tico Cient?fico de Andaluc?a (CICA) Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n - 41012 - Sevilla (Spain) Tfno.: +34 955 056 600 / FAX: +34 955 056 650 Consejer?a de Econom?a, Innovaci?n, Ciencia y Empleo Junta de Andaluc?a -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3072 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20121212/d8c28158/attachment.bin From milutin.aksic at hotmail.com Sun Dec 30 02:05:28 2012 From: milutin.aksic at hotmail.com (Milutin Aksic) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:05:28 +0100 Subject: [Xorp-users] question Message-ID: Hello everybody, I have a goal to implement isis protocol in xorp from quagga isis implementation. So I need instructions how to use isis code in quagga (isisd directory) and adopt it to xorp platform. I've seen that I could use ospf xorp imple- mentation and suit it to isis but I need more instructions. It is possible because ospf and isis are similar in many ways. Thank you in advance, Milutin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/xorp-users/attachments/20121230/0e0e33b3/attachment.html