[Bro-Dev] Proposing a new type: opaque
vallentin at icir.org
Mon Nov 19 08:57:51 PST 2012
> > opaque of T
> Not sure I like this. It seems too similar to the current syntax of
> tables and vectors (I do want to see the vector syntax eventually
> though). It looks like T would be a yield value.
I see the similarity to other language elements rather as a consistent
form of integration. Why would the "T of Y" syntax only pertain to
container types? Admittedly, we have currently no other uses, but looks
like a reasonable one to me.
While this looks good to folks familiar with C++ and templates, it looks
like an exceptional one-off to the Bro language. As you said, it would
involve tweaking both lexer and parser, and when is a about to happen,
we should rethink the added value.
More information about the bro-dev