[Bro-Dev] [JIRA] (BIT-1119) topic/jsiwek/tcp-improvements

Robin Sommer (JIRA) jira at bro-tracker.atlassian.net
Tue Jan 28 15:34:58 PST 2014

    [ https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15303#comment-15303 ] 

Robin Sommer commented on BIT-1119:

I'm going ahead merging this but I'm wondering about the new {{detect_filtered_trace}} flag. It's pretty common (in the research world, anyways :) to run Bro on a SYN/FIN/RST trace and I imagine having this by default off can add a lot for warnings in that case. Can we add some other heuristic to detect such a trace (i.e., guess whether  {{detect_filtered_trace}} should be on) ? A (very) coarse approach would simply be a global variable recording if we've ever seen anything else than a TCP control packet.  Thoughts?

> topic/jsiwek/tcp-improvements
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: BIT-1119
>                 URL: https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1119
>             Project: Bro Issue Tracker
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Bro
>    Affects Versions: git/master
>            Reporter: Jon Siwek
>             Fix For: 2.3
> This branch is in the bro, bro-testing, and bro-testing-private repos and has a few changes to improve reporting of TCP connection sizes and gaps (commit messages explain in more detail).
> The baseline changes in the external repos all seemed reasonable/explainable (or actually fix a problem).  There's too much changed to go through case-by-case and actually check things, but I did do closer examinations of unique differences as I came across them (e.g. try to corroborate Bro results via wireshark).  Then for those that seem to follow the same trend as something I already inspected, I wouldn't manually check.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

More information about the bro-dev mailing list