[Bro-Dev] Looking on feedback on PACF/reaction framework

Scott Campbell scampbell at lbl.gov
Fri Jun 20 17:08:59 PDT 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 6/19/14 2:41 PM, Robin Sommer wrote:
> 
> I have revised the proposed API a bit, see
> 
> http://www.bro.org/development/projects/pacf.html
> 
> I would be interested in feedback regarding if (1) the User API is 
> generally expressed at a good level, and (2) if this covers the 
> functionality that people have implemented, or plan to, for 
> interfacing with their network gear.
> 
> Any other thoughts are welcome too, of course.
> 
> (The details for individual operations aren't cast in stone yet
> and could certainly be adjusted/extended).
> 
> Robin
> 
> 
Besides all of Vlad's excellent points, I might add that OpenFlow
related activity should be pointed at a controller rather than an
individual switch.  This might be one way to address the load
balancing issues as well.

The other question that I have is how you would identify the flow
direction in the conn_id object in the instance where I want to shunt
out one side of a connection?

Might be nice to have a count() as well since many hardware devices
have hard limits on what they can deal with.  This also might make a
nice example for an extension of the RuleType.

Looks like you might have answered the flow question already via
ORIG/RESP?

thanks!
scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlOkzRsACgkQK2Plq8B7ZBy7SgCfUP8O4IprafnjoA0k5L9Z1WcK
Pe8AoIzL57yQJFYAsGV7b3rr0t2DwiBb
=xMhK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the bro-dev mailing list