[Bro-Dev] libbroker status/plans
robin at icir.org
Mon Nov 3 15:02:17 PST 2014
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 22:58 +0000, you wrote:
> wouldn’t be stuck with SQLite if that’s chosen as a default. And we
> could provide more than one option at a time. Maybe we could have the
> default be SQLite (for convenience), but optionally support RocksDB
> (for those in need of better performance).
That would sound good to me. SQlite is somethign we can ship (just as
with Bro), whereas RocksDB seems complex enough that leaving it
external may be better.
> We need to be using Broker’s data store abstraction when making
> changes for those updates to be correctly propagated to clones. But
> should be easy to write such tools using libbroker.
Ah, good point. And yeah, working without Broker wouldn't work anyways.
Robin Sommer * ICSI/LBNL * robin at icir.org * www.icir.org/robin
More information about the bro-dev