[Bro-Dev] [JIRA] (BIT-1240) TCP gaps inserted in wrong place

[Jon Siwek (JIRA)]

    [ https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18008#comment-18008 ] 

Jon Siwek commented on BIT-1240:
--------------------------------

You're right, http_entity_data was still raised in an odd order.  There's a new commit on the same branch, topic/jsiwek/bit-1240.  If you're able, please pull that in and let me know if it helps.

> TCP gaps inserted in wrong place
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BIT-1240
>                 URL: https://bro-tracker.atlassian.net/browse/BIT-1240
>             Project: Bro Issue Tracker
>          Issue Type: Problem
>          Components: Bro
>    Affects Versions: git/master, 2.3
>         Environment: CentOS 6
>            Reporter: Jimmy Jones
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: get-hole1.trace
>
>
> Using attached test file, I tried using the file analysis framework to extract out the payload, which is a copy of one of the bro testcases but with a packet removed.
> However the extracted file has nulls padded at the beginning, but they should be at offset 1448. Looking at what happens, the gap is signalled to File::Gap before the data is received in File::DataIn, which calculates the offset to write the payload by adding the seen bytes to the missing byte count. Should gaps always be signalled in order with the data - this also affects users of content_gap, who would receive the data and hole "out of order"?
> Used the following bro script:
> event file_new(f: fa_file)
> {
>   Files::add_analyzer(f, Files::ANALYZER_EXTRACT, [$extract_filename=f$id]);
> }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4-OD-04-006#64001)