[Bro-Dev] Trouble with getting Bro 2.2 private analyzer to write logs on current master
James Swaro
james.swaro at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 20:26:09 PDT 2015
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:30 AM, James Swaro <james.swaro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If I understand the patch correctly, it would only cause problems for
>> connections with over 2GB of data payload, but I think it should work fine
>> for a small trace of say 200KB. I'm not seeing any events at all, nor am I
>> seeing the log files that should be created when using the analyzer.
>>
>
> That was the point of that change, yes, but the breaking modification was
> that the function signatures are now different. Specifically, those are
> virtual functions that you're inheriting. If your parameters don't match
> exactly, you're just defining a new virtual function as opposed to
> redefining the existing function.
>
Good point.
>
>
>> I'll correct the functions and test it out though.
>>
>
> When you said that you're not seeing DeliverPacket be entered, was that
> after making the uint64 change?
>
I thought I had corrected it, but seems like the definition was still
slightly off. I'm getting all of my logs now as expected. Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Vlad Grigorescu <vlad at grigorescu.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:30 AM, James Swaro <james.swaro at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If I understand the patch correctly, it would only cause problems for
>> connections with over 2GB of data payload, but I think it should work fine
>> for a small trace of say 200KB. I'm not seeing any events at all, nor am I
>> seeing the log files that should be created when using the analyzer.
>>
>
> That was the point of that change, yes, but the breaking modification was
> that the function signatures are now different. Specifically, those are
> virtual functions that you're inheriting. If your parameters don't match
> exactly, you're just defining a new virtual function as opposed to
> redefining the existing function.
>
>
>> I'll correct the functions and test it out though.
>>
>
> When you said that you're not seeing DeliverPacket be entered, was that
> after making the uint64 change?
>
> --Vlad
>
>
--
James Swaro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/pipermail/bro-dev/attachments/20150617/418ed0ee/attachment-0001.html
More information about the bro-dev
mailing list