[Bro-Dev] package manager progress
johanna at icir.org
Wed Jul 27 09:15:27 PDT 2016
And to add a me three to this - I am also with him on this one. On top
of things - I might misremember this, but didn't we plan package names
to include the github user name at one point of time? So a package name
would be user/redis, for example, and there also could be user2/redis?
On 27 Jul 2016, at 9:05, Matthias Vallentin wrote:
>> I actually don't like this that much because some of these can cross
>> boundaries and do all sorts of different things in a single plugin.
>> It makes more sense to me to leave the naming open.
> I'm with Seth on this one. The reason why I think we should keep the
> naming open is that it's the job of the meta data tags to take care of
> the grouping. If someone writes a redis package, then they should
> the redis package. Encoding this meta data into the package name is
> quite limited, however.
> bro-dev mailing list
> bro-dev at bro.org
More information about the bro-dev