[Bro-Dev] [Proposal] Language extensions for better Broker support
robin at icir.org
Tue Jan 3 08:47:46 PST 2017
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 11:46 -0800, you wrote:
> That would mean we'd have new keywords: is, to, as. I find that's too
> confusing and think we should go with either "to" or "as" but not both.
Yeah, I agree, don't like that version anymore either. I have just
committed a first implementation of the type-based switch that uses
this syntax instead:
case type string:
case type count as c:
What do you think of that? The additional "type" makes it visually
clear what's it's about, and also helps the parser figure it out.
Robin Sommer * ICSI/LBNL * robin at icir.org * www.icir.org/robin
More information about the bro-dev