[Bro] TCP Sack processing
adayadil.thomas at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 13:53:23 PDT 2005
Thanks for the reply.
>>SACKs are advisory, not guarantees
Could you be a little more elaborate on that. or point me to some rfc
or other doc ?
Thanks a lot
On 8/9/05, Vern Paxson <vern at icir.org> wrote:
> > Does TCP stream reassembly algorithm need TCP SACK processing for completeness ?
> No. SACKs are advisory, not guarantees, and can be ignored for purposes
> of stream reassembly.
More information about the Bro