[Bro] Brocontrol revisited

James Lay jlay at slave-tothe-box.net
Sun Aug 3 04:44:14 PDT 2014


Morning all (least where I'm at),

So...when I very first started with bro, I noticed that running
brocontrol vs. just bro I noticed a large difference in cpu usage.  This
morning I decided to revisit brocontrol.  When running bro commandline I
see:

top - 05:31:35 up 5 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.30, 0.70, 0.38
Tasks:  95 total,   2 running,  93 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 11.3 us, 23.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 64.5 id,  0.0 wa,  0.4 hi,  0.0 si,
0.0 st
KiB Mem:   3082108 total,  2562596 used,   519512 free,    29828 buffers
KiB Swap:  3002364 total,        0 used,  3002364 free.  2212828 cached
Mem

  PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S %CPU %MEM     TIME+
COMMAND 
1735 root      20   0  761264  62972   8696 R 27.5  2.0   0:16.45 bro 

However when running broctrl running standalone on the same machine I
see:

top - 05:34:44 up 8 min,  2 users,  load average: 0.68, 0.60, 0.40
Tasks: 100 total,   3 running,  97 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 10.3 us, 33.7 sy,  3.2 ni, 52.1 id,  0.7 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,
0.0 st
KiB Mem:   3082108 total,  2578976 used,   503132 free,    30604 buffers
KiB Swap:  3002364 total,        0 used,  3002364 free.  2216848 cached
Mem

  PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S %CPU %MEM     TIME+
COMMAND 
 2356 root      20   0  529220  56588   8624 R 24.8  1.8   0:04.44 bro 
 2358 root      25   5  168756  50788   2896 R 15.6  1.6   0:02.24 bro 

I like brocontrol's ease of use and auto-reports, but not at the cost of
an additional bro process that eats %15 CPU usage.  Any explanation for
this?  Thank you.

James
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/pipermail/bro/attachments/20140803/557f177f/attachment.html 


More information about the Bro mailing list