[Zeek] Request for Feedback - Zeek Process Supervision Model
Seth Hall
seth at corelight.com
Fri Mar 22 14:09:48 PDT 2019
On 22 Mar 2019, at 11:11, Mike Dopheide wrote:
> One thing I haven't seen specifically called out yet (perhaps I missed
> it)
> was making sure we keep the functionality for broctl commands that
> aren't
> really about managing processes. Like 'check', 'print', 'diag', etc.
> I
> could be them being part of a separate tool still, but I find them
> extremely valuable for debugging.
We haven't specified or deeply discussed what some of the extra tooling
will look like yet, but one goal we have is to simplify everything and
cut out features that aren't utterly critical or can't be done better by
other system tools (and obviously watching for community feedback and
discussion on what stays and goes as we keep moving forward!)
.Seth
--
Seth Hall * Corelight, Inc * www.corelight.com
More information about the Zeek
mailing list