[Xorp-hackers] Some thoughts

[Hasso Tepper]

Kristian Larsson wrote:
> Oh, I wasn't away of the limit to one secondary. Seems like a strange
> limit ;) 

It's not a limit, it's a bug.

> It won't be default but from someone who's using xorp I think you can
> expect them to turn on a few kernel options or do propose that xorp
> should handle the problem?

And you would mandate using not even yet released kernel? Anyway, it's
irrelevant to the current discussion. It was mentioned only as side
effect of addresses add/remove handling scheme.


-- 
Hasso Tepper