[Xorp-hackers] ospf4 and ospf6 can not apply export policy at the same time
Li Zhao
lizhaous2000 at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 11 11:49:20 PST 2009
The problem with redistributing static to both ospf4 and ospf6 is like this:
The two policies will ask RIB to add <ospfv2, tags="7"> and <ospfv3, tags="8">
into _policy_redist_map. But when static_routes pushed the route to RIB,
in route (both ipv4 and ipv6) _policytags there is only 8 there. So RIB did not redistribute
this static route into ospfv4.
Li
--- On Fri, 12/11/09, Li Zhao <lizhaous2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Li Zhao <lizhaous2000 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] ospf4 and ospf6 can not apply export policy at the same time
> To: "Bruce Simpson" <bms at incunabulum.net>
> Cc: xorp-hackers at xorp.org
> Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 1:32 PM
> Bruce, what does a PolicyTag mean?
> e.g. RIB was asked to add <ospfv2, tag=7> and
> <ospfv3, tag=8> into _policy_redist_map. How the
> source protocol
> (e.g. static_routes)
> uses that tag to mark routes I do not quite understand.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Li
>
> --- On Mon, 11/30/09, Bruce Simpson <bms at incunabulum.net>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Bruce Simpson <bms at incunabulum.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Xorp-hackers] ospf4 and ospf6 can not
> apply export policy at the same time
> > To: "Li Zhao" <lizhaous2000 at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: xorp-hackers at xorp.org
> > Date: Monday, November 30, 2009, 6:05 PM
> > Li Zhao wrote:
> > > I noticed that if both ospf4 and ospf6
> redistribute
> > static routes, ospf4 will fail to redistribute static
> > routes. This is a bug.
> > >
> >
> > Can you please raise this on XORP's Trac on
> SourceForge,
> > preferably with an appropriate test case, so someone
> can get
> > around to looking at it when there's free time to do
> so?
> >
> > thanks,
> > BMS
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xorp-hackers mailing list
> Xorp-hackers at icir.org
> http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/xorp-hackers
>
More information about the Xorp-hackers
mailing list